American Bar Association Sues to Halt Trump’s ‘Intimidation’ of Law Firms
“What is happening today is not normal,” the legal group said.
Nathan Howard/REUTERS
The American Bar Association is suing the Trump administration over what it calls its “Law Firm Intimidation Policy.”
The suit, filed in Washington, D.C., claims that the Trump administration’s executive orders restricting the capacity of firms he has a grudge against to conduct business has caused a “pervasive fear” within the legal community.
“[M]any attorneys are no longer willing to take on representations that would require suing the federal government,” it states, because “certain kinds of expressions and representations pose a serious risk of making a firm the next target of the President’s unconstitutional Law Firm Orders.”
The suit cites one organization that “had to forgo litigation against the Administration” because lawyers removed themselves from the case amid the president’s executive orders.
“The President’s attacks on law firms through the Law Firm Orders are thus not isolated events, but one component of a broader, deliberate policy designed to intimidate and coerce law firms and lawyers to refrain from challenging the President or his Administration in court,” the suit states.
The ABA's suit claims that Trump's executive orders have created a "pervasive fear" of being his next target.
Carlos Barria/REUTERS
In response to executive orders revoking security clearances and preventing attorneys from entering federal buildings, some firms have opted to make agreements to do work for the administration, usually to the tune of tens of millions of dollars.
Sign Up for The Swamp Newsletter
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Others have decided to fight the orders in court.
Maryland congresswoman and ABA member April Delaney commended the organization for “standing up to the Trump administration’s unlawful attempts to intimidate attorneys and their clients.”
“The Constitution is unequivocal: every individual has the right to legal representation,” she said in a statement. “The President’s executive orders and backroom agreements with law firms directly threaten that fundamental right.”
The White House claims the ABA’s suit is “clearly frivolous.”
“The President has always had discretion over which contracts the government enters into and who receives security clearances,” spokesperson Harrison Fields told the Daily Beast in a statement. “His exercise of these core executive functions cannot be dictated by the ABA, a private organization, or the courts. The Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on this issue.”
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison agreed to do $40 million in pro bono work for the administration, which then rescinded its executive order against it.
ANDREW KELLY/REUTERS
The ABA and the Trump administration previously butted heads last month when the Justice Department said it would restrict the legal organization’s access to its judicial nominees, citing alleged bias in the review process.
The ABA denied that claim.
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.