Are Holbrooke's Hands Tied?
Delicate Middle East situation restricts moves.
Richard Holbrooke doesn't have an easy job, and despite his best efforts, it may be inevitable that America loses the battle in Afghanistan. If anything, George Packer's New Yorker profile of the State Department's special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan shows the circumstances conspiring to tie Holbrooke's hands. Holbrooke's counterterrorist strategy in Afghanistan is to funnel American aid money through the Afghan government in order to encourage citizens to trust and rely on their government. However, his efforts have been hampered by the tension between the desires of America, locals, and the Afghan and Pakistani governments, which have created a situation so delicate that he dare not address the problems head-on. In April Holbrooke alluded to the ties between Pakistani intelligence and the Afghan Taliban, which alienated Pakistani generals. Meanwhile, Indian officials have made it clear that discussion of terrorism in Kashmir, key to stability in the region, is verboten, and Afghan President Hamid Karzai doesn't want to talk about the corruption in his government. There's no good solution, and because the lack of the stability in the region poses a direct threat to the U.S., Holbrooke says that withdrawal is "just not an acceptable course of action."
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.