Artificial Sweeteners Aren't Bad for You?
Myths about cancer, deformities persist anyway.
Forty years ago, the Food and Drug Administration put out its first smackdown on artificial sweetener. At that time it was an ingredient known as cyclamate, the precursor to aspartame. First appearing on the market in 1951, cyclamate was enthusiastically embraced by food and beverage companies as a more palatable, less metallic alternative to saccharine. Americans, amid their love affair with junk food, ate up the guilt- and calorie-free option. Studies since have linked artificial sweeteners to a variety of malignancies, from deformities to cancer. But are they getting a bad rap? "The fear-mongering and misinformation plaguing the faux-sweetener market seems to be rooted in a common misconception," writes Claire Suddath of Time magazine. "The general consensus in the scientific community is that saccharin, aspartame, and sucralose are harmless when consumed in moderation." Maybe that message will make it to the public in the next 40 years.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.