Claim: Organic Food Isn't Healthier
U.K. report finds that food grown without pesticides or hormones isn't more nutritious
The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine has published a report in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition claiming that organic foods are neither healthier nor more nutritional than conventionally produced food. The report contradicts previous scientific reporting and explodes the cultural myth that food grown without the use of pesticides and hormones is nutritionally superior. Dr. Alan Dangour, who led the review, said, "Most studies were based on the hypothesis that eating organic food is beneficial to health. Looking at all of the studies published in the last 50 years, we have concluded that there's no good evidence that consumption of organic food is beneficial to health based on the nutrient content." But so what if organic isn't more nutritious, asks Marion Nestle, professor of nutrition, food studies, and public health at New York University, in The Atlantic. "This is an example of nutritionism in action: looking at foods as if their nutrient content is all that matters—not production methods, not effects on the environment, and not even taste."
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.