Death-Row Inmate Can’t Give New Evidence
OK court rejects hearing with proof of innocence.

Nick Oxford/Reuters
An Oklahoma appellate court on Monday ruled against death-row inmate Richard E. Glossip in his request for a new hearing to present evidence that his lawyers say proves his innocence. Judge David B. Lewis wrote the three-judge majority of the Court of Criminal Appeals that the new evidence “merely builds upon evidence previously presented to the court.” Two judges dissented, citing the evidence against Glossip as weak. A father of seven was beaten to death with a baseball bat inside a motel he owned in 1997. A 19-year-old confessed to the killing, but said Glossip, who was the motel manager, convinced him to do it. Glossip was convicted based largely on Sneed’s testimony and Sneed was sentenced to life in prison as part of a plea deal. One of Glossip’s lawyers, Mark Henricksen, said he anticipates taking the request to the U.S. Supreme Court in a last ditch effort before Wednesday’s scheduled execution.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.