Jane Austen's Work Heavily Edited
According to new Oxford research.
It is a sad day for English majors. Jane Austen’s delicately crafted style of prose may not have actually been her own. Like so many other great writers, Austen had the silent work of an editor to thank. The claim that Austen had help was made by Kathryn Sutherland, a professor at Oxford, who has spent the last three years studying 1,100 original handwritten pages of the novelist’s unpublished work. "The polished punctuation and epigrammatic style we see in Emma and Persuasion is simply not there," Sutherland said. She added that the manuscripts are messy, feature plenty of crossing out, and demonstrate "a powerful counter-grammatical way of writing.” Sutherland believes that the editor who may have helped her achieve her refined style was William Gifford, who worked for Austen's publisher John Murray II. Still, it isn’t all bad news for Austen fans. Sutherland added that the manuscripts showed "to be even better at writing dialogue and conversation than the edited style of her published novels suggest."
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.