Judge Rejects BofA Settlement
Wonders why SEC accepted small penalty.
A judge wouldn't approve a $33 million settlement between Bank of America and the Securities & Exchange Commission Monday, and demanded to know why the regulatory agency would ask for such a meager fee. The judge also wanted to know the names of executives who are allegedly involved in keeping secret from investors their plan to pay out billions of dollars in bonuses during the financial crisis."[If Bank of America] misled the shareholders, as you assert about a multibillion dollar matter, isn't there something strangely askew in a fine of $33 million?" asked Judge Jed S. Rakoff. The U.S. District Court judge's decision is a setback for the SEC, as it suggests the watchdog federal agency is on the same side as one of the banks it is supposed to be monitoring. "It is very difficult for me to see how the proposed settlement…is remotely reasonable," Rakoff wrote, giving the SEC and the bank until August 24 to provide more details about the settlement.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.