Mike Johnson Suggests ‘Eliminating’ Entire District Courts to Help Trump
The House Speaker argued that “desperate times call for desperate measures.”
House Speaker Mike Johnson said Congress has the power to eliminate entire district courts on Tuesday, joining a chorus of Republicans growing increasingly frustrated with federal courts blocking the Trump administration’s sweeping efforts to overhaul the government.
Johnson, a former constitutional attorney, said there was “a dangerous trend” of federal judges issuing nationwide injunctions that prevent the implementation of President Donald Trump’s policies.
“We do have authority over the federal courts, as you know,” he said in a press conference. “We can eliminate an entire district court. We have power of funding over the courts and all these other things, but desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act. So stay tuned for that.”
In the latest episode of courts going against the Trump administration, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order on Tuesday that blocked the detention of Columbia student Yunseo Chung, who was targeted for her participation in pro-Palestinian protests.
The most high-profile legal showdown has been playing out in Washington, where Judge James Boasberg ordered the Trump administration to turn around planes carrying deported Venezuelan immigrants accused by the government of having links to the gang Tren de Aragua.
Sign Up for The Swamp Newsletter
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Lawyers for those immigrants said their clients were denied due process. In one instance, a man was accused of gang affiliation because he had a tattoo that his loved ones insist was inspired by Real Madrid, a soccer team with a huge fanbase in Latin America, and because he posed with a rock-and-roll hand sign in an old photo.
Judge James E. Boasberg, chief judge of the Federal District Court in Washington, D.C.
Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images
Boasberg has, in particular, become the subject of Trump’s ire, with the president calling for the judge’s impeachment.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts later issued a rare statement reminding Trump that impeaching judges was “not an appropriate response” to disagreements over judicial decisions.
Johnson, however, insisted that “it violates the separation of powers when a judge thinks that they can enjoin something that a president is doing that the American people voted for.”
“That is not what the founders intended,” he said. “So there’s a natural tension between the branches of the government, and we’re working through that.”
The speaker said the House Judiciary Committee was exploring options to fight back against the courts, including a bill seeking to limit the scope of federal injunctions.
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
- Account (completed)
- Payment (completed)
- Confirmation (completed)
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
- 1Account
- 2Payment
- 3Confirmation