‘Outrageous Incompetence’: Army General Rips Trump Team for Signal War Chat
Retired general Barry McCaffrey stated that foreign intelligence agencies had likely penetrated the group chat.
A retired general tore into Trump Cabinet members for endangering military personnel by using a messaging app to discuss military strikes.
“This was an egregious breach of security that put Navy combat fliers at risk,” Barry McCaffrey, a four star general, told MSNBC’s José Díaz-Balart on Wednesday.
“If this had been a Navy Lieutenant commander talking to an Air Force Major, they both would’ve been fired and probably court martialed.”
McCaffrey stated that Trump officials should have never planned the bombing of Houthi forces in Yemen on the Signal app, stating that it was “obviously” classified as it was a “pending military operation.”
ADVERTISEMENT
President Donald Trump and other members of the group chat, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard have all tried to shrug off The Atlantic's bombshell report, claiming that no classified information was exchanged in the group chat.
Sign Up for The Swamp Newsletter
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
“I’ll reiterate that there was no classified material that was shared,” Gabbard insisted under oath before a Senate panel Tuesday.
Hegseth has tried to play the report down, asserting to reporters Monday, “Nobody was texting war plans.”
Carlos Barria/REUTERS
But on Wednesday, Hegseth was revealed to have texted the exact timings of when U.S. military fighter pilots would launch their attacks, after previously redacted messages were released.
“TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch,” Hegseth wrote, continuing, “1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package).”
McCaffrey said the use of the Signal app was a “major breach in protocol” and showed “outrageous incompetence on the part of the most senior officers in government.”
The general, who retired in 1996 after serving in the Vietnam War and the Gulf War, stressed that officials should have used the “multi-million dollar” systems specifically designed for discussing sensitive military operations, such as a sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF).
He argued that it was now crucial to investigate what else might have been leaked to adversaries from the group chat.
“We should also assume that, if you’re not in government systems, you’re on commercial encryption, many foreign intelligence agencies have probably penetrated it,” he said.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
- Account (completed)
- Payment (completed)
- Confirmation (completed)
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
- 1Account
- 2Payment
- 3Confirmation


