WORK DISPUTE

Supreme Court Justice Tears Into Colleagues in Blistering Takedown

The justice believes the nation’s highest court has “blinded itself” to the harm its rulings have caused.

Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan has launched a scathing attack on some of the conservative-majority court’s decisions, calling them detrimental to the country’s democracy just weeks before the crucial midterm elections.

Speaking at an event at Catholic University’s law school in Washington, D.C., the liberal justice singled out rulings that weakened a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.

She said those relating to racial discrimination during redistricting, the loosening of campaign finance restrictions, and the barring of courts from intervening in partisan gerrymandering were particularly damaging.

Kagan, nominated to the bench by then-President Barack Obama, dissented from the court’s rulings in each case.

“In all these areas, the court has kind of blinded itself to the very deleterious effects of their rulings on how the political system works,” Kagan said on Tuesday, The New York Times reported. She added that this had resulted in “a democracy that does not work as well as it should.”

Kagan said a 2019 decision removing federal courts from oversight of partisan gerrymandering had led both parties into a “race to the bottom” as they redrew maps to benefit Democrats or Republicans in ways that “is very destructive of our democracy.”

OUT OF HIS MIND

Trumpy Justice Jabs at President After SCOTUS Freakout

Will Neal

When SCOTUS gutted a major section of the Voting Rights Act to prevent racial discrimination in voting in April, Kagan said she felt her colleagues had failed to grasp how damaging the decision would be, as Black lawmakers could be forced out through redrawn maps. “The court kind of said, ‘Oh well,’” Kagan said, according to The Washington Post.

Kagan also blasted a June SCOTUS decision on campaign finance which sided with congressional Republicans to abolish limits on how political parties can coordinate directly with candidates.

“The people of America look around this political system and think that all this money chasing all these political candidates is a nightmare,” she said. “And they’re right.”

Kagan also spoke out against her conservative colleagues’ defense of originalism, the theory that the Constitution should be interpreted based on the original public meaning of its text at the time of adoption.

“They were writing the Constitution for the ages. They were writing the Constitution, knowing that there would be change in the world,” she said, adding that support for originalism “is kind of misconceived, and it’s not a very good match with the Constitution we have.”

Despite her takedown of the nation’s highest court, Kagan said SCOTUS has been getting a “bum rap” for its numerous rulings that have greatly benefited Donald Trump.

JUSTICE DENIED

SCOTUS Justice Attacks Court for Destroying Its Reputation

Ewan Palmer

Kagan cited high-profile decisions that have gone against the president, including the conservative majority’s ruling that his global tariffs were illegal and its decision blocking his bid to end birthright citizenship.

Play Video

“It’s why the president sometimes really has not very nice things to say about the court’s decisions and some of my colleagues,” Kagan said.

Kagan spoke with Prof. J. Joel Alicea at Catholic University. Alicea previously served as a law clerk to conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito.

See more of our coverage in your search results.

ADD THE DAILY BEAST ON GOOGLE

Ewan PalmerReporter

Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.