Trump Judge Busted Using ChatGPT in Court Ruling
A federal judge pointed to the AI chatbot in a Thursday opinion.

CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Imag
A Trump-appointed judge needed help with a court ruling, so he turned to ChatGPT.
Judge Chad Readler from the Court of Appeals’ Sixth Circuit consulted an artificial intelligence chatbot and Urban Dictionary to decipher whether the phrase “monkey a--” was racially hostile.
The move stemmed from a case where plaintiffs Thomas Michael Smith and Monaleto Sneed alleged that their former supervisors at PAM Transport Inc. discriminated against them for being Black by referring to them by using terms like “monkey” and “monkey a--.”
District Judge Eli Richardson in Tennessee, also a Trump appointee, ruled in favor of the trucking company last year. But the three-panel Sixth Circuit reversed the ruling in a Thursday decision.
In his separate concurring opinion, Readler wrote that the Tennessee court “admittedly had difficult issues to address in the delicate setting of race discrimination.”
ADVERTISEMENT
“Among them, how do we assess intent, context, and other relevant considerations in a setting where the individual who purportedly engaged in race discrimination is a member of the plaintiff’s race?” he wrote.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
“Does the term ‘monkey a--,’ a phrase understandably not included in traditional dictionaries, have the same racial connotation as the term ‘monkey,’” Readler went on, citing definitions from Urban Dictionary and ChatGPT.
The chatbot’s lengthy response to the question, “What does monkey a-- mean?” concludes, “Racial? Not inherently - but can be, depending on how and to whom it’s said.”
The Daily Beast has contacted Readler for comment. Trump announced his intent to nominate Readler to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2018 to a seat vacated by Deborah L. Cook. He was confirmed in 2019.

Judge Chad Readler asked ChatGPT to define the phrase "monkey a--"
Judge Chad Readler asked ChatGPT to define the phrase "monkey a--"
In the opinion penned by Obama appointee Jane Stranch, the Sixth Circuit said, “there is no meaningful difference between the terms ‘monkey’ and ‘monkey a--’ when used by a supervisor against an African American employee, as alleged here.”
Stranch acknowledges in a footnote that Readler cites ChatGPT in his concurrence.
“ChatGPT functions as a consolidator of information, synthesizing patterns from a vast body of text,” she said. “But it does not independently verify the accuracy of any material or its unknown sources.”
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.


ADVERTISEMENT
Sign in or create an account
Login dialog
Loading comments…
ADVERTISEMENT