WSJ Turns on Trump Over Yanked Security for Aides
The newspaper criticized the president’s decision to remove security protection for his three former advisers.

JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images
While The Wall Street Journal’s editorial division has famously leaned right for years, the outlet seems to be growing critical of President Donald Trump, with a new opinion piece condemning his decision to remove security protection for John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, and Brian Hook. Published Thursday, the piece spotlights the slippery slope of Trump’s decision to leave his three former advisers unprotected when they have all been threatened by Iran. In 2022, a member of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) was charged by the Justice Department for scheming to kill Bolton, Trump’s former national security adviser. Meanwhile, Pompeo and Hook, Trump’s former secretary of state and Iran envoy respectively, reportedly learned of their security protection loss on Wednesday, according to the Associated Press, and have both received “credible” threats against them, WSJ adds. “When you have protection, you can’t have it for the rest of your life,” Trump told reporters on Thursday. “I mean, there’s risks to everything,” he added, explaining his decision.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.