Blogs and Stories
The Fire-Bombed Book
Read an excerpt.
In the eyes of Ms Jones, Aisha is a legendary woman from Islamic tradition, whom Muslim women can relate to because she led a life beset with challenges similar to their own, albeit in the even harsher reality of seventh century Islam. Aisha, a bright and defiant woman, endured the experience of being a child bride in a forced marriage to a polygamous husband in a household with little space for any form of individual self-expression. None of this story is new to anyone who grew up with Islamic teachings; nor is it contradictory to the most common Sunni sources of the faith.
Ms Jones does not question the morality of the prophet. She does not judge him in a negative way. There is no hidden meaning between-the-lines that will inspire young Muslim female readers to question their faith or the inconveniences of marrying against one's will, nor of sharing your husband with a dozen other women, nor even why it is wrong to be married off as a child to a man four times your age. In fact, Ms Jones makes the same lame excuses that Muslims make to condone the prophet's behavior.
From a moral perspective, I can find nothing in this poorly written book that deviates from the standard Islamic teachings. The only character in Ms Jones book that is close to an antagonist is Umar ibn Khattab, a warrior Khalif and a hero in the Sunni version of Islam, mainly because of his dramatic conversion to Islam and his conquests for the Khalifate. However, beyond his hot temper and his determination to put women in their place — in the Arab-Islamic mind both traits are admirable — the author does not succeed in making him into a bad character.
Ms Jones does not condemn Mohammed for having sex with Aisha at the age of nine. The sex scene is not described graphically and its conclusion for Aisha is described by Ms Jones as something Aisha always wanted. All the behavior considered immoral and misogynistic in the modern day Western attitudes that offends Muslims are repeated in the novel and affirmed. Rather than being a challenge to Islam, The Jewel of Medina is a pro-Islamic, Pro-Mohammed novel and could easily serve as propaganda material for any Muslim organization promoting the idea that Muslim women must not only accept the position that Islam ascribes to them but should also view that inferior position as a gift from God.
From my perspective, Ms Jones's novel does not come close toward helping Muslim women imagine that there is a reality beyond subjugation. The main lesson for a Muslim woman to take from the Aisha the heroine of The Jewel is that it is best to aspire to becoming the head of the concubines, or the hatun, and in that dubious position to remind herself that her job is to support Muhammad's decisions, not to doubt them. Obedience as a lesson is not something Muslim girls need to read about in novels; it is a concept they have to live with every day.
Where Ms. Jones succeeds, however — and, it seems, unwittingly — is to show the problem Islam perpetually has with fiction. It is not enough to be positive about the prophet Muhammad, (peace be upon him), i.e. to stick to the Islamic account of events surrounding the prophet's life. It is not enough to express oneself in the same tone of deference that Muslims do when talking or writing about their religion.
What it confirms is that Muslims believe that Muslims and infidels both must place Islam's main characters out of bounds for fiction, for literature in general, and for cinema, except as a means of dawa or to spread the faith. Even in existing propaganda films financed with Saudi money and the official blessing of the Wahabi clerics, no image of the prophet is presented.
The leaders of Islam thus freeze the Muslim imagination and deprive the Muslim mind from evolving through story-telling in novels, movies and any other art form. There is a great deal of fiction and poetry in the Arab-Islamic past as well as attempts at fiction today, but Mohammed figures in very few stories as a character, say, in the way Jesus or Moses figure in Judeo-Christian literature and cinema.
The fuss over The Jewel of Medina is merely the latest episode that draws attention to the clash between Islam and freedom of expression in the West, the same issues raised by The Satanic Verses and my and Theo van Gogh's film Submission. It again raises profound questions about how Western story-telling institutions can best take on fiction inspired by Mohammed, his household and the Koran, the book he said was revealed to him — a book that has a tight hold on the imagination of over a billion people in the world today, some of whom use it to justify the most atrocious activities since the Middle Ages.
With the presence of over 20 million Muslims in the West and with Islam now the fastest growing religion in the world, there is an even greater responsibility for all press, publishing houses and film-makers to encourage both non-fiction and fiction works about Mohammed and his colorful life. So to the British publisher of The Jewel of Medina, Bravo!













The fire-bombing will ensure that this mediocre and, to many Muslims, blasphemous book will get tons of publicity. Surely it would have been better to ignore it.
The book looks like a provocation. Also, it brings out a genuine clash of values. People in the West are used to seeing holy figures mocked and reviled in print or on TV, filmsd, and the like. I don't like it at all, but it is a fact. Hence Westerners put up with it. Muslims do not have such a tradition. That is why the problem arises.
Which of us is better?
Discuss.
Prince Eugen
"Prince Eugen": Do you know what freedom of speech is?
If this book draws Muslim ire, then the story on the news tonight about some guy in Germany claiming that Mohammed never actually existed should liven things up considerably.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.