Blogs and Stories
The Heat Quotient
How Obama and Palin redefined political sex appeal.
There was a photograph in The Times Sunday that showed a rumpled David Axelrod slouched wearily in a chair wearing an old green sweater—with Barack Obama perched in the background, checking the display of his PDA. The room reeked of the pizza box weariness of a campaign in its last days—except for the candidate. For the millionth time the picture served to show how mesmerizingly crisp Obama always looks.
I can’t say if those hand-pressed looking shirts are made of the finest Egyptian cotton or not—maybe they're from Costco—but the point is they suggest it. The simplicity of Obama’s lean, monochrome suits and solid blue ties makes every other pol appear porky and plebeian, old school glad-handers in oversize watches. It’s not just the clothes, of course. It’s the wearer—his carriage, the loping grace of his walk to the stage.
Palin is more likely to trade in Todd than give up her new A-list look for long. She fought too hard for it.
It’s also that the way he’s put together works simultaneously south of the Mason-Dixon line and south of 14th Street. When Obama works a rope line to most people he just looks neatly dressed. But to others he looks as stylishly minimalist as one of those Meatpacking District boutiques where a few shirts are piled artfully on otherwise empty shelves. It’s a little like the Republicans’ dog-whistle rhetoric, in which routine-sounding words like “worldview” and “wonder-working” convey a special, coded meaning to Christian conservatives. Obama's look conveys the message of a new world order to the young.
It must be hell for John McCain and Bill Clinton, both alpha males who were always the sexiest guys in the room and have now been outpaced by this new kind of charisma. McCain was a heartthrob when he came back from Vietnam, with his hell-raiser smile and hair turned fetchingly white. One sentence of his backstory and the job was done: he had you at “my plane got shot down.” On the Straight Talk Express he was still an irresistible charmer. And Bill? Well, I’ve been in rooms when every woman he passed in the line was left with a deep burning blush of surprised conquest.
Hence the rage on both Clinton and McCain’s parts. McCain hates being deprived of his flyboy glamour as much as he hates being bested by a cool political novice who hasn’t paid his dues. He wasn’t looking old until Obama came on the scene. He was craggy, he was devil-may-care. He could still get the girls. As for Bill Clinton, Joe Klein’s biography was rightly titled The Natural. Bill always knew there was one phrase set aside for him in political retrospectives. The words “preternaturally gifted” belonged only to him. Until now. And that doesn't even take in the galling fact that the younger man stole his wife's exceptionalism. Obama's glamour didn't just eclipse Bill it made the first serious woman running for president look passé too.
What's interesting is the androgynous quality of the Obama appeal. He’s almost like an avatar sent out dressed as himself to turn red states into blue. There are no “jumpers” at his rallies like the girls who jumped up and down at Kennedy rallies in the sixties. It’s significant that the Obama girl who lipsynched about "having a crush on Obama" in the YouTube clip during the primaries was immediately assumed to be a viral Internet plant. Obama is too contained to have the kind of sex appeal we are used to in public men whose drive to seduce sometimes becomes literal when it comes to the opposite sex.
Sarah Palin is now almost as large a celebrity as Obama but her appeal is as tactile as Obama’s is abstract, as Dionysian as his is Apollonian. She is genuinely gorgeous, with that thick, cascading soap opera hair, generous mouth, and beauty pageant legs. (If the Republicans really wanted Joe the Plumber’s vote, they should have blown some of that 150 grand at Victoria’s Secret.) The notion that after the campaign they’ll make her give the new wardrobe back, by the way, is palpably ridiculous. Don’t we want Sarah Palin to look hot?
Besides, no woman who has worn a $2,500 dollar silk Valentino jacket is ever going to return to wearing bargains from Out of the Closet, or desert the glossy standards of the new hairdresser who travels on the campaign plane for the Beehive in Wasilla. Palin may fish out a few old outfits for spin control to show she’s still real on the trail but she is more likely to trade in Todd than give up her new A-list look for long. She fought too hard for it. Her raw, striving quality is one of the qualities that makes her so compelling to watch. Are we now surprised that she's campaigning for her future rather than the ticket?
She’s tasted the big time now. Go, Sarah! Obama versus Palin in 2012 sounds like a pretty incendiary reality show. The two stars from the same generation have redefined charisma and sex appeal for the multimedia age. Meanwhile, when the governor of Alaska returns to Anchorage after the election she is going to be about as content with her old life as Madame Bovary in Yonville. That’s the movie I really want to see.










Bravo, Tina!
Obama's allure comes from within, radiating outwards. Palin is still just lipstick on a pitbull.
Dead on! Obama's attractiveness is based on style that is the natural expression of quality. Palin's is based on playing up her advantages to cover up her shortcomings. Both Obama and Palin prove the resolution: When you've got it, you don't have to flaunt it.
Brilliant Tina!
i agree that Sarah will have a very hard time trading in her clothes...her re-entry to her family life may be more challenging.
Dear Tina,
As usual, you make so many statements that I smile and agree with, it is challenging to pick just one to "leave a comment" on.
I must re-sound most with the sharpness with which you comment on observations on how Obama seems to have the inate ability to consistently rise above comparisons to his other male counterparts on style, poise, responses, and "calm under fire" demeanor.
I wish more of our political leaders had somewhere near this amount of grace - regardless of political party affiliation.
I wish we could elect all 4. (Of course we can't, a girl can dream.) I think we need them all with the amount of challenge we are about to face in the coming years. I am glad that all 4 are in positions of leadership - as I believe they each represent an aspect of our American society that needs to be heard. Whoever wins, I hope they all work together well. We are (we Americans) all sure to need them as the coming years see the effects of both our economic woes and international conflicts play out on the world stage.
Back to your observations on Obama & Palin. You are right on - on Palin especially - but possibly her fight to attain respect (that I believe she has earned under fire) will humble her greatly and the "off the rack" specials won't be a that much of a problem. Heaven knows, she has more higher priorities to her day - with a special needs child and a new grandchild on the way.
We all may have to embrace a few left over threads if the economy goes the way most economists predict... bye bye Prada.
- - just some thoughts from an Old Skool Girl
Ole Todd looks like a worthy house-husband and Sarah is more Cabin John than Middleburg.
Is this the best you have? Is this your best shot at political substantive commentary? Give me a break!
While Ayers and Khalidi, both terrorists, (weather underground, and plo) TEACH OUR KIDS, and are tied to Obama, you are discussing his smooth couture? Give me a Break. I am really scared for our future country!
It is so tiring to hear people like Campbell Brown whinge about this focus on appearance. Unfortunately, it's part and parcel of the human psyche and we can't avoid it. We can't ignore it. If we could, thousands of glossies wouldn't exist.
A Daily News photograph of Obama at the roast the other week served to be one of the most poignant and provocative images of a presidential candidate ever. In a tuxedo with white bow tie, the man was utterly presidential. It was prescient.
When the clock strikes twelve, to whom does the RNC donate Ms. Palan's temporary wardrobe? Jossete The Plumber? The lady sleeping in the bus station or pushing a shopping cart filled with her current ensamble? Museum of Modern Art? Was this part of the plan before it was discovered?
If anyone thinks sexy sarah is is riding off into the sunset (or sunrise in Alaska, who knows) should think again. Think Fox and Murdach and ratings like O'Reily's at least until until people see through that brillant smile and lying eyes.
sandman
I'd love an Obama-Palin run-off in 2012 because it would be a massacre. Palin may spend the next four years improving as a "fast learner" but absorbing more RNC party lines will not give her a brain nor change her style of governance with its dubious ethics and cronyism. Hard to believe that pattern will change any more than Palin's love of the good life. She's a walking endorsement of the the refrain, "How will you keep them down on the farm after they've seen Paree?" So she can exploit her sexiness as much as she wants, but the public at large is looking for more than that in a leader. Ideas and intellect count. Palin can't deliver on those.
Yes, for those who are disposed to be stuck in "limbic-mode" I guess it's of anthropological interest as to who has the better looking feathers and mating dance.
But in the case of Palin we have a pretty presentation that hides a not so pretty psychology. Many women apparently are overlooking the fact that Palin thinks Roe v. Wade should be overturned and just recently she made a vague reply to the question of whether abortion clinic bombers are terrorists. You'll have to excuse me, Ms. Brown, if I don't find sexy a woman who would turn a blind eye to the carnage and tragedy caused by an abortion clinic bomber.
Then of course is her association to her church where a minister from Africa - with quite a reputation himself - prayed over her to protect her from "witchcraft". If anyone is still unconvinced then go to this link and find out about Palin and her sexy associations.
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2008/9/5/114652/6239
The gullibility is already outstanding from the millions who despite having been screwed by the Republicans and their corporate kin still believe in their hollow promises with Stockholm Syndrome largesse. I guess we can also add at this point many women to their ranks. It would seem that a particular number of female population's ability to multi-task better than the male is unfounded.
Yes, I guess in some people's perceptions it's just all too sexy. If that type of sexiness is what will rule then I guess for a heterosexual male like myself celibacy may be the way to go.
The point of this article seems to have been abandoned. Whatever the cosmetic and promotional make-over, our politicians, AND our political issues are camoflaging deeper dysfunctions. The "lipstickonapig" debacle provided the opportunity to explore the deeper issues of repeatedly focusing on presentation over substance, not only of people, but of issues. Our political and media culture has become more adept at 'spin' and beehives than they have at developing and articulating clear policy details, pouncing to superficial discredits rather than substantive discourse.
I do believe that Obama is the real deal, yet he fights not only the establishment, but also the human psyche. Like Snow White and Eve before her, we are easily seduced by the pretty shiny apple, believing that it's offered by a generous hand.
Tina, it's good (and ironic) to see this piece paying so much attention to Obama's wardrobe at a time when McCain supporters (see Ms. Button on this very website) are saying that all the attention to how much was spent on Palin's wardrobe is sexist.
Palin's appeal is the stuff of celebrity and gossip magazines. For conservative pundits to herald her as the face of the new Republican party, is their attempt to take the first power grab of a party in disary. Palin represents the narrow Republican base. That is why Obama appeals to the moderate Republican voter, not just his style.
Dear Tina,
Fun as politics must seem to you, for many of us a presidential campaign is not a "reality show" but reality itself. And, to make it clearer perhaps to someone who takes this all for just fun and games and movie-going, behind Door Number One is either the right to an abortion or no right to an abortion; Door Number Two conceals either the right of a president to lie to people to justify a war or a president who thinks that security in a global era is a complex and challenging process; Door Number Three contains a economy that takes into account the needs of all of the people in the country or an economy that is run for the winners and damn the losers. And there are scores of more doors.
So yeah, Sarah is hot and so is Barack. Now: do you have anything intereting to say about the state of the nation?
A devoted (though who knows how much longer) reader
Tina,
Congratulations on your new venture..... this piece is terrific..... the contrast in style (of all types) as between Obama and Palin is truly going to be something to watch. As sick as one might be of this campaign, 2012 may not get here soon enough to replace the entertainment value of what's happening in the last days of this campaign! Keep up the terrific work!
I adore this article. I think it is remarkable how the things that have drawn us to TV shows we might not otherwise watch - sexual charisma, good looks, intrigue - are the same things we're now looking for in a presidential candidate. I can't decide whether it's a step forward or not, but it is incredibly interesting.
I also love your analysis of McCain and Clinton's self-righteous ire at the young attractive kid in the room who doesn't even seem to be trying to get the girls. You pegged it. Maybe McCain wouldn't look at Obama in that first debate because he didn't want to be reminded of lost youth.
I just need to briefly call out RemoteOutpost on 2 points. First and most simplistic, is that this article refers to Palin's sexiness as far as her physical appearance goes. Thus, her opinions have no bearing on physical sexiness, the two are unrelated. Second, is that I am sick and tired of Obama supporter throwing around this African minister praying to protect Palin from witchcraft while crying foul whenever Rev. Wright comes up. It's just another example of hypocritical arguments against Palin.
Yes, the way Obama carries himself shows calm confidence, natural grace and eloquent presence: things presidential.
I think he looks presidential: the way he stands, holds his head high, responds to questions, and takes you into a post-racial America. What a relief from what we had for the 8-years.
Palin, on the other hand, is perhaps a true 'hockey Mom', loud and brawling, and an octave higher for my ears. She can only parrot, nothing worth listening to, even when she's trying to read off the page. Let Joe the Plumber 'pal' around with her !
Oh Tina,
You don't Really want to talk about 2012 yet; especially a scenario that includes Sarah Palin yikes! Can't we take a breath when this marathon ends (assuming it Is going to end on the 4th)
But you are right on about Barack slipping the mojo right out of Bill's manly grasp he is spitting mad- bet he didn't see That (One) coming! and McCain well he can work out his anger management issues at the craps tale in Vegas as usual though he may not have much company these days.
I am, like Obama and Palin, right at the forefront of Generation X. We are all grown up and after decades of standing in line behind Boomers who will not get out of the way -- we are ready to take over. It's going to be a lot of fun, we are an unpredictable lot. Get ready to throw the playbook out of the window.
Palin has made one profound contribution, and as much as I loathe her small town small mindedness, I will give her this -- she has vitality, energy, sexual power and potential. In Hollywood, women who are a decade younger are considered to be washed up. There are no parts for women over 40. Well, perhaps that is about to get a rethink.
Palin is clearly in her prime and is signalling to women everywhere that at 44 there is plenty of gas left in her tank. If some of it gets diverted to her cerebral cortex she might have a future in politics. I agree with Tina though, that Palin clearly has a future -- and putting that on the table for middle-aged women is a great achievement. So, you know what? Go Sarah!
Am I glad to find you again!! I subscribed to two magazines because you edited them and gave them up because they lost their savor without you. I have missed your wit and wisdom. I am delighted to find you again. What a joy to know I can read you every day!! Best of luck....
An intriguing picture of Obama, but you fell short on Palin.Palin may have become more proficient at memorizing her lines, but she still comes across as shrill and shallow - easier to watch with the volume muted. I have to agree with others that the RNC will be looking to Romney on November 5th.
smdunne wrote: "Palin has made one profound contribution, and as much as I loathe her small town small mindedness, I will give her this -- she has vitality, energy, sexual power and potential."
Ahhh, but what does she have the potential to do? Nuclear energy has the power to either light up or destroy a city; it's all in how it is used. My concern regarding Palin is that her "vitality, energy, [and] sexual power" would be used in the latter rather than in the former sense...
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.