Blogs and Stories
First Item of Business
Now here's your first challenge: take on the Democrats.
Congratulations to President-elect Obama.
What an impressive campaign. The book has been rewritten, and this will be discussed and analyzed for years.
One gets the sense that as good as Obama was when this all started about two years ago, the campaign made him better. Much better. As difficult and long as the process is, it forges presidents. It is a gauntlet that prepares leaders for the kind of physics they will face in the White House.
“No Drama Obama”—it’s a well deserved nickname. Obama’s equanimity throughout the course of this roller coaster campaign communicated a temperament well-suited to the Presidency. And boy will he need it. Because the hard part has just begun.
Obama needs to show he is not going to be rolled by the special interests of the Democratic Party. He needs to gore an ox.
Obama has proved he can be popular. Now he must prove he is unwilling to be unpopular. Because that’s what it takes to be a true leader. There is discussion that Obama will be the first “wired” president. Watch out for that one. Plugged in is good. Driven by and held hostage to mass opinion, not so good.
I admire and respect Obama enough that I chose not continue working for Sen. McCain after the primaries. But aside from my political differences there is one charge against Obama that continues to give me pause. There is scant evidence of him taking truly unpopular positions (being against the war in an Illinois State Senate district doesn’t qualify) or going against the interests of his party. John McCain has made a career of showing the courage to stand up powerful interests, including his own party (campaign finance reform, Gang of 14, earmark opposition, torture policy, the surge, opposition to the Medicare prescription drug bill).
President-elect Obama has so many challenges and so many opportunities. But he’d be wise early on in his administration to find at least one issue where he could provide some evidence that he is not simply going to be rolled by the special interests of the Democratic Party. He needs to gore an ox. A great place to start would be with Big Labor.
This election, Labor put its money where its special interests lie. They spent upwards of $400 million to support Democrat candidates. The cost of their financial largesse? Pledging support for the Orwellian-sounding Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), proposed legislation that would be the most radical change in labor law since the 1930s.
EFCA strips employees of the right to cast secret ballots in union elections and forces them to declare their intention publicly, which would subject them to coercion from union organizers. This is a solution in a search of a problem. Private ballots are a sacred Democratic tradition. So sacred that ten Democrats who are supporting EFCA today wrote a letter to the Mexican Congress in 2001 urging support for private ballots, which was just affirmed by the Mexican Supreme Court. The real but unstated “problem” is dramatically declining labor rates, from a third of the private work force in America in the 1950s to around just seven percent today.
This legislation is nothing but a Trojan horse full of goodies designed to make it easier for Big Labor to organize and impose hefty union dues on a workforce already stressed by the recent economic downturn. One of those presents calls for a federal bureaucrat to arbitrate terms of employment for an automatic two years if an agreement is not reached in 120 days. So, if you’re labor, why negotiate?
This legislation is so outrageous that the liberal icon George McGovern has come out of retirement to campaign against it, saying, “We cannot be a party that strips working Americans of the right to a secret-ballot election. We are the party that has always defended the rights of the working class. To fail to ensure the right to vote free of intimidation and coercion from all sides would be a betrayal of what we have always championed.”
Most employers in this country have no idea about EFCA. And when they discover it may be coming around the bend, they are going to revolt. This issue could turn into a firestorm and severely handicap Obama’s presidency before it gets out the crib, much like gays in the military hampered Clinton’s early days.
Obama should recognize that economic circumstances have dramatically changed and it would be wrong to impose this legislation on a workforce already in crisis. It’s not in the best interests of the country or his Presidency.
Gore this ugly ox and Obama will demonstrate he is truly his own man and capable of great things.









Mark,
If nothing else, you've certainly caught that audacious hope thing that seems to be going around.
Anyway, you certainly have my personal agreement that Big Labor needs to be reined in, but I don't think this is at the top of the list of our national priorities, nor would I wish that our President-elect think that he needs to prove his manhood to you by goring this particular ox first up.
Honestly, though, your whole formulation is wanting. Forgive me if I misunderstand, but you seem to be saying, "Mr. Obama, if you are bipartisan as you say you are, you will prove it to me by attacking a part of your base that I think is getting out of hand." And when your wishes aren't immediately granted, what? Do you say, "See? I knew he was a charlatan." Perhaps I'm being unair, and what you're really asking is that Obama lead in the style of McCain, since he is now filling the role that was destined for McCain.
Here is something I do know. Mr. Obama has asked us all to be ready to sacrifice as we meet the economic crisis. His challenge as a leader will be to cajole all stakeholders into each accepting some sacrifice. The political art here is to make each party walk away thinking they've gained more than they've given up or at least lost less than they could have.
The magnitude of the democrat landside at every level of government across the country has yet to be appreciated by even democrats because they're so used to not having a mandate. Even after the democrats won both houses of Congress in 2006, they still thought they were losers. At some point, even losers perceive a change in fortune when that change is large enough. Let the games begin.
Mark, if you weren't willing to fight against bad ideas in the campaign, you don't deserve to win after-the-fact. I guess you wanted it both ways and now you've lost twice. Good grief, a dead person could have countered the democrat's goofy ideas without even rising from the dead. People like you who sat it out--need to stay out. After all, you are the one you've been waiting for.
Mark,
Clearly, you have never worked for a company that harasses or fires employees who seek to form a union-but of course you have been working for those who try to bust union organizing so that is no surprise.
EFCA was sponsored by two Dems and one 'Pub, passed by the House and filibustered to death in the Senate by your fellow 'Pub union haters. The intent of EFCA is to allow employees to speak their preference for union representation outside the brow-beating view of the employer and to guarantee a contract if the employees-by majority-voice a desire to have a union. But I digress.
If you are looking for Barry to "gore an ugly ox", wouldn't it be better to select something of substance rather than something on your symbolic hit list? How about the $10 Trillion debt our nation owes? The last time I looked our bi-partisan congress has built a house of slavery for every citizen to the tune of $37K a piece. We are in an international credit crisis, the largest economy in the world is a slave to Trillions in debt and you are worried about whether Joe the Plumber works in a Union shop? Give me a break!
Perhaps you should have stuck with Walnuts and won the game for your home team. While I agree the new president's biggest battle may be with his own party, I am so sick of easy symbolism over responsible hard work I could puke.
Already, the voices of division have begun. MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!? Hey Mark, maybe now you could get a real job and find out what it's like.
Sincerely,
Still Pissed Off!
He has done well with regards to not caving in to special interests so far. Please maintain the same attitude!
Obama will take this issue head on- I assure you!
McCain made a career of going against his party until he decided to sell out and seek the support of the right wingers like Jerry Falwell. In the end, he voted against his own bill to end torture and gave up on immigration reform. So much for principle.
Obama should seek the best compromise solutions that will benefit the middle class.
Yeah, what a drag if workers could actually organize outside of the controlled company environment! Why they might even be able to negoiate decent living wages, working conditions, healthcare and who knows what all. Talk about redistribution of wealth - could cut profit margins, cause yacht sales to tank and just generally mess up the new gilded age that is such a great benefit to all working americans - you know, those folks who actually create the wealth,
DO ANY OF YOU INSIGHTFUL "COMMENTERS" HAVE THE SLIGHTEST IDEA WHO MARK MCKINNON IS??
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.