Blogs and Stories
Why Rich People Are So Miserable
Ron Galella/WireImage
Battles over great fortunes usually reveal controlling, narcissistic parents and lonely children.
There she is again, Brooke Astor on the front page of the New York Post. A current juicy scandal served up with your morning coffee. Friends and associates are cluck-clucking about how the people involved, all such private people, would have hated the new revelations about the alleged mistreatment, neglect, manipulation and fraud perpetrated on Mrs. Astor by her son Anthony Marshall as revealed in Meryl Gordon’s excellent new book Mrs. Astor Regrets. Oh, how terrible. Oh, how fascinating! Admit it, it wouldn’t be tabloid fodder unless there were a complicitous audience waiting to read all about it.
The Brooke Astor I knew was a warm and wise friend full of verve with an unexpected point of view that, although not always easy to accept, was usually on target—not cynical but unflinchingly realistic. It wasn’t the public occasions that I remember so vividly but the quiet nights with only a few people, say Christmas where Oscar de la Renta in perfect pitch sang carols acapella and Brooke’s face, as she held Annette’s hand, reflected complete repose and joy. We shall not see her like again.
There are two kinds of rich men’s sons, the overcompensators who have some chance of becoming men, and those who don’t enter the competition and remain forever boys.
But what this case provides is not found in personal recollections such as my own, but in the rare window it provides for the public to view inherited wealth: Not just substantial unearned money but vast riches, seemingly enough to fulfill one’s wildest fantasies. Only, as in a Grimm’s fairy tale, there’s a comeuppance. In a recession or depression, such as we are now experiencing, public exposure of this kind of tragic situation has deep resonances. The psychological reaction is this: I may not have a fortune or social cache, but I have all the things these people lack—emotional support, a work ethic, a functional family and most importantly, love. When I wrote Little Gloria . . . Happy At Last about the 1934 trial between Gertrude Vanderbilt Whitney and Gloria Vanderbilt for the custody of ten-year old Little Gloria, these feelings were part and parcel of the child’s “poor little rich girl” image, one that might also be applied to Doris Duke or the isolated Vincent Astor himself.
Over the years, I’ve become somewhat of an expert on the meretricious aspects of inherited wealth. (Ms. Gordon said my writing both inspired and provided a road map for her.)Over thirty years ago, I tackled the subject in The Straw Man. On page one the ne’er do well passive protagonist Bertie Royceman observes, “It’s not easy to be the son of a very rich man. It abstracts you from life. It is my observation that as a group the [children] of the extremely wealthy suffer damage. A few escape [but most] trapped beneath the shadow of power never see their own sun . . . Others overcompensate . . . These are the two kinds of rich men’s sons, the overcompensators who have some chance of becoming men, and those who don’t enter the competition and remain forever boys.”
In Johnson v. Johnson the six children of Seward Johnson, each of whom were worth over one hundred million dollars sued Barbara “Basia” Piasecka Johnson, constantly and wrongly referred to in the tabloids as “the Polish maid,” for a portion of his fortune. In my opinion, this was a matter that could have been settled over a cup of tea had not childhood damage and dysfunction played so great a role.
In these public cases all sorts of dirty linen is exposed. Battles over such great fortunes usually reveal (take your pick) controlling, narcissistic, uncommunicative, neglectful parents and isolated lonely children exposed to enormous luxury, who are given little chance to develop a sense of self worth. I was struck by the fact that little Gloria Vanderbilt and Anthony Marshall both had Trust funds invaded by their parents and both had nannies who gave them love and stability, but were summarily fired. These unhappy dramas usually play out against a background of boredom, profligacy, infidelities, divorces, drinking and so forth.







deborama
Inherited wealth is completely contrary to our notion of working to get ahead. It is highly detrimental to society and obviously detrimental to individuals as well. As long as there are people walking around rich as hell who never had to work a day in their lives, it is a massive affront to those of us working two or more jobs just to keep the banks and insurance companies at bay. There is NO REASON to allow people to pass along hundreds of millions of dollars to their spawn. No individual needs this much money. Hey! I've got an idea for America! Tax the rich! Really!
cctlund
Barbara Goldsmith is right about the rich and miserable. It takes great discipline and intelligence to keep wealth from ruining lives.
Ms. Goldsmith wrote one of my favorite books: Little Gloria, Happy at Last. It's a fascinating social history of another era -- a story of great wealth and the damage it can do. The book centers on a dramatic custody battle between equally unappealing women, neither especially interested in Gloria's lonely life.The book illustrates the lack of psychological insight into the emotions of children that was typical of the time.
If you want a great read, almost impossible to believe details about the lives of the rich, read this book!
cajola
I don't envy anyone with money, but I do dislike those who flaunt it about and feel the need to show off.....that really makes me sick.
If you have money whether you came by it working hard or inheritence...it's nice to remember where you came from and to help those less fortunate than you.
I definately don't think money buys you happiness....how can it,you buy eveything you want and what do you have after that to look forward to, nothing!!!!
It's better to be comfortable and happy than rich and sad....we see over and over how miserable some of these folks are with money, who needs that?
Money is the root of all evil, not a perfect cure for happiness.
tressiemc
Poor little rich people, indeed! I would much rather spend my compassion on actual poor people who go through the same trials of self-actualization only under the far more smothering shadow of POVERTY and who have no access to the resources that could best help them.
And, really, how pretentious is someone who quotes her own book as evidence of her claim? Pretentious and disingenious. You can't really use your own opinion as support for your own opinion.
Jeez.
flyoverland
As someone who grew up poor and made a lot of money, I worried about how it would affect the ambition of my daughter. She attends a snooty private school and came back the other day and said, "I just hate rich people". I was proud of her. While she knows we are not poor, she still has no idea. I only wish I could be there to watch when they read my will.
pixelcutter2003
I'm happy I have money, that's what makes me comfortable. Knowing I'm able to buy food and clothing for my family with out having to worry about how much I'm spending.
I'm not one to buy anything lavious, we live very modestly. I've never been one to flaunt it. When it comes to paying bills or what ever we need, I have the money to do so comfortably with out feeling robbed. Nothing wrong with having money, keeping your head about it is the key.
Siouxie921
Ms. Goldsmith - so happy to see your byline.
Your book Little Gloria, Happy at Last is one of my absolute favorites. Have read numerous times.
sophia5
One wonders what kind of person Michael Jackson would be if he had a so-called "normal" upbringing. He's the poster child for "Money Can't Buy Happiness." What did he see in the mirror that compelled him to make such drastic physical changes over the years? I'm guessing he would have traded a "normal" childhood for all his fame and money.
zoeybrookshire
"We shall not see her like again" ? Good Grief, let's hope not.
akutger
I think both the very rich and the very poor are removed from society (not "high society"). The rich never have to see poverty or interact with "real" people, never have to experience need (except, perhaps, for the need for love). The poor are stuck in blighted neighborhoods with little or no access to a good education, cultural experiences, travel, or interaction with people outside of their enclaves.
kansasrefugee
Ms. Goldsmith writes: "Buffet's children now have lots of money, but I remember reading an article early on where his daughter was quoted as saying she didn't really want a fortune from him but would appreciate enough to paint the kitchen."
I read recently that in fact Buffet's children did NOT have lots of money and, now well into midlife, they have some resentment about it - hence the daughter's comment that she would appreciate enough to paint the kitchen.
Is there a fact-checker at the Daily Beast? Does Ms. Goldsmith check her facts?
monkeyman
One premise that is helpful in understanding the opulently rich is that the majority of them emulate the monarchs of history, in that they come to believe they truly deserve the absolute best of everything all the time, regardless of who or how many suffer for it. Most of them, even those who practice philanthropy, believe the rest of us are here to fulfill their needs and wishes, no matter how extravagant.
BrittWalker
I love, love, loved "Little Gloria Happy at Last"!
flyoverland
Here's what being rich means to me. When I go to McDonald's, I get whatever I want. I always fill up my gas tank (never ten bucks worth), I know if the furnace breaks I can get it fixed and my big luxury is I only buy hard cover books...no more paperback with the small type. The difference between me having been poor, then rich is I don't sweat it as much as the "born rich". I know I can live poor if I have to. I've already done it. They can't imagine it.
Forestroot
Read Ms. Goldsmith's essay closely as a precursor to my new book entitled: WHY POOR PEOPLE ARE SO HAPPY--A PERSONAL ACCOUNT.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.