Blogs and Stories

Tina Brown

9/11 in Reverse

Article - Brown Obama Speech Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images As Obama euphoria crescendos with the inauguration, the man himself has become more serious and purposeful than ever.

It struck me as the Marine band played and I joined the river of people heading up C Street away from the west front of the capital. This was 9/11 in reverse. The last time I turned round and saw so many people behind me, it was that terrible day in New York when the twin towers burned and we poured out of our offices downtown and swarmed up Fifth Avenue. Then the faces were distraught. Now they were joyful. Then America had been assaulted by terror. Now it had been renewed by hope. A mysterious exchange has already taken place between our burdens and the president's demeanor. The more joyous we have become, the more sobriety Obama has assumed. His inaugural speech was free of literary exhibitionism. It was a litany of our challenges and his solemn promise to meet them. His words were purposeful, almost business-like, with the tautest of poetical flourishes.

The more joyous we have become, the more sobriety Obama has assumed.

And yet all day he was surrounded with astonishing poetic symbolism. Not only the helicopter bearing away the ills of his predecessor in democracy's spell-breaking moment of regenerative wizardry, but the high drama of the old democratic guard itself, Senators Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd literally collapsing as the torch was passed to the new generation. The physical transfer of power has marked the passage of eras before—from the Southern sympathizer James Buchanan to Abraham Lincoln; from Dwight Eisenhower, the heroic general, who as president presided as a figure of reassurance and complacency to John F. Kennedy, the young war hero who blew the bugle for action. From George H.W. Bush, the last World War II president and representative of Wasp ascendancy, to Bill Clinton, the first Baby Boomer president who had never served in the military. But Obama represents the new both in his person and himself. The first African-American president, the first digitally wired president and the first president who has seemed to be in charge from the day he was elected, not, like other presidents from the day he was sworn in. The rest of the world, of course, elected him a year ago and have just been waiting to see their longing ratified.

As our relief exploded yesterday into national outpourings of relief, we have watched the new young president elect become daily more cognizant of the burdens facing him.

On Inauguration eve, I attended a "bipartisan" black tie dinner for some of Obama's top donors at Union Station. It was a typically gracious gesture of the president-elect's inauguration planning to stage three dinners on the eve of the big day, one honoring Sen. John McCain, one Colin Powell, and one Joe Biden. It took grace too, for McCain, at any rate, to agree to be honored by the very man who beat him and the very people who had funded his political rout, but he agreed to be honored because he too understands that Obama is trying to live right from the start the bi-partisan rhetoric of his campaign. At the Union Station event Biden arrived in time for dinner looking handsome and proud escorting his wife and mother. He spoke of his determination to heal wounds across the aisle and the friendships he has with Chuck Hagel, Colin Powell, and John McCain, which he never lost sight of even in the harsh moments of the campaign. Obama himself appeared from behind the stage to speak of Biden and how his choice to make him vice president was informed as much by Biden's decency and belief that he would nurture relationships across the aisle as by his political gifts. Afterwards some of us got into line and had a picture with both of them. I was struck by how much less casual Obama looks behind the big, world beating smile. He exudes purpose and authority now. I told him my husband still has the contract he signed as president of Random House when their imprint Times Books acquired Dreams from My Father. "Worth something now, huh?" he told me, as he draped a long arm to gather me in between himself and his even taller vice president and easefully lit up for the camera. I felt safer and calmer than I have for eight years.

Tina Brown is the founder and editor-in-chief of The Daily Beast. She is the author of the 2007 New York Times best seller The Diana Chronicles. Brown is the former editor of Tatler, Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, and Talk magazines and host of CNBC's Topic A with Tina Brown. She has written for numerous publications, including The Times of London, The Spectator, and The Washington Post.


Back to Top
January 20, 2009 | 4:08pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

eggsem

Excellent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And I voted for Mccain!!

|
|
Reply
6:34 pm, Jan 20, 2009

JohnLloyd

You're doing a great thing here,Tina.

|
|
Reply
6:51 pm, Jan 20, 2009

larry278

Yes, you have written well & assembled a tour de force of web delivery of news. You have given your competition a worthy example of coverage of a big news event. Your competition will try to better your efforts. And this competition will better web news gathering, organizing & distribution. That was your plan. When everybody aims at bettering their personal best, it is exciting.

|
|
Reply
6:57 pm, Jan 20, 2009

Bluesky

I suppose it is the difference between running for the CEO position and actually getting it. Yesterday, BO was out selling himself to get the top job and today, after he won the CEO position, he is bringing in line people's expectations. Being CEO can be a sobering experience.

|
|
Reply
10:48 pm, Jan 20, 2009

finderj

How can he not be more somber? As a candidate, he did not have access to all the information he has today, all the top-secret stuff. Sounds like a silly movie line, excpet that much of the intelligence that governs decision-making is top secret of necessity. Now, Mr. Obama knows what he did not know before, and if it isn't sobering, he isn't the man for the job. Nice to know he is taking it seriously.

|
|
Reply
12:11 am, Jan 21, 2009

Pragmatic1st

Thank so much for this webzine it is truly a fount for the intellectually news hungry.. I for one do not feel safe yet. I do know that with President Obama we do stand a chance to feel that way again

|
|
Reply
2:53 am, Jan 21, 2009

writerforhire

I hope that Obama is not a rhetoric kind of person. His speech called for unpopular choices and didn't invoke easy street addresses.

Calling for the rule of law to be adhered and enforced in a time of lush corporate greed, when separate laws exists for the common citizen and no law for others, when terror is redefined to become palatable to disenfranchised and hate groups breed with amazing fortitude, when those of superior intellect fall to the common con and jeopardize their futures for a few minutes of illegal fun, is not going to be an easy enforceable pledge. I hope, and refused all day to catch the hype of hope wave, that he can enforce the rule of law in this land.

|
|
Reply
7:41 am, Jan 21, 2009

Margot62

Oh, Tina. Has anyone around here not sipped the Kool-aid? I
find Joe Biden--and his wife--to be somewhat embarrassing. (Wasn't he the man who seemed so impressed during the campaign that Obama was so "clean?" And do you think his wife could have been any more ridiculous and clueless on Oprah?) If a conservative had just said his oath, you media folks would have had a hey-day with all of this, but of course, it hasn't been mentioned.

Were you not embarrassed by the Bush haters booing him during the ceremony? Forget what this chidish act says about Bush....what does it say about the booers? Have we no class?

Does it not bother anyone that in this time of financial fiasco we just witnessed the most expensive inauguration in history?

I'm all for passing the torch----yadda, yadda, yadda. But I'm not anxious to watch the next eight years turn into a circus. We have heaved so many expectations on this man---unfairly so. Let's get past the "lemony dresses" and the mad gushing and get back to the business of fixing our country. And it would be nice, too, if the media got back to doing its job with some objectivity-----if that's not too much to ask.

|
|
Reply
10:20 am, Jan 21, 2009

ScottRose

I wonder how the "reaching across the aisle" is going to pan out in practical terms.

There are Americans on the right with no intentions of compromising on their positions.

You can not . . . for example . . . effectively smile and utter platitudes all day long in the face of people that want to argue that what we call "global warming" is not a scientifically-verified phenomenon.

At some point, you have to declare that you will not suffer any further arguments from people arguing counter to the science; only then may meaningful debate occur.

Also, when it comes to various classes of bigotry, I don't want somebody "reaching across the aisle." I want somebody forcefully stating that bigotry is wrong. A lot of anti-immigrant feeling is a cover for anti-Latino hatred. That social atmosphere has led to widespread abuses and even murders of working class Latinos. That population is now terrorized within our borders while those doing the terrorizing feel not only justified but actually empowered by the system.

I do not want to reach across the aisle to hateful reactionaries that do not respect the human rights of people within our borders.

Yes, this is a moment of great uplift for those of us feeling it that way. But let's not forget that the ongoing victims of hate need for us to fight for them, not to "reach across the aisle" to those that would perpetuate their victimization.

|
|
Reply
10:46 am, Jan 21, 2009

motrbotr

OMG. Enough. Good lord. I hope he does a GREAT job as president! But give the man a chance to actually lead and govern before you start talking about clouds parting and angels trumpeting. Good grief. He's not in office a full day and already im sick of it. I HOPE he does a good job but count me as one who is NOT full of hope.

|
|
Reply
12:47 pm, Jan 21, 2009

woodnut

Margot62 did you volunteer to help at the inauguration to keep the cost of the celebration down?
Instead of griping I think helping would be more productive.
But if we all helped there wouldn't be anything to gripe about.
BUMMER

|
|
Reply
1:13 pm, Jan 21, 2009

ac-slater

Margot62 -

will you give it a rest already? i'm so sick of your mind-numbing posts that do nothing to generate actual debate on important issues. forget about the obama "kool-aid" you have been sucked in to the fox news/drudge report propaganda cycle from which most of the mainstream media has only recently been able to pry themselves.

if you don't like this site, which i do find *actually* balanced, you should find your news and punditry elswhere. i'm sick of your negative comments junking up actual thought. with the country in a financial mess and two quagmires, you can't find anything more productive to cite than audience members obama has no control over and a few harmless gaffes??

other conservative posters, please don't misread my comments and think that i don't appreciate a contrarian point of view. that is just what this country needs, as long as it is thought-provoking and stimulating. Margot62's comments have been about as insightful as if i were to go around posting how devilish cheney is for shooting his friend in the face on every bush article.

let's move past the rhetoric and get some real discussion going on.

|
|
Reply
1:21 pm, Jan 21, 2009

opedanderson

I was not a supporter of Obama. I wanted to see HRC in office and I still think she is better suited for the job than BO. Having said that, yesterday was a great day. And it is time to get going on fixing things after GW and his crew (though the House Dems and Senate Dems are not innocent in all the mess that has happened)

I am new to the Beast. I started coming here after seeing Ms. Brown on Morning Joe. I was a huge fan of MSNBC until they totally threw themselves in the tank for BO. They are no longer journalists but advocates for one point of view. It is ironic for MSNBC to criticize Fox News so much since they have become just like them!

Please don't become like that. There are 2 sides or more to every issue. Stay impartial......

|
|
Reply
2:04 pm, Jan 21, 2009

AndreainNY

ac-slater: I have to admit I'm not familiar with this poster's other comments, but I find myself agreeing with her assessment of Biden. He doesn't know when to stop talking -- and, obviously, neither does his wife.

And, if you recall, some in the media made a fuss about the expense of Bush's inauguration when we were at war. Is it not understandable that some might see the expenditures on this event just a tad excessive? Yes, it's historic and profoundly important -- but these are seriously trying economic times.

And, despite your being "sick" of certain posters, everyone has a right to post here. Don't be like so many other people who can't stand hearing viewpoints they don't agree with. Who can post here is, quite frankly, not yours to decide.

|
|
Reply
2:11 pm, Jan 21, 2009

ac-slater

AndreainNY, i guess you didn't read my entire post. of course margot 62 has a right to post here, and i don't have a problem with the fact that we would probably disagree on many things. what i'm sick of are the superficial, blindly loyal arguments that she(?) keeps putting forward. don't get me wrong, this happens on BOTH sides and what i would like to call for is a civil discussion from both.

the point you bring up about the expense of the inauguration is valid. to be honest, i am not really happy about it. i have, however, heard about just as much flack from the media (excluding MSNBC) about obama's inagural costs as 2005, from what i can remember.

i will say this... the money raised was in an open and honest forum, and only collected from individuals (as opposed to lobbyists and corporations expecting favorable legislation in return) with a maximum cap. this inauguration also provided an unprecedented amount of free events that were open to the public (which was an also unprecedented amount of attendees). add to that -- the highest expense of the celebrations went to security, which i hope everyone agrees is a necessary expenditure.

i welcome anyone's response to this. i just hope they actually make a point.

|
|
Reply
4:34 pm, Jan 21, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

9/11 in Reverse

by Tina Brown

Info
RSS
Tina Brown
Emails
|
print
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |