Blogs and Stories

Reihan Salam

Sarah, You Blew It

Sarah Palin Anchorage Daily News, MCT / Landov Conservative blogger Reihan Salam once loudly backed America's hockey mom. But as her botched return to Alaska gets even messier, he's ready for a divorce.

Levi Johnston, a 19-year-old with a perhaps undeserved reputation as a backwoods simpleton, has done what Barack Obama and Joe Biden and sneering liberals and cringing conservatives couldn’t: He has killed off Sarah Palin as a serious contender for the next Republican presidential nomination. And I have to say, this depresses the hell out of me.

By now everyone knows about Johnston’s on-again, off-again romance with Palin’s daughter Bristol. During the campaign, the fact that Bristol was pregnant with Johnston’s child sparked a minor culture war, with pro-lifers rallying to the Palin family’s defense while a coalition of censorious snobs from the left and the right blasted Bristol for her irresponsibility. Back then, the official line from the Palins was that Levi and Bristol were getting married—and indeed, Levi had an elaborate finger tattoo to prove it. At the time, I found the Bristol-Levi story incredibly affecting. Here were two kids who were probably in over their heads, but they were trying to make it work. And here is this big, sprawling, weird, wonderful American family that had their backs during this completely wrenching time. Palin came across as a different kind of Republican, and her slightly messy life seemed to prove it.

Since returning to Alaska, one can’t help but get the impression that Palin is a clownish, vindictive amateur.

But sure enough, like so many young loves, the engagement later dissolved. Instead of just giving his would-be in-laws the stink-eye over Thanksgiving dinner, Levi lashed out at supposedly snobbish Sarah on the Tyra Banks show. Inevitably, the Palins counterattacked, and the whole tawdry episode has given the Republican elite—those mysterious, shadowy pointy-heads who control the purse strings—second and third thoughts about Project Palin.

This is only the latest indignity in the long, slow downward spiral that’s been Palin’s brief career as a national figure, as everything clever and distinctive about her has been replaced by an unrecognizable Reaganite fembot caricature. Months before Palin was selected as McCain’s running mate, I told anyone who’d listen that she’d be the shrewdest pick. When she addressed the Republican National Convention in Saint Paul, I was utterly electrified. But during the latter days of the campaign, I started hearing rumors about how top-level McCain backers were shuttling back-and-forth to Alaska to put out various fires, and of course there has been a steady drumbeat of stories about Palin’s low-level abuse of power. Then there is the fact that the national Republican Party has destroyed much of what was great about Sarah Palin, and she let them do it.

For all its virtues, Alaska has a very quirky political culture, one that doesn’t always translate in the lower 48. At first, this was Palin’s strength. She wasn’t a Southern evangelical, a familiar—some would say overfamiliar—figure in Republican politics. Rather, she was a Northern evangelical, with an accent that almost made her sound like a Minnesotan. Despite her meteoric rise as a foot soldier of Wasilla’s Christian right, she also cut a strangely post-partisan figure in her early days as governor. As she told The New Yorker’s Philip Gourevitch long before she was selected as McCain’s running mate, she was actually glad that Barack Obama was polling well in Alaska because it represented a challenge to the status quo. Suffice to say, most rising Republican stars would stick to praising John McCain.

Palin was quirky in another respect: Recognizing that Alaska had to carve out its own path, she broke with Beltway Republicans in supporting a windfall-profits tax on oil companies among other populist measures. But once Palin signed up as McCain’s running mate, she couldn’t talk up the windfall-profits tax, one of her central accomplishments, because the Republicans in Congress bitterly opposed it. Palin also had a gift for communicating policy details in homespun language. Soon after meeting the McCain team, she reportedly pressed for proposals that she could sell to working mothers and small-business owners and other key constituencies. The sad truth is that the McCain platform, a mish-mash that reflected the often-contradictory input of dozens of advisers and donors, didn’t give her much to work with. Sarah Palin thus became red meat for the base—the pitbull with lipstick.

Palin’s campaign antics can be forgiven. What can’t be forgiven is the ham-handed way she’s tried to build her national profile since she returned to Alaska. She’s abandoned the bold right-left populism that won over Alaska voters—and me—in the first place in favor of an increasingly defensive and harsh partisanship. After making her name as a determined enemy of Alaska’s corrupt Republican establishment, she recently called for Democratic Sen. Mark Begich to step down so the hilariously crooked Ted Stevens could get another crack at the seat. She loudly promised to leave federal stimulus money on the table before clawing that promise back with a whimper. One can’t help but get the impression that Palin is a clownish, vindictive amateur.

Now, for example, Palin is raising hackles for naming colorful crackpot Wayne Anthony Ross to be Alaska’s attorney general. It turns out that Palin may have consulted with Ross over a state senate appointment, a move that would have been against state law. As a general matter, state law is something you might want your AG to be on top of.

What I’m wondering is: Has Sarah Palin undergone some kind of secret lobotomy?

Reihan Salam is a fellow at The America Foundation and the co-author of Grand New Party.


Back to Top
April 16, 2009 | 12:39pm
Comments ()

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
9:44 am, Apr 16, 2009
FNYGY1

I believe, frankly, that you fooled yourself into seeing things in Palin that were never there. Everything you describe as "new" is what I saw in the first place. It has nothing to do with partisanship and everything to do with human nature. Denial is a coping mechanism we all use to cope with a disappointing or painful reality. The painful reality of 2008 (for Republicans) was that it simply wasn't your year. Oh well.

From my vantage point (as a committed independent) the GOP has a lot more work to do than they seem to think. I believe the failure was in their modern take on conservatism - which I perceive as a free market/anti tax fetish.

Give me some good NEW ideas about actually governing (rather than anti-government rhetoric) and some interesting people to deliver that message and I'll be all ears.

|
|
Reply
|
9:44 am, Apr 16, 2009
JohnnyAces

From another "committed independent" .......Alleluia

|
|
Reply
9:19 am, Apr 17, 2009
OHNOTAGAIN

Yes,
Her initial approach turned me off. Talking down to Community Organizers when she started in public office as a PTA President!! After that statement, I really could not hear anything else she had to offer. It should me that she was a divider not someone that would bring the Country together.

|
|
Reply
|
9:58 am, Apr 17, 2009
possumdearie

Palin began her political career as a PTA mom. She never "talked down" to community organizers. She denounced rent-a-mobs like ACORN and MoveOn.org.

|
12:35 pm, Apr 17, 2009
rivenburgh

The Community Organizer crack was just one of many nasty, unpleasant attacks in her convention speech. (Yes, possumdearie, she did make fun of Obama's time as an organizer.) The right wingers ate it up, but many of us were forever turned off after that.

|
10:14 pm, Apr 17, 2009
NDeeeZ

Possumdearie--

She RELENTLESSLY lampooned and mocked community organizers! It was red meat to her followers, and she played every card she had, whether they were true or not! "Thanks, but no thanks" ring a bell?

And I agree with others; she didn't have a 'secret lobotomy;' you, Reihan, fell out of love with her and began seeing what the rest of us had seen from almost the first foot she put in her mouth!

|
11:33 am, Apr 18, 2009
communityguy

@possumdearie

"Palin began her political career as a PTA mom."

And I began my career in marketing buy products.

"She never "talked down" to community organizers. She denounced rent-a-mobs like ACORN and MoveOn.org."

Are. You. Kidding?? Watch her convention speech again.

|
3:28 pm, Apr 18, 2009
bobmart

Talk about a divider!!!! Mr. Obama has set this country back 50 years. Martin Luther King must be turning over in his grave. In less than 100 days look what he has done. His administration has called a segment of U.S. citizens TERRORIST. Martin Luther King marched against Goverment policy, today Obama would consider him Terrorist Number One!!!!!!!!!

Bigdog

|
4:45 pm, Apr 18, 2009
Sandras

To Bobmart who says: "His [Obama's] administration has called a segment of U.S. citizens TERRORIST." Well,Mr. Bobmart: duh, there is a segment of U.S. citizens that are domestic terrorists - they are the right wing extremists that spawned the likes of TImothy McVeigh, and if Obama's administration is working to ensure this never happens again, well, I think that either you are just another partisan obstructionist who spouts idealogy over the well being of his country - or, you are a member of the right wing.

|
3:01 pm, Apr 19, 2009
possumdearie

Rivenburgh and Communityguy, I have watched the RNC convention speech several times, and when she makes fun of Obama's stint as a community organizer (in response to several digs about her being the mayor of a small town), she said the difference between being mayor and a community organizer is that one has actual RESPONSIBILITY.

Meaning one is an elected official accountable to their constituents, while the other registers dead people, pets and the Dallas Cowboys to vote in crooked elections.

Sandras, Explain to me why every person on the FBI Most Wanted List is a left-wing exremist but yet, the FBI have none of your so-called "right-wing extremists" even on their watch list?

Four from ELF or ALF, two Black Liberation Army Members and four Communist radicals.

wwwDOTfbiDOTgov/wanted/fugitives/dt/fug_dtDOThtm

This DHS "report" is a farce. You know it. I know it, and everyone else knows it.

|
6:31 pm, Apr 19, 2009
orsay54

So True. This author deluded himself into making her what he wanted her to be. Her antics COULD NOT BE FORGIVEN & WERE NOT FORGIVEN!!..We saw what the author REFUSED to see, until she SLAPPED his sensibilities in the face. To me the slap was at the Republican convention speech. For the author to say her antics could be forgiven is quite naive, in this era of partisanship!!

|
10:04 am, Apr 22, 2009
schmoozercp

I am a Liberal Democrat residing in Georgia. One of the few. The many Conservative Republicans who I know and there are plenty to go around here, cannot get over the fact that they had their asses kicked this past November. My answer to them has been. The GOP and the associated voters picked a tired old man with a tired old message as their Presidential candidate, then they picked a Vice Presidential candidate with no message at all.

I agree with the statements made by FNYGY1, Palin is an empty suit.
Is now and always has been.

The Democratic party ran a flawless campaign, President Obama never lost his cool, he was able to stay on message, the timing was perfect, considering the Bush years, the dismal approval rating, etc., etc., etc.

Just what did the GOP expect? They received what they asked for. Now Palin is crying about the defeat and how she was treated. Pull up your Big Girl Pants Sarah and go home. It is my hope that she does run for national office again then we will have another look at a truly inept person. The GOP is leaderless now, they rolled out Bobby Jindal not long ago with the luke warm speech. What a weak transparent effort. Is that the best of the GOP? Well I guess it is.

It is my hope that all the Republicans stay miserable for at least the next 8 years.

|
|
Reply
7:47 pm, Apr 20, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
9:53 am, Apr 16, 2009
whatchutalkinbout

A secret lobotomy?? No - she's the same old reckless, feckless, entitled and arrogant dumb dumb she's ever been. You just woke up and smelled the coffee! Good Morning!

|
|
Reply
|
9:55 am, Apr 16, 2009
zanbyrd

Yes, "Reaganite fembot caricature" is so perfect!

|
|
Reply
|
6:20 pm, Apr 16, 2009
drkaza12

she's more like a joseph mccarthyite fembot. but the question is why does the right wing hate America?

|
1:28 am, Apr 19, 2009
blackdog2

You are absolutely right! She was dumb from day one. Some people were in major denial. It's not like we can't say "told you so!"

|
|
Reply
|
12:58 am, Apr 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
11:31 pm, Apr 17, 2009
VenusMuse

dumb? who's calling Palin dumb?

wake up! Palin is quite an accomplished and successful woman, not to mention she can run rings with her speechs (no teleprompter needed) around Obama.

|
5:00 pm, Apr 19, 2009
TheRamblingExpatriate

@ whatchutalkinbout - Exactly right.... some are finally waking as the "kool-aid" fumes of the last years finally evaporate. Through a foggy stupor some are realizing... Hmmm if it walk, talks and acts like an egotistical and selfish idiot, perhaps it is one.

.... come to the light, it's safe in the light.

|
|
Reply
|
12:06 pm, Apr 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
11:32 pm, Apr 17, 2009
persimmonmuse

It always has been painful for me to see Sara Palin as a public official. From the moment she opened her mouth I saw and felt her as one of the most immature and unwise women in the public eye.

For her own sake she should not be given any type of power...as she is not intelligent or experienced in life to deal with it constructively. Given any type of power she becomes vindictive and a tyrant. She has little to no discrimination.

And one of the tests of maturity is to take personal criticism...something this woman has not a clue how to do.

|
|
Reply
6:43 pm, Apr 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
11:31 pm, Apr 17, 2009
carolr51

I never did get why anyone ever took her seriously. I had never heard of her, but her speech at the Repulican Convention told me what I needed to know.

|
|
Reply
2:08 am, Apr 18, 2009
connie47

Speaking as an independent, I never did see what others saw in her. The ability to deliver a red meat partisan speech with great passion does not interest me in a candidate for higher office, but to give Mrs. Palin her due, she certainly did that with flair and style. Then she opened her mouth without a script and I completely lost interest in and respect for her, and I was equally disappointed in the Republican Party because of their choice.

|
|
Reply
|
10:01 am, Apr 16, 2009
blackdog2

"Flair and style?" We weren't watching the same person obviously. All those tacky, immature comments about being a community organizer? Flair and style...I think not!

|
|
Reply
1:01 am, Apr 17, 2009
inexpugnable0199

Flair and Style is doublespeak for "hot as hell"

|
|
Reply
4:10 pm, Apr 17, 2009
DeeAmbro

That is the problem in a nutshell. We (voters) have let them (the power brokers) give us personalities instead of substance. Yes, Sarah was a very good actress...just like Ronnie and Arnold. But actors don't make good leaders. When will we learn? Maybe we have. The greatest sexual political come-on failed!

|
|
Reply
11:09 am, Apr 18, 2009
leslie1

You have to have a brain to perform a lobotomy.

|
|
Reply
|
10:02 am, Apr 16, 2009
MoeJoe

Bummer... you beat me to the punch, but it is as simple as that!

|
|
Reply
2:06 pm, Apr 16, 2009
muddog

Reihan.

Even a cursory look when she was running for President, err I mean Vice President one could surely tell she was totally out of her league. But the G.O.P. had to "prop" up a Woman to compete with Hillary who they thought early on would take the nomination ( not so much ), then they "propped" up an African American Michael Steel to show how "Diverse" they are. Simply inserting a candidate ( fill in the blank ) to instantly transform your party is cheap and frankly stupid.

The Hypocrisy is so blatant, can you imagine if the Obama's had 5 kids and one was pregnant out of wedlock by some black thug???? But if you are white, a little slow and hunt, then you are forgiven, heck you are CELEBRATED!!.

Sarah Palin has not had some secret lobotomy, she is as stupid now as she was 6 months ago.

Her campaign "Antics" cannot be forgiven, it shows that the G.O.P. still thinks this is 1994, sorry but the world has changed and your age is showing. The G.O.P. has to rid itself of the wingnut base, or @ least minimize it's whacky tendencies in order to survive, as a life long Democrat I hope the G.O.P. comes back a stronger, smarter and more enlightened party, but with Palin, Limbaugh, Coulter, Fox New, Michelle Malkin etc etc etc one wonders.........

Enjoy the wilderness...

|
|
Reply
|
10:14 am, Apr 16, 2009
DevilsLawyer

I lean left of center, and I hope the GOP can get itself to fighting trim, too. It's not the conservative party, it's now the party of nuts. There's been an exodus of non-nutty conservatives to the Democratic Party, resulting in that party's lack of policy coherence. That's why the real policy debates are taking place between Democrats, and not between Democrats and Republicans.

|
|
Reply
12:13 am, Apr 17, 2009
ladybastet

"The Hypocrisy is so blatant, can you imagine if the Obama's had 5 kids and one was pregnant out of wedlock by some black thug???? But if you are white, a little slow and hunt, then you are forgiven, heck you are CELEBRATED!!."

AMEN to that! As a lifelong Dem myself, I have to say that is the most accurate assessment there has been since the election itself. It amazes me how many evangelical right-wing nutcases forget that "the truth will set you free."

As for the article itself, I tried to read it from the perspective of a republican, which I am not so it doesn't come so easy. =/ At any rate, I respect what seemed to me to be a fairly open and honest expression of your view of Gov. Palin. That gives me further hope that there are people on the right that don't continually remain blinded by partisan agenda - something both sides can be guilty of, but it does seem that we Dems are more readily able to admit when someone in our party is wrong (Rod Blagojevich, Joe Lieberman, et al.).

I can honestly say that I was never very impressed with Palin at all. No, not because I'm a Democrat - I have respect for many Repubs like Olympia Snowe even if I don't agree with their views. In fact I was totally confused why everyone seemed to be so impressed by her first speech. It was harsh, polarizing, divisive, and sarcastic. It left me with nothing more than a look of disgust on my face. She didn't even deliver it well! She was overly stiff and came across as insincere. It was obvious she wasn't the author of the speech. (I know politicians rarely are but they usually can deliver a speech in such a way as to cause one to overlook this.) Compared to the speeches she gave on the campaign trail I found her convention speech to be shameful, but to be fair as she got her feet wet campaigning she came across with more of the lively passion that seems to be one of her stronger abilities.

Now after the campaign is over she still fumes about the Katie Couric interviews and SNL. It's funny how she didn't seem to mind going on snl so much and kept talking to the press dispite claiming there was a "media filter," or at least talked to the press as much as the McCain campaign seemed to let her - their reluctance raised many eyebrows.

Simply put: she was a disaster and if the GOP does want to have a headstone with RIP on it they're going to have to find someone that can do more than "fire up the base."

|
|
Reply
11:49 am, Apr 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
11:36 pm, Apr 17, 2009
maryyooch

You just nailed it!
The speech Painlin gave at the RNC was a total turnoff. I am so sick and tired of divisive politics. Why can't they respectfully run on real issues instead of social opinions? The GOP wants smaller goverment, but at the same time they want to regulate our bodies and sex lives. How about regulating the crooks on Wall St and the souless bastards that tried to authorize torture!?!

|
|
Reply
1:25 pm, Apr 19, 2009
whatchutalkinbout

Undergone a secret lobotomy?? No...she's the same old reckless, feckless, arrogant, entitled dumb dumb she's always been....you just woke up and smelled the coffee! Good Morning Reihan!

|
|
Reply
10:16 am, Apr 16, 2009
AndreainNY

Palin spoke to a certain group of Americans. That group has been consistently ridiculed, which is unfortunate.

Maybe Palin supporters simply do not appreciate being spoken down to and were happy to have someone who finally understood them and respected their values.

I wasn't a Palin supporter once I had some time to evaluate her, but I always sympathized with her supporters. They were, and still are, trashed on a regular basis.

|
|
Reply
|
10:20 am, Apr 16, 2009
bluehawaii

They haven't been trashed remotely as much as they deserve to be.

The right-wingers will loudly tell you that there's no such thing as a free lunch, but then they assert that the brainless are automatically entitled to respect.

|
|
Reply
|
10:30 am, Apr 16, 2009
AndreainNY

They don't deserve to be trashed. You should examine your need to trash them. Would this be the same need to judge and denigrate that you despise in her supporters?

Many of the people criticizing Palin are rather nasty and not quite as intelligent-sounding as they might think they are.


|
10:20 pm, Apr 16, 2009
namedujour

Do you really think Sarah Palin didn't "speak down" to her supporters? Everything she said was in the tone and cadence of a mother serving peanut butter and jelly to a six-year-old. Listen to clips of her talking to and about the "good American people." Listen to her tone when she talks about that bad man, Barack Obama, and those bad people, the Democrats. It would have been jaw-droppingly condescending, had Sarah been consciously simpering to Republicans, instead of just moving her roll of "mom" to the national stage.

And Republicans ate it up. All that comfort food.

Then Dad (John McCain) came up and made speeches, and answered questions as if he were reading Republicans a bedtime story. Listen to the clips and the sing-song in his voice. I'm serious. Replace all his talk about national security with The Three Bears and see if his tones aren't appropriate for a fairy tale. (And that creepy smile...consider having that corpse grin looking down at you as you get ready for sleep...)

This parental concern you picked up from them was all on a subconscious level, mind you. Unless you snapped yourself out of "Make it better, Mommy and Daddy," and listened to them with your intellect, as an adult, you could get sucked into it, as so many were.

Yikes. I'm so glad Palin is taking a political dive. She was some scary stuff. Finally Republicans are shaking loose of that "feel good" trance and listening to the words.

|
|
Reply
|
7:51 am, Apr 17, 2009
DeaconDrJones

Listen to Bush's yellow cake speech. Same bedtime story! I think you nailed it.

|
9:13 am, Apr 17, 2009
possumdearie

"Yes, We Can!" isn't patronizing? It's lighter than The Little Engine Who Could. It wasn't even original; Obama lifted that from Cesar Chavez.

|
12:37 pm, Apr 17, 2009
rivenburgh

And let's not forget Jindal's Mr. Rogers speech. Apparently the right-wing base just wants to be told it's going to be okay, there there.... We'll get those nasty liberals and terrorists and scientists.

|
10:18 pm, Apr 17, 2009
possumdearie

Listening to Jindal speak makes watching paint dry an adrenaline rush by comparison. That being said, he's been pretty easy on Obama, he is a frightfully smart man, and he's a good Governor in Louisiana.

|
12:47 pm, Apr 19, 2009
vi-lontano


I think think what you are actually seeing is a back lash.

The radical right, which is Palin's base, have been trashing the rest of America for years....
if we are not evangelical Christians who believe George Bush is/was the prophet of God and have the Audacity to exercise our first amendment right (they only seem to acknowledge the sanctity of the second amendment, and a distorted interpretation at that) to political speech we were/are:
Godless
immoral
anti-American
traitors
treasonous
emboldening our enemies
communists (read Democrats)
socialists (read Democrats)
terrorists (read Democrats...
yada yada yada

with that said I agree
the way to "defeat" this rigid, isolated portion of American society is to treat them better then they treat us...
....yes they are very rigidly conservative but mostly they are scared that diversity means their "way of life" will be marginalized...
and they fear this because they are clearly a minority in the American landscape
But they still need jobs, health care, safety and education for their children
all areas of common political ground
and I think most Americans do believe that respecting our differences is what makes us great....and that we disagree with them but that does not believe we need to wipe them off the face of the earth (which is of course what they seem to want to do to us : )

|
|
Reply
|
12:49 pm, Apr 17, 2009
inexpugnable0199

You are a very nice person.

|
4:14 pm, Apr 17, 2009
redshoes

And the far left has only had nice things to say.

|
10:46 pm, Apr 19, 2009
inexpugnable0199

The fact that she speaks stupidese should not be a political qualification.

|
|
Reply
4:12 pm, Apr 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
10:23 am, Apr 16, 2009
Twisted

This author is a delusional simpleton, Sarah and first dude Todd Palin embody all the traits of trailerpark culture and intelligence. Refusal to adhere to the rule of law and blatant racism aren't the traits i look for in a leader. Ms palin's lack of education and culture should have been a dead give away for anybody. Don't admit you supported her you make yourself sound very stupid.

|
|
Reply
|
10:35 am, Apr 16, 2009
Hawnzz

This author is actually a very smart man. Perhaps he wanted to see things that weren't there, but don't we all do that? I'd seen this author speak and have been impressed. (And I'm not impressed easily... )

|
|
Reply
|
12:36 pm, Apr 16, 2009
cbeenthere

You might want to see the New America Foundation site. Rachel Maddow had someone on last night from there, and I was impressed with him.

|
1:07 pm, Apr 16, 2009
yweston

You're right this author is smart. I've seen him on several programs. It amazes me that "smart people" could not see through Palin. That woman is driven by ambition. She was in no way ready for Prime Time. She never paid attention to "foreign" affairs until August 26. She came in swinging about Obama associates and look at the criminals in her family.

|
3:42 pm, Apr 16, 2009
DeaconDrJones

Even smart people can delude themselves. I wonder, am I one of his sneering liberals? (twirls mustache)

|
8:59 am, Apr 17, 2009
toad46

In some ways, maybe. But a really smart man would at least consider the possibility that his earlier admiration for Palin was misguided.

Instead, he focuses entirely on what he sees as changes in Palin. Maybe Palin hasn't changed, and is as ridiculous as she ever was, but Salam can't bring himself to even mention the possibility that he was wrong. That's not the mark of a reflective, intelligent, individual.

|
3:00 pm, Apr 23, 2009
jaguarxjs

Well, this is what happens when you support a vacuous idiot. Live and learn, live and learn.

|
|
Reply
10:47 am, Apr 16, 2009
museweaver

And folks this is why we must so careful about what we read & who we believe...This yahoo blogger is now disappointed in Sarah---boo hoo--Get this, 'he's a fellow at The America Foundation'...sounds impressive, yes...I bet it did when/if you ever read any of his bloggings before Sarah's idiot non-son-in- law disillusioned him...poor fellow....taken in by Sarah's bullshit and now he's sad cuz a 19 year twit kid revealed something about this wacked out family that this blogger now thinks will keep Sarah out of the White House---remember this, fellow, the next time you get seduced by a woman....I bet this very informed fellow from the american foundation gets worked by women all the time...anything for a little attention, eh fellow?

|
|
Reply
|
10:49 am, Apr 16, 2009
cbeenthere

Rachel Maddow had Steve Clemons on last night from the New America Foundation. I was impressed with him. I had never heard of this foundation before, and am always cautious about so named "groups". I am going to follow Rachel's lead, but will be sure to check this author out. Not impressed with his reasoning so far, but will check it out.

|
|
Reply
12:50 pm, Apr 16, 2009
Redhead5050

This woman is too stupid to know that she is making a fool of herself. Give it up, sarah and go hunting. You seem to think you are good at that too....

|
|
Reply
|
10:57 am, Apr 16, 2009
GeorgeB

I like her because she gives hunting a bad name.

|
|
Reply
12:56 pm, Apr 16, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
11:06 am, Apr 16, 2009
Kirbonicus

Isn't it all so clear now... so obvious?

McCain never wanted to win the 2008 Presidential Election in the first place. He knew that his time should have been in 2000 (and I agree) but he was derailed by the GOP higher-ups who wanted a face with a name who could be easily controlled... who would accept one of their own (Cheney) in the White House with him... *ta-da* Bush Jr.

McCain was never going to win... be it against Hillary or Obama. The Obama people obviously knew this being that they never even 'vetted' Hillary for the VP spot, a winning ticket without a doubt, because they could win without her and not have to give in to the 'Clinton People'. So they picked Biden... a smart foreign policy guy but a bit loopy overall... a 'safe' pick.

I have always liked McCain. He almost lost me with the campaign that was run in his name, but after losing he immediately shut up about it and went back to being the McCain of old. I can appreciate that.

McCain never really tried. He was too old to play the game like it's played now. It has even changed dramatically since 2000. His heart was never in it. He knew that Obama was the face of the future. He put up a weak fight. And him picking her for VP... how could that EVER have worked in this political climate? He had to have known that, the political veteran that he is.

Bravo to McCain.

|
|
Reply
|
11:13 am, Apr 16, 2009
SFGiants

Kirbonicus: A startling and interesting idea. But I have to say that the same thought crossed my mind a couple of times during the presidential campaign--in part because it sometimes seemed that McCain was just going through the motions, and in part because he made the bizarre pick of an obviously unqualified Sarah Palin.

|
|
Reply
|
8:51 pm, Apr 16, 2009
Kirbonicus

That was when it hit me... after thinking for a bit after him picking her for VP. That was when I first thought that he was throwing it. More specifically, right after her speech that day... a very partisan speech by a rookie politician who was supposedly into bipartianship. That speech was very unlike McCain, and the campaign turned into something the 2000 McCain would have cringed at.

As for me for now, I am right behind Obama. I like his ideas, and him seemingly running a very non-partisan administration. Seems funny to me... the 'nuts' have taken over the GOP in response to a Democrat who is very well liked running a rather centrist regime. The early potential nominee seems to be Gingrich, 'a repentant sinner', but I won't count out Huckabee or Paul or some other fringe name given the direction the GOP has taken.

|
10:21 pm, Apr 16, 2009
jobert

I disagree. I liked McCain a lot until that election. I don't believe he was throwing it. I believe he realized he would lose after he picked Palin and then got to know her. Perhaps he even realized how dangerous it could be if he became president with her as VP. She wasn't ready. People may like her, and that's fine, but there is no way she could have taken over as president if the need arose.

Another point: McCain was angry a lot in the debates. It was clear he could not stand the sight of Obama.

I would pay a lot of money to know what was really going on in McCain's mind during the campaign.

I have not regained my trust or respect for him yet. He disappointed me so much. And if he did realize eventually how disastrous his choice was, he should have done the patriotic thing and admitted it.

|
11:55 am, Apr 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
11:46 pm, Apr 17, 2009
possumdearie

Steve Schmidt, former Reagan campaign manager, picked Palin.

|
6:34 pm, Apr 19, 2009
DevilsLawyer

I thought Jon Stewart hit it on the head when he deadpanned after an embarrassing McCain campaign clip: "You don't even want this anymore, do you?"

If the GOP had been a different party, we would have had President Gore or President McCain from at least 2000 to 20004. Godless librul though I am, I would have been fine with either outcome--it was the weaselly Texas governor that I never trusted. Ah, the might-have-beens.

|
|
Reply
12:18 am, Apr 17, 2009
DeaconDrJones

Hillary's campaign also imploded, do you think she purposefully appropriated Bushisms to turn off people like me who would have supported her?
For me, the most powerful moment of the McCain campaign was when that elderly woman at one of the town halls said (with obvious fear and disdain) that Obama was a muslim (with the same level of disgust as if she was calling him a molester) and McCain just deflated and told the audience (to boos) that Obama was not a terrorist, not a muslim, and not going to destroy the county. Palin never came clean like that, but she didn't the general good will that McCain had to loose, she's just starting on the national scene and she has very little besides right-wing bile to offer.

|
|
Reply
|
9:05 am, Apr 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
11:58 pm, Apr 17, 2009
southernyankee

I feel the religious right was praying hard that McCain would win and die in office then they would have the president they really wanted. Thank god it didn't happen. I am sure many republicans voted for Obama just so Palin didn't make it.

|
5:26 pm, Apr 18, 2009
possumdearie

"Carpetbagger" is the correct name for a southern Yankee. I'm hardly the religious type, though I believe in God and attend church at times, but I prayed Sarah Palin would be our VP. No Republicans voted for Obama *because* of her, though. The top of the ticket matters most, and voters stayed home because of McCain, especially after the week TARP was passed and he spectacularly committed ritual hari kari.

|
12:52 pm, Apr 19, 2009
maryyooch

Bravo to McCain!?!??
He was just as nasty and hateful on the campaign trail as stupid sarah!
McCain said that he would run a respectful campaign. Where was the respect? McCain and his egocentric bit** Palin were literally inciting violence against President Obama! Or didn't you read the memo from the Secret Service telling them to tone it down?
Respect for McCain? My a$$!

|
|
Reply
|
1:35 pm, Apr 19, 2009
possumdearie

No, have you seen the memo from Secret Service telling McCain to tone it down? Because it seems as mythically elusive as the Michelle Obama "whitey tape."

There were cries from the left that using Obama's middle name was a dog whistle implication that he was a Manchurian candidate. Likewise, it was said that pointing out that Obama was obviously aware of who William Ayers was, and that he had a closer working relationship than just "some guy from my neighborhood" would put Obama's life in danger.

It was Sarah Palin who was hung in effigy, had "artwork" inviting participants to have their picture taken shooting her, and who's own church was burned to the ground by arsonists.

|
8:02 am, Apr 20, 2009
muddog

AndreainNY.

She spoke to a certain group of Americans?. She sure did, if someone from the KKK runs for President and "Speaks' to a certain group, is that supposed to give some credence to their message?.

Just as the world is burning ( that the G.O.P. help set afire ) the G.O.P. finds one of the most inept candidates in recent history, who could very well have been the leader of the free world.

I prefer an intelligent ( even if they are Republican ) candidate than one who speaks to the lowest common denominator as Palin did. She brought out the lunatic fringe ( even if they are a "segment" of society ) in her party that was frankly very scary.

|
|
Reply
|
11:15 am, Apr 16, 2009
SharksBreath

"muddog:She brought out the lunatic fringe ( even if they are a "segment" of society ) in her party that was frankly very scary."

Those loonies are not going away. They are the forefront of the Republican party now. The Christian Conservatives are falling apart. Being a fiscal republican is nothing more than a myth. The elites never liked the redneck part of the party anyway. They just needed there votes. The tea baggers and there costumes along with the mildy retarded gun nuts are all they got left. These are the poorest people in this country yet they support a party for the rich.

It's Insane.


There were at least 4 incidents yesterday when Republicans were called, extremists, terrorists or secessionist and they cheered.

They cheered to being called an extremists, a terrorists or a secessionist.

After 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing.
Crazy.



They destroyed our country and our name.

Now they want a revolution. They tea bagged us for 8 years. It's so fitting that become there new name.,

To bad they missed the revolution. It happened on Nov 4th. The day the world danced in the streets and celebrated there defeat.

If the world celebrated by dancing in the street like the end of WWII for a political party I supported, as a sane person I would try to find out what the heck I was supporting.

So the loonies are not going away.


What characteristics are associated with psychotic disorder?

Some of the characteristics associated with psychotic disorders include delusions, hallucinations, bizarre behavior, incoherent or disorganized speech, and/or disorganized behavior.

Delusions are described as false, inaccurate beliefs the person holds onto even when he/she is presented with accurate information.

The last 8 years proved Conservatism does not work.

Anyone with an ounce of sense could not have lived through the last 8 years and still vote Republican. You would have to be psychotic.



|
|
Reply
|
12:54 pm, Apr 16, 2009
possumdearie

Oh, no. You guys are teabagging yourselves now. You should thank the Americans who showed up to protest the crushing debt being heaped on the shoulders of future generations. It will eventually wreck the middle class and the productive sectors of our economy.

|
11:48 pm, Apr 16, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
12:14 am, Apr 17, 2009
jobert

possumdearie: do you know the connotation of "teabagging"? You guys are getting all kinds of snickers out of the 20-30ish age set. It is a crude slang reference that many Repubs are clearly unaware of.

|
11:58 am, Apr 17, 2009
possumdearie

Oh, no. We get it, but who cares? Better a Teabag than a D-bag.

Obama's trillions dwarf Bush's 'dangerous' spending. I was not a fan of some of the abusive spending under Bush, specifically the first bailout, though I can understand why it was done, at least. For example, $550 billion withdrawn from banks in one hour on Sept. 15 is a national emergency. Paulson's original plan had some merit.

But the Prescription Drug Benefit Act is nothing compared to the hefty down payment put on socialized healthcare during an economic crisis (of which it does nothing to address.)

Here is a check of historical tables compiled by the Office of Management and Budget that shows this spending under Bush. The Bush administration racked up deficits of $158 billion in 2002, $378 billion in 2003, $413 billion in 2004, $318 billion in 2005, $248 billion in 2006, $162 billion in 2007, and $410 billion in 2008.

The current administration would kill to have such small numbers. In the span of four days, we saw the signing of a $787 billion stimulus bill, the rollout of a $275 billion housing proposal, discussion of Congress's remaining appropriations bills (about $400 billion) and word of a vaguely-defined financial stabilization plan that could ultimately cost $2 trillion. When representatives of GM and Chrysler said they might need $21 billion more to survive, it seemed like small beer.

Obama's current spending proposals will cost more than the United States spent on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the general war on terror and Hurricane Katrina in the last seven years. And that's before you throw in the $2 trillion fiscal stabilization plan.

|
12:49 pm, Apr 17, 2009
VenusMuse

Excuse me, but you do honestly think Obuma's 20 TRILLION DOLLAR socialistic programs is good for America?

You're kidding, right?

|
1:09 pm, Apr 17, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
12:09 am, Apr 18, 2009
possumdearie

Geithner in Treasury is like appointing Paulson to another term, more bailouts, more lack of transparency in the bailouts and more corporate welfare. Geithner was the architect of the Bear Stearns bailout and cohort of Treasury Secretary Paulson in AIG and the TARP bailouts. He has never been a banker nor an academic economist. Geither has neither a doctorate in economics nor an MBA. He made his entire career by bailing out failing financial firms.

|
11:17 am, Apr 18, 2009
Ritarita


pos

Geithner has a
Masters in
International
Economics
From
Johns Hopkins
School
Of Advanced
International Studies.

Also in
Chinese
And
Japanese.

|
6:00 pm, Apr 18, 2009
possumdearie

Dumb dumb Rita rita,
Since when is a masters a doctorate?
Did I stutter?

gfy

|
12:54 pm, Apr 19, 2009
judgeinmillvalley

That she was "trailer park" is irrelevant; lots of people in trailer parks are smart and are there because of circumstances. She feigned her idea of "trailer park" and proceeded to talk down to people in that winkin', blinkin' and bod style. That's another thing--her looks. If the men who "liked" her had tried listening instead of watching, they might have heard something different. Before the election, I heard a radio tape of a speech she had given at her church. Shock--was I that deluded by looks, myself? Because that tape confirmed her well crammed for "interviews." She made no sense on the tape, making W look like an erudite professor. And during her interview and debate, she either avoided the question or spoke the way a pull string doll does with answers over and over again. For shame that this is the idea of what a woman could do in office when so many well qualified Republican women were available to run.

|
|
Reply
6:42 pm, Apr 16, 2009
AndreainNY

Nor is there any shortage of lunatics among Palin's and Limbaugh's critics. Were you take a look at the comments about Palin and Limbaugh, you'd see that there's an awfully strong parallel between what they criticize in these figures and their own thinking.

Writing off a group of Americans because you deem their interests, hobbies, and values to be "inferior" is the height of arrogance. Americans don't appreciate being looked down upon. Who can blame them?

I can promise you it is this type of thinking that will cause the Democrats to lose any advantage they now enjoy.

|
|
Reply
|
10:28 pm, Apr 16, 2009
TallulahBankhead

Anyone who believes that people who do not share their skin color is inferior should be engaged but not ever excused for that kind of retrograde thinking. Sarah Palin fomented that base impulse in many Americans during her time as the Republican candidate for VPotus.

The videotapes exist showcasing the misguided people that were attracted to her messages of coded rhetoric (do we know who Barack Obama is? Barack's associations? A woman who was married to someone who was in a secessionist group talking about someone's else associations? WTF?)

Her performance during the election is the primary problem that I will always have with her and the people who crow 'she's just like us.'

The fact that she is running the state of Alaska as if she were Boss Hogg from The Dukes of Hazzard is a reminder that she's incompetent in addition to being a celebrator of ignorance and fear.

Also, I'm a Southerner born and bred. I know how to hear a dog whistle a bit too well.

Would you like to borrow my ears?

|
3:07 am, Apr 17, 2009
quick2no

I agree with TallulahBankhead.

|
8:28 am, Apr 17, 2009
maryyooch

"Americans don't appreciate looked down upon"

Okay, AndreainNY. Don't forget Pailin telling the world that there is a 'good' America and a 'bad America.
Who is (or was) looking down on whom?

|
1:54 pm, Apr 19, 2009
brentTBC

you saw the Bristol-Levi story "incredibly affecting"? right. and i get misty eyed when my dog humps my leg.
www.thebadchemicals.com

|
|
Reply
11:15 am, Apr 16, 2009
cfowler1850

Reihan,

Mrs. Palin has intrigued me since her debut on the National Stage last fall. I myself was a swing voter this election and was eager to understand exactly what the McCain campaigns motivation for putting her on the ticket was.

Unfortunately for the GOP, a party that was supposed to provide candidates with credentials and a broad understanding of both national and international affairs, simply made a terrible calculation. Frankly I was insulted by her nomination, and terrified by her lack of knowledge when it came to geo-political issues. The rhetoric about President Obama was harsh, but that is standard practice at this point (how the GOP made Sen. Kerry, a true War Hero, seem unpatriotic was genius and a sign of things to come.) but her apparent readiness to dismiss the issues and happily campaign on slogans was disturbing.

I don't think that you have seen the last of Sarah Palin though quite frankly. I dont necessarily think that she will ever be a true Presidential candidate but I do believe that if the Republican Party continues down its narrow course that it has set that Mrs. Palin will continue to be a favorite for a VP pick and maybe eventual Senator from Alaska and a major voice in the GOP.


|
|
Reply
|
11:17 am, Apr 16, 2009
SlimSoldier

cfowler,
Second paragraph, referencing the 2004 campaign.....I was nothing more than dumbfounded when it became apparent that tactic was working. I find it HIGHLY hypocritical that so many of the men who beat their chests and talk loud about invading other countries from the confines of air conditioned buildings thousands of miles from harms way, have by all accounts never done so much as a push up under duress.

|
|
Reply
6:05 pm, Apr 17, 2009
adubya

Nothing's changed a bit. The entire party placed all their expectations and hopes into this person that weren't really there. She hasn't changed, but this weird prism that her ardent fans saw her through is melting. She's tabloid fodder, just let her go.

|
|
Reply
11:32 am, Apr 16, 2009
liviapeacock

The two qualities Palin and Obama share are that they both splashed onto the scene at a national convention after making incredible speeches, and that they are in their mid forties.

After that, the wheat separated from the chaff and we saw Obama as accomplished, intelligent, decisive, direct, organized, and no pushover.

Most of us saw Pailn as vindictive, alarmingly incurious, fearlessly petty and ambitious to a fault.

There was no lobotomy; you just fell in love with the attractive package without reading the list of ingredients.

|
|
Reply
|
11:36 am, Apr 16, 2009
Holland

Well said.

|
|
Reply
11:59 am, Apr 16, 2009
juneau

liviapeacock

Absolutely agree with ya totally. Palin needs to get lost in the woods.

|
|
Reply
3:30 pm, Apr 16, 2009
BudSF1

I have been listening to Republicans tell me how brilliant they are for 30 years, and when you instantly recognize a phony like Sarah Palin, they carp about lefty sneering.

I am almost exactly the same age as Sarah Palin and was raised in the same white, middle-class environment. It was not sneering to laugh at her affected mannerisms and showy persona. The only people she fooled was an elite class of pundits who are so out of touch with Americans that they just assumed people would fall in love with her. Oh, she also fooled evangelicals who wear their religion on their sleeves and are just happy to see their worldview validated on the public stage.

Palin is the same woman today who gleefully stuffed the shopping bags on someone else's credit card. Thank God this woman was not elevated to high office, and shame on McCain and the GOP for putting her anywhere near real power.

|
|
Reply
11:36 am, Apr 16, 2009
sonshine

Reihan, I cannot understand how you, a smart person, didn't see what Palin was about when she first hit the national scene. I think that conservatives went into automatic defense mode just because liberals were pointing out her weaknesses and you didn't allow yourselves to see what was right in front of you. What's important now is that you never allow that to happen again. We need a strong opposition party and it's as clear as was SP's amateur from the start, that the GOP is not it. Focus on restarting the nation's conservatives without the same old, no-tax, abortion, abortion, abortion, anti-gay silliness. You've lost those issues. Move on.

|
|
Reply
11:49 am, Apr 16, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
12:03 pm, Apr 16, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
12:04 pm, Apr 16, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Sarah, You Blew It

by Reihan Salam

Info
RSS
Reihan Salam
Emails
|
print
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |