Blogs and Stories

Kim Masters

Is Star Trek Now Cool?

J.J. Adamas directing Star Trek Paramount Pictures Studio insiders tell Kim Masters that the much-hyped Star Trek won't have a huge opening this weekend. But director J.J. Abrams may have done the impossible: sex up the ultimate nerd franchise.

Star Trek might not have a blockbuster opening this weekend, but that doesn’t mean that director J.J. Abrams won’t have a blockbuster in the end.

Industry research shows that Star Trek is not tracking with moviegoers nearly as well as Paramount Pictures might like. As you’d expect, given the name, awareness of the film is high. But research shows that the idea of actually going to see it appeals most strongly to older men—not the young ones who drive big openings. Women, too, are not dying to rush out and see it. “Overall the ‘definite interest’ is well behind where it should be,” says an executive at a rival studio. “The same hurdle that they’ve always had to overcome is still there: The movie’s called Star Trek.”

“Overall the ‘definite interest’ is well behind where it should be,” says an executive at a rival studio. “The same hurdle that they’ve always had to overcome is still there: The movie’s called Star Trek.”

Yes, the series has a dedicated fanbase, but the original Star Trek movies didn’t generate huge box office. Studio box-office trackers expect this $150 million-plus, effects-driven reinvention to pull in around $60 million this weekend, which would fall far short of, say, the $100 million opening weekend for Iron Man a year ago.

But the film—only the second that Abrams has directed (following Mission: Impossible 3)—has a stunning 94 percent positive rating on the Rotten Tomatoes Web site. Word-of-mouth should be strong and this movie is likely to have what the industry calls “legs.”

At 42 years old, Abrams has already lived long and prospered in a very tough industry. He has written films from the 1990 James Belushi comedy Taking Care of Business to the 1998 Jerry Bruckheimer hit Armageddon. He is a creator of television shows including Felicity, Alias, and Lost. And Abrams has become a brand. The new Star Trek stars a group of unknowns but the studio is selling Abrams, who’s been circling the globe to support it.

“They’re trying to make him into Jim Cameron,” says one prominent producer, prompting a Fox executive to muse: “He’s almost more of a consumer product than Cameron.”

Paramount Chief Executive Brad Grey wouldn’t blush if Abrams is compared with anyone. “I think he really is going to be one of the greats of our industry,” he says. “He’s become an extraordinary director very quickly.”

Abrams seems to have gotten to this level without making lots of enemies, which may be an even bigger achievement than sustained success in Hollywood. He did this by being “a stand-up guy,” as one top agent who doesn’t even represent him puts it.

Abrams was a Hollywood kid—his father produced television movies. His first writing partner, while he was still a senior at Sarah Lawrence, was Jill Mazursky (whose father Paul directed Down and Out in Beverly Hills, among other movies). “He definitely worked harder than anybody I’ve been exposed to in my life,” Mazursky says. “He would work until four in the morning while our friends were out partying.”

Abrams insisted that Mazursky take Robert McKee’s screenwriting class even though she’d already sold some scripts. Even at that tender age, she adds, “He really knew how to put material together.” When he was just 21, Abrams’ script for Regarding Henry was red-hot, attracting producer Scott Rudin and director Mike Nichols, with Harrison Ford in the starring role. (The film was a disappointment.)

Back to Top
May 7, 2009 | 5:48am
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

robjh1

With all the marketing...of course it's cool.

|
|
Reply
7:58 am, May 7, 2009

flyoverland

I may be the only person on earth who has never seen an episode of Star Trek.

|
|
Reply
|
8:08 am, May 7, 2009

scobyx

nope *raises hand* here's another. I will however see the movie eventually, just not opening weekend.

|
|
Reply
10:58 am, May 7, 2009

easton

Wow, how exciting for the world to know that. I can't wait to tell everyone I know this information

|
|
Reply
|
7:00 pm, May 7, 2009

magicspin

Oh, m'sieur/dame easton, reduced to sarcasm over 2 downy-soft Trek virgins?! Come now... Surely this is the point Mr Abrams is getting at - that there's a whole mob in their company... those that only know the show by reputation or p'aps from merely seeing a weary, later film installment. Imagine - a whole new generation for the first time discovering the Joy of Spock (He has so many positions..!).

|
10:02 am, May 8, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
8:30 am, May 7, 2009

mchasewalker

Duh, pretty boy newbie tv stars in a over-hyped, over-wrought, puberty-driven, Ritalin rush of a hashed and rehashed 60' s
television series?

What's not to like?

|
|
Reply
11:34 am, May 7, 2009

citivas

I guess I'll play contrarian here and say I'm looking forward to seeing it this weekend, I was a minor Trek fan and have seen all the other movies (though the last few only on video), as well as most of the original TV show in repeats as a kid. So I am the key demo I guess. I am minorly interested to see the reinterpretation of the characters and see a more actiony Trek with a bigger budget and the trailers made it look like a promising action film. If you're not a fan of sci-fi or action films, then obviously its not for you...

Surprisingly, my wife and kids want to see it too. My wife was never a Trek fan and my kids had never heard of it or seen any episode or movie. They all just thought the trailers looked cool action-wise.

|
|
Reply
3:08 pm, May 7, 2009

Abelard

My wife's not a big fan, so I guess I'll wait for DVD. :)

|
|
Reply
6:58 pm, May 7, 2009

Dreamer4Ever

Geek Movies have gotten GREAT. Iron Man, The Dark Night, 300, Spider Man II, even The Hulk were genuinely GOOD movies. This is especially surprising for people who grew up with comic book movies that were shallow, irritating cash-ins. So what happened?

What happened was that one comic-book reading nerd grew up to be Sam Raimi and made "Spider Man" in a way that showed everyone why he loved the character in the first place.

Star Trek is undergoing the same kind of rebirth. Never underestimate the power of geek love, or the geek dollar.

|
|
Reply
7:29 pm, May 7, 2009

magicspin

Yeah, funny how us Geeks & Obsessive Compulsives (sorry, unnecessary distinction!) are being portrayed more forgivingly on the big screen these days.

Of course JJ got the job - he's the natural fit. Distill the essence of his past work, of both TV series & film (Felicity, Alias, Lost, M:I 3 just being a start), and "boldly going" does seem to come to mind (tho' exploring hormonal universes might sum up those early years...!). Your average Star Trek episode sent the Enterprise on forays into space & mind, always turning up something confronting, scary, funny, frustrating, & in the end, enlightening. And all with that magically "swooshing" door & Scottie's "up-beeming".

Maybe the island mightn't have the "swooshing", but there's plenty of off-the-planet stuff going on there... (What would we do without assorted weird monsters, wildlife, with the occasional polar bear thrown in?). Star Trek, without drawing too long a bow, is just Lost in Space...

|
|
Reply
8:34 pm, May 7, 2009

doko84

okay, i don't know what the hell you guys are all talking about, but I just saw the movie, and it was FUCKING AMAZING, so I suggest you all pull your heads out of your asses and go see it.

|
|
Reply
|
12:36 am, May 8, 2009

ninjawookie

Yeah, this is my movie of the year if Inglorious Bastards doesn't top it. I agree it won't do as well initially, but it's such a strong film in general that it will get word of mouth.

of the eleven star trek movies made so far, this is indeed my favourite, and the most fully realised vision of gene roddenberry characters.

|
|
Reply
3:23 am, May 8, 2009

sophia5

As a Non-Trekky, thought I'd catch the early show
to avoid the geeky crowd, but they were there in
force.

Actually the movie was okay, except for the
annoying Jerry Lewis-Like laughter at the
inside Romulan / Vulcan humor,
which went completely over my head.

I should have brought a NERD translation guide.

HEY LADYyyyyyyyyyyyy !!!

|
|
Reply
6:07 pm, May 8, 2009

ginsushark

Best Star Trek Movie since Wrath of Khan

Best Star Wars movie since Empire Strikes Back

its a mix of both styles

|
|
Reply
8:53 pm, May 8, 2009

AZDave

Applause--Applause. The theater was filled with Hoots and Applause throughout the movie today. There was extended applause at the end of the movie while the credits cycled. People just sat there and didn't rush out of the movie. I just hope this is the launch of a beautiful new 'treckie' franchise. This movie was stunning...I have not seen such a reaction in a theater ever. Wow!

|
|
Reply
9:54 pm, May 8, 2009

citivas

$72.5. Much better than $60. I suspect this story was just the studios way of setting expectations low and covering their butts... I'm sure the sequel will be greenlit tomorrow morning...

|
|
Reply
11:10 pm, May 10, 2009

fx772k1

Studio box-office trackers expect this $150 million-plus, effects-driven reinvention to pull in around $60 million this weekend
--
Good call, box-office trackers. :P

|
|
Reply
3:51 am, May 11, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Is Star Trek Now Cool?

by Kim Masters

Info
RSS
Kim Masters
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |