Blogs and Stories
Is Star Trek Now Cool?
Paramount Pictures
Studio insiders tell Kim Masters that the much-hyped Star Trek won't have a huge opening this weekend. But director J.J. Abrams may have done the impossible: sex up the ultimate nerd franchise.
Star Trek might not have a blockbuster opening this weekend, but that doesn’t mean that director J.J. Abrams won’t have a blockbuster in the end.
Industry research shows that Star Trek is not tracking with moviegoers nearly as well as Paramount Pictures might like. As you’d expect, given the name, awareness of the film is high. But research shows that the idea of actually going to see it appeals most strongly to older men—not the young ones who drive big openings. Women, too, are not dying to rush out and see it. “Overall the ‘definite interest’ is well behind where it should be,” says an executive at a rival studio. “The same hurdle that they’ve always had to overcome is still there: The movie’s called Star Trek.”
“Overall the ‘definite interest’ is well behind where it should be,” says an executive at a rival studio. “The same hurdle that they’ve always had to overcome is still there: The movie’s called Star Trek.”
Yes, the series has a dedicated fanbase, but the original Star Trek movies didn’t generate huge box office. Studio box-office trackers expect this $150 million-plus, effects-driven reinvention to pull in around $60 million this weekend, which would fall far short of, say, the $100 million opening weekend for Iron Man a year ago.
But the film—only the second that Abrams has directed (following Mission: Impossible 3)—has a stunning 94 percent positive rating on the Rotten Tomatoes Web site. Word-of-mouth should be strong and this movie is likely to have what the industry calls “legs.”
At 42 years old, Abrams has already lived long and prospered in a very tough industry. He has written films from the 1990 James Belushi comedy Taking Care of Business to the 1998 Jerry Bruckheimer hit Armageddon. He is a creator of television shows including Felicity, Alias, and Lost. And Abrams has become a brand. The new Star Trek stars a group of unknowns but the studio is selling Abrams, who’s been circling the globe to support it.
“They’re trying to make him into Jim Cameron,” says one prominent producer, prompting a Fox executive to muse: “He’s almost more of a consumer product than Cameron.”
Paramount Chief Executive Brad Grey wouldn’t blush if Abrams is compared with anyone. “I think he really is going to be one of the greats of our industry,” he says. “He’s become an extraordinary director very quickly.”
Abrams seems to have gotten to this level without making lots of enemies, which may be an even bigger achievement than sustained success in Hollywood. He did this by being “a stand-up guy,” as one top agent who doesn’t even represent him puts it.
Abrams was a Hollywood kid—his father produced television movies. His first writing partner, while he was still a senior at Sarah Lawrence, was Jill Mazursky (whose father Paul directed Down and Out in Beverly Hills, among other movies). “He definitely worked harder than anybody I’ve been exposed to in my life,” Mazursky says. “He would work until four in the morning while our friends were out partying.”
Abrams insisted that Mazursky take Robert McKee’s screenwriting class even though she’d already sold some scripts. Even at that tender age, she adds, “He really knew how to put material together.” When he was just 21, Abrams’ script for Regarding Henry was red-hot, attracting producer Scott Rudin and director Mike Nichols, with Harrison Ford in the starring role. (The film was a disappointment.)







robjh1
With all the marketing...of course it's cool.
flyoverland
I may be the only person on earth who has never seen an episode of Star Trek.
scobyx
nope *raises hand* here's another. I will however see the movie eventually, just not opening weekend.
easton
Wow, how exciting for the world to know that. I can't wait to tell everyone I know this information
magicspin
Oh, m'sieur/dame easton, reduced to sarcasm over 2 downy-soft Trek virgins?! Come now... Surely this is the point Mr Abrams is getting at - that there's a whole mob in their company... those that only know the show by reputation or p'aps from merely seeing a weary, later film installment. Imagine - a whole new generation for the first time discovering the Joy of Spock (He has so many positions..!).
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
mchasewalker
Duh, pretty boy newbie tv stars in a over-hyped, over-wrought, puberty-driven, Ritalin rush of a hashed and rehashed 60' s
television series?
What's not to like?
citivas
I guess I'll play contrarian here and say I'm looking forward to seeing it this weekend, I was a minor Trek fan and have seen all the other movies (though the last few only on video), as well as most of the original TV show in repeats as a kid. So I am the key demo I guess. I am minorly interested to see the reinterpretation of the characters and see a more actiony Trek with a bigger budget and the trailers made it look like a promising action film. If you're not a fan of sci-fi or action films, then obviously its not for you...
Surprisingly, my wife and kids want to see it too. My wife was never a Trek fan and my kids had never heard of it or seen any episode or movie. They all just thought the trailers looked cool action-wise.
Abelard
My wife's not a big fan, so I guess I'll wait for DVD. :)
Dreamer4Ever
Geek Movies have gotten GREAT. Iron Man, The Dark Night, 300, Spider Man II, even The Hulk were genuinely GOOD movies. This is especially surprising for people who grew up with comic book movies that were shallow, irritating cash-ins. So what happened?
What happened was that one comic-book reading nerd grew up to be Sam Raimi and made "Spider Man" in a way that showed everyone why he loved the character in the first place.
Star Trek is undergoing the same kind of rebirth. Never underestimate the power of geek love, or the geek dollar.
magicspin
Yeah, funny how us Geeks & Obsessive Compulsives (sorry, unnecessary distinction!) are being portrayed more forgivingly on the big screen these days.
Of course JJ got the job - he's the natural fit. Distill the essence of his past work, of both TV series & film (Felicity, Alias, Lost, M:I 3 just being a start), and "boldly going" does seem to come to mind (tho' exploring hormonal universes might sum up those early years...!). Your average Star Trek episode sent the Enterprise on forays into space & mind, always turning up something confronting, scary, funny, frustrating, & in the end, enlightening. And all with that magically "swooshing" door & Scottie's "up-beeming".
Maybe the island mightn't have the "swooshing", but there's plenty of off-the-planet stuff going on there... (What would we do without assorted weird monsters, wildlife, with the occasional polar bear thrown in?). Star Trek, without drawing too long a bow, is just Lost in Space...
doko84
okay, i don't know what the hell you guys are all talking about, but I just saw the movie, and it was FUCKING AMAZING, so I suggest you all pull your heads out of your asses and go see it.
ninjawookie
Yeah, this is my movie of the year if Inglorious Bastards doesn't top it. I agree it won't do as well initially, but it's such a strong film in general that it will get word of mouth.
of the eleven star trek movies made so far, this is indeed my favourite, and the most fully realised vision of gene roddenberry characters.
sophia5
As a Non-Trekky, thought I'd catch the early show
to avoid the geeky crowd, but they were there in
force.
Actually the movie was okay, except for the
annoying Jerry Lewis-Like laughter at the
inside Romulan / Vulcan humor,
which went completely over my head.
I should have brought a NERD translation guide.
HEY LADYyyyyyyyyyyyy !!!
ginsushark
Best Star Trek Movie since Wrath of Khan
Best Star Wars movie since Empire Strikes Back
its a mix of both styles
AZDave
Applause--Applause. The theater was filled with Hoots and Applause throughout the movie today. There was extended applause at the end of the movie while the credits cycled. People just sat there and didn't rush out of the movie. I just hope this is the launch of a beautiful new 'treckie' franchise. This movie was stunning...I have not seen such a reaction in a theater ever. Wow!
citivas
$72.5. Much better than $60. I suspect this story was just the studios way of setting expectations low and covering their butts... I'm sure the sequel will be greenlit tomorrow morning...
fx772k1
Studio box-office trackers expect this $150 million-plus, effects-driven reinvention to pull in around $60 million this weekend
--
Good call, box-office trackers. :P
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.