Blogs and Stories

Larry Kramer

The Media Can Profit from Twitter's Big Week

woman taking cell phone picture Ben Curtis / AP Photo The micro-blogging service is leading the Iran election coverage and is even breaking big sports news. But its newfound dominance doesn’t have to be bad news for traditional news organizations, says Larry Kramer.

Plus, read more insight on Iran's election from other Daily Beast writers.

As if the year hasn’t been tough enough for the media, the press’ role in disseminating news took some harsh blows this week.

Consider this lead on a wire story on CBSSports.com on Wednesday:

“MINNEAPOLIS—Minnesota Timberwolves forward Kevin Love says on Twitter that Kevin McHale will not return as coach next season.

“In an update posted early Wednesday, Love tweeted, ‘Today is a sad day…Kevin McHale will NOT be back as head coach this season.’”

Media will no longer be the filter through which all news must pass. That genie is out of the bottle.

These words were not followed by any official confirmation, but by this:

“Upon seeing the posting, a person in the league was told McHale sent a text message to Love indicating he was not coming back. The person requested anonymity because no official announcement has been made.”

So one Tweeter goes on the record to say the coach has been fired, and a worldwide news organization, even after the information is public, is reduced to a secondhand rumor from an unnamed source.

“P.S. I am not a breaking news guys...” Love further tweeted, according to the wire report…which I assume is at least reporting the tweets accurately. “I had no idea no one knew…I’ll tell them I stayed at a holiday inn express last night. Always works...”

This is just the latest incident to highlight the growing role the general public is taking in news dissemination. Raw, unfiltered, and without any known standards to follow, news on Twitter from nonprofessional journalists can be inaccurate and even dangerous. But even knowing that, the public is quickly gravitating toward interactive social networks and devices like Twitter.

Go back just one day and look at what is happening in Iran. Twitter became the delivery method of choice for news out of Iran. The only action the Obama administration took to try to ensure the free flow of information out of Iran over the last couple of days was to ask the Web programmers who work on Twitter to delay a planned upgrade that would have shut down the system during daylight in Iran.

The White House made no pleas to give our news agencies access or protection to do their job. The State Department knew where people were getting their information—and knew that Twitter was difficult for any government to control.

What does this mean for traditional news organizations?

For one thing, they can’t afford to be lazy or continue to ignore their readers. Form matters as much as substance now. News consumers want news on demand and in formats that work for them. They know a tweet is real-time and they like its precision and efficiency. And they like the feeling they are being put right on the scene. They can feel the emotion.

Back to Top
June 17, 2009 | 7:56pm
Comments ()
Uberjeff

Tell us something we don't know

|
|
Reply
9:05 pm, Jun 17, 2009
ahoving

there's a big opportunity for collaboration between media pros and the public. see "The Frequency" at http://www.thefrequency.tv (rough comp for proposed site)

|
|
Reply
10:26 am, Jun 18, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

The Media Can Profit from Twitter's Big Week

by Larry Kramer

Info
RSS
Larry Kramer
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |