Blogs and Stories
Murdoch's Crazy Gang
L to R: Brad Barket / Getty Images, Fiona Hanson / AP Photo
His tabs are accused of wiretapping major celebs and the editor who presided over two of his papers has just been promoted to run his entire British newspaper group. But Andrew Neil says no one seems to care.
When Rupert Murdoch, squirreled away with the rest of the U.S. media elite at their annual gathering in Sun Valley, Idaho, was contacted by Bloomberg about the astonishing claims being made back in London about the bizarre behavior of his two British tabloids, the Sun and the News of the World, he replied that he knew nothing about it.
Since the story involved the tabloids paying a $1.6 million out-of-court settlement to keep embarrassing information secret—“That couldn’t happen without me knowing,” averred Mr. Murdoch—only two conclusions were possible: Either he was being economical with the truth or the old man had finally lost control of his wayward tabloid offspring. When tackled about it on his own Fox News, he had stopped the denials—he just refused to talk about it (the interviewer, not surprisingly, didn’t push him).
The famous names who think they’ve had their privacy violated are being encouraged to bring what in America would be called a class-action suit against the Murdoch papers.
“Maybe the lunatics really have taken over the asylum,” one former Murdoch tabloid editor mused to me. Perhaps so. Certainly lunatic things have been happening, especially in the newsroom of the News of the World, a raunchy Sunday tabloid which sells more copies—more than 3 million every week—than any other newspaper in Britain.
Last week the Guardian, the country’s leading liberal-left newspaper and therefore an old enemy of the Murdoch press, claimed that the News of the Screws (as it is known in Fleet Street because of its penchant for revealing sexual misdemeanors) had been systematically using private investigators to invade the privacy of celebrities and other famous folks to gather dirt on them.
Everybody knew something along these lines had been happening because two years ago the paper’s royal correspondent had been jailed for hacking into the mobile-phone voicemails of the royal family, along with the PI who’d done the hacking for him. At the time, however, Murdoch’s London executives and editors dismissed this as the unauthorized work of a rogue journalist and a rogue PI. They even testified to that effect in front of a parliamentary investigation.
In direct contradiction of that testimony, the Guardian claims that, far from that being an exception, the News of the World has resorted to the use of potentially criminal invasions of privacy on an industrial scale to gather stories. Up to 3,000 celebrities and other famous folk had been targeted, from the former deputy prime minister (John Prescott) to Elle Macpherson to Gwyneth Paltrow to London Mayor Boris Johnson to Posh Spice and David Beckham.
The modus operandi was to attempt to access messages on their voicemail, which is easier than you might think since most people apparently don’t change the factory default setting of 1234 or 0000. So we’re not talking James Bond here; but it is, nevertheless, illegal. A separate report by Britain’s official information commissioner had revealed that some of the country’s newspapers—the News of the World is not in this alone—had used PIs to access, illegally, ex-director's phone numbers, addresses, driver’s license details and even health records. In other words, British newspapers were awash in an epidemic of illegality—with the News of the World in particular out of control.
At the heart of the Guardian’s claims are two pillars of Murdoch’s British Establishment: Rebekah Wade, flame-haired editor of the News of the World and then the Sun, when illegality was supposedly rampant in both newsrooms; and Andy Coulson, her deputy at the News of the World and the man who succeeded her when she left to take over the Sun.







Johnnorth
Great account. Shocks enough in the original Guardian scoop, but to read Neil's report on how the rest of the British press reacted is grim. Bear in mind Murdoch owns much of the British press - forget the total circulation he (and now she) controls but it's a lot.
Twisted
This article details just the tip of the iceberg of the danger of Rupert Murdoch's media conglomerate. European countries are far more interested in defamation than the united states so they have afar more developed and restrictive legal framework for publishers; on the other hand we in the united states have greater interests in personal privacy therefore we have a complex multi tiered legal framework related to eavedroping and wiretapping; felonies under both federal and state law with also penalties in civil court for victims. however Mr Murdochs now has been given leave of our government to operate out of compliance relating to trust and monopoly law and since that event they have added ownership of other more important media outlets such as dow jones/ wall street journal. They have staffed these media outlets with nutball right wingers and totally slant the news . Time to enforce our laws and force them to divest both news papers and television outlets.
bryanwilliamchristopher
Isn't it incredible that no one ever knows anything when something goes wrong? For me, the question is not whether Andy Coulson was involved or not in the phone-tapping scandal, but that as editor of a newspaper he SHOULD have known what his journalists were up to. Likewise, where were the financial controls that allowed money to be paid to a long list of investigators? Are we also to assume that all the journalists involved were acting alone and just happened to share private eyes?
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.