Blogs and Stories

John Ortved

Secrets of The Simpsons

BS Top - Ortved Simpsons Creators of the animated series and Fox lawyers did everything they could to stop John Ortved's unauthorized history. The inside story of why he wrote it anyway.

The letter referred to me as “Mr. Ortved”—my first sign that I was in deep, deep trouble.

No one calls me Mr. Ortved. I’ve been “Johnny O,” “Ortved” (at prep school) and even “John John.” The only time I’ve ever been “Mr. Ortved” is when addressed by the employees of telecommunications companies and lawyers. The letter was, unfortunately, from the latter, specifically the legal representatives of the Fox Corporation, which owns The Simpsons.

I should not have been surprised. I was writing a history of The Simpsons without their consent—as I had done the previous year in an article for Vanity Fair—for my book, The Simpsons: An Uncensored, Unauthorized History published this week by Faber and Faber. Hence the letter from Fox’s lawyers, none of whom I have ever met, but who I assume hold some very deep pockets and the temperate nature of a Nicaraguan death squad. (The letter itself contained very few specifics, but offered the vague threat of “carefully reviewing” my book for accuracy.)

One witness to the early days was particularly annoyed that Groening took so much credit for the show’s success, when “the fat fuck just sat up in his office all day, figuring out ways to make more money [with merchandising]” while Sam Simon and the writers churned out brilliant script after brilliant script.

The problem, or delight, in writing an unauthorized history is that someone’s feathers are bound to get ruffled (by the lawyer’s reaction to my book about The Simpsons—an entity that has earned upwards of $3 billion for its parent companies—it seemed that I had engaged less in an act of ruffling than total depluming). In the case of my Simpsons history, the squawking started early, only a few months into the project.

Back in 2006, as a 26-year old associate at Vanity Fair, I was delighted to be assigned my first feature—the oral history of The Simpsons, something I’d pitched knowing that it would be short, fun, pegged to the release of a major film; a cakewalk for a green reporter. Dead. Fucking. Wrong.

The Simpsons: An Uncensored, Unauthorized History The Simpsons: An Uncensored, Unauthorized History By John Ortved 352 pages. Faber & Faber. $27. Fox wavered, and took their time getting back to me. Months, in fact. So I started interviewing. I spoke to former writers and producers like Conan O’Brien, Josh Weinstein and Jay Kogen; and a current one, Tim Long. People were fairly candid—I didn’t have their cooperation yet, but The Simpsons in Vanity Fair—it seemed like a no-brainer. Finally, the word came back from Fox’s flaks: no go. There would be no cooperation. Why? James L. Brooks, whose company, Gracie Films, produces the show along with Fox, had heard I’d been asking questions about Sam Simon, the show’s exiled executive producer, and the kibosh was on.

Now Sam Simon, along with Matt Groening and James L. Brooks, is one of the show’s original executive producers. He left the series in the fourth season among much acrimony, kept a big piece of the show, and now spends his untold millions rehabilitating abandoned dogs and donating them to the handicapped. All of this is well known. Why was Brooks going ballistic?

Well, The Simpsons is a brand, a very valuable one at that, and like Coca-Cola, Mickey Mouse, Tom Cruise, or Virgin Airlines, this brand’s profitability is directly related to its perceived image, an image my book would be challenging (most egregiously, by removing of some of the credit attributed to the series’ creator, Matt Groening, and giving it to Sam Simon and the writing team he assembled).

Back to Top
October 13, 2009 | 8:18pm
Comments ()
Veronicaxy

There are Matt Groenings in everyone's life. Unlikely winners. But you can't take the winning away from them.

I was volunteering at an organization Matt Groening's father Homer supported. It was the first year of the Simpsons and it looked like it was going to be a hit. I congratulated Homer and he said "Thank God, I thought Matt would never be able to make a living." And he went on to tell me about how worried he had been about the son he loved who could not get it together through his 20s and early 30s, etc. Homer was a successful ad exec who made sure his family had the best. His the fatherly fear was still as visceral as was Matt's success was fresh. It was sweet and thankfully happily resolved.

From that one conversation though it was clear even his dad didn't think a lot of Matt in many ways.

So you know what, Matt drew simple dark cartoons that became the genesis for a lot of very smart and talented people to mold into something we all love. He is the one that got it together to create the first shows and get people like James Brooks to support his work.

And he was smart enough to not be shuffled off with a pitiful check and see his name obscured while many others continue to make great sitcoms and lots of money. And we know that has happened more often than not.

So Fox wants to make the story simple, and the real engine behind the show is behind the curtain. Folks, you're rich, well employed and the Simpsons wouldn't exist with out Matt.

It's all good.

|
|
Reply
|
2:02 am, Oct 14, 2009
mancalah

Veronicaxy - The group's point is that the road goes both ways.

Ortved - Good work. This kind of journalism is important.

|
|
Reply
10:28 am, Oct 14, 2009
roadhunter

"It turns out Matt Groening was not considered a great asset by many in The Simpsons writers room"
Tough shit. He created The Simpsons. Most creators of content or products are not brilliant marketers, but they get rich because they came up with the idea in the first place.

|
|
Reply
|
9:54 am, Oct 14, 2009
kdj-kdj

A dick by any other name still smells like a dick.

|
|
Reply
10:46 am, Oct 14, 2009
johnnyapplecd

I don't think this article/book is about who deserves what-- I think it's about an interesting story that Fox tried to quash to protect the public image of Groening as the man behind the Simpsons (a show which I love unabashedly, by the way). Sure, Groening deserves every dollar, just as Veronicaxy says above you... it's smart to protect your assets and not let your ideas be hijacked. However, the story behind "the story" has it's merits, too, and Groening is not the whole story by a longshot.

|
|
Reply
11:16 am, Oct 14, 2009
luigia

"At one point in my research for the book, I was pouring over court papers, trying to decipher what really happened when Tracey Ullman took Fox to court back in 1991."

Editor, what did Mr Ortved pour over those court papers?

|
|
Reply
|
11:18 am, Oct 14, 2009
themightysven

Luigia, he poured his vision over the court papers.
It's a fairly common phrase.

|
|
Reply
|
8:26 am, Oct 15, 2009
Willoughby

MightySven- No, "pored over" is a fairly common phrase. "Poured over" is, in this case, an editing error.

|
9:56 am, Oct 15, 2009
Jessica150

Great article--entertaining and well written. Cheers!

|
|
Reply
1:11 pm, Oct 14, 2009
vin301

Wow

|
|
Reply
10:49 am, Oct 15, 2009
bmonet

matt used to publish cartoon books ( i have one 1990) with rabbits and guys in fez hats called ,'the book of hell',there's also love is hell, school is hell, life is hell, etc. so he has a 'thing' for rabbits. cartoonists are born not made. its a natural talent.

|
|
Reply
4:51 pm, Oct 15, 2009
Dan100

Lame way to promote your book, is this an article or an advertisment?

|
|
Reply
11:12 pm, Oct 15, 2009
cassandravert

It does seem strangely ironic that while The Simpsons scripts promote a healthy level of subversiveness, the show's owners not only do not appreciate but try to smother real subversiveness.

|
|
Reply
5:57 pm, Oct 17, 2009
Leave a Comment
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments
Leave a comment

Please log in to leave comments.

Secrets of The Simpsons

by John Ortved

Info
RSS
John Ortved
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |