Blogs and Stories

Lloyd Grove

Letterman Suspect's Novel Defense

Robert Halderman Getty Images Robert Joel Halderman wasn’t trying to blackmail David Letterman over his workplace peccadilloes—he was trying to sell a story, the suspect’s lawyer says. Lloyd Grove reports from the media scrum.

So why was this man smiling?

Former CBS News producer Robert Joel Halderman is in a world of hurt—and mostly he looked it during his appearance Tuesday in New York State Supreme Court. David Letterman’s smooth-faced alleged blackmailer—shorn of that devil-may-care goatee from last month’s arraignment and now wearing a sober gray suit and a green patterned tie—bore the appropriately stricken expression of a man in difficulty.

Not only has the 51-year-old Halderman lost his job at 48 Hours, where he was an Emmy-winning producer earning more than $200,000 a year, but he also faces hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal bills and possibly 15 years of prison time on a felony indictment of attempted first-degree grand larceny.

“Stated in simplest terms, we argue that Mr. Halderman did not violate the law. He never had any intentions to violate the law. He was involved in a commercial transaction.”

Yet the accused—standing mutely beside his defense attorney, Gerald Shargel, before a thicket of cameras—couldn’t suppress a tiny grin when Shargel cracked to a nosy reporter in the media mob outside the courthouse: “His fees are my business. That’s why it’s good to be me!”

Amid general laughter, a blond woman brandishing a microphone cooed: “That was a great bite! Thank you!”

Someone else asked: “Jerry, how has your client been holding up?”

Shargel gave Halderman a stagily appraising glance. “He looks good,” the lawyer announced. “He’s lost weight and he’s in fighting shape.”

The New York media just love them some Shargel, and the affection is lavishly reciprocated. A litigator best known for defending colorful mobsters and other homicidal maniacs, notably the late “Dandy Don” John Gotti, Shargel got off some other camera-ready lines, minutes after he and Assistant District Attorney Judy Salwen discussed his various motions, accompanied by a 34-page legal memorandum, to dismiss Halderman’s indictment, quash a couple of search warrants, and declare New York’s extortion statute “unconstitutionally vague.” State Supreme Court Justice Charles H. Solomon gave Salwen until Dec. 15 to respond.

The defendant’s legal troubles stem from his alleged threat to expose the married Letterman’s workplace peccadilloes in a book or a screenplay unless the CBS late-night star paid him $2 million. In September Halderman allegedly held three negotiating sessions with Letterman’s entertainment lawyer, Jim Jackoway, who wore a wire to the last two, supplied by the cops. Halderman was arrested Oct. 1 after depositing Letterman’s bogus $2 million check, and Letterman went on the air that night to give his version of events.

The producer’s troubles apparently started with a sensational love triangle involving him, Letterman, and the talk-show host’s 34-year-old former personal assistant (and frequent on-air comic foil), Stephanie Birkitt. According to Shargel’s memo, which gives more juicy details than previously provided, Birkitt and Halderman began dating after his 2004 divorce from his second wife, and the following year Birkitt moved into his house in Norwalk, Connecticut.

“In late 2008, however,” the memo states, “Halderman discovered that Birkitt had been unfaithful and was carrying on a sexual relationship with Letterman. He also discovered evidence that Letterman had created and fostered an environment of workplace sexual misconduct that, under any definition, amounted to actionable sexual harassment.” (Not that Halderman was an angel in this regard; during his 27 years at CBS, he developed a reputation among his colleagues for conducting numerous extramarital flings, some with co-workers, as well as occasionally participating in barroom brawls.)

Back to Top
November 10, 2009 | 9:08pm
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

crypto

This whole thing is a disgrace. But Letterman should have been gone long ago. You can't call him a has been, more like a never was. When Carson was around Letterman was just somebody to fill a slot. then Carson left and Leno came in. Letterman was still the goat. Leno moved on and now Letterman plays second fiddle to O'brian. If they had moved him out long ago nobody would be facing this now. Whatta mess.

|
|
Reply
|
9:38 pm, Nov 10, 2009

NHBill

You can't be serious. No one stays on TV for nearly 30 years if they are a "never was". You may not be a fan but you can't seriously argue that Letterman is some sort of failure.

|
|
Reply
|
10:58 am, Nov 11, 2009

osea65

Crypto is a never will be crypt keeper, that's all!!!! What a moron!!!

|
1:46 pm, Nov 11, 2009

crypto

I guess I just didn't say it properly. I didn't call the man a failure. The people I compared him to, in his time slot, were far above his capabilities. He could have never been a Johnny Carson, or Leno, or even an O'brian. Therefore the never was. His CEO said this week that his ratings have been the best they have ever been since he exposed his sexual trist on national T V. I don't know what that means.

|
9:56 pm, Nov 11, 2009

Storeboughtjam

What Halderman did was sleazy (even if it wasn't legally extortion, it was still morally wrong and threatening), but what Letterman did was just as bad (even if it wasn't legally sexual harassment). There's about even. Just because no one complained about being harassment, or an environment of sexual favoritism, doesn't mean it didn't happen. Plenty of women (and men) are tacitly, or not so tacitly, into keeping their mouths shut. Letterman's lawyer is right: he's not on trial -- but maybe he should be. Read Nell Scovell's description of working in Letterman's lair, and you'll see what I mean.

|
|
Reply
|
4:51 am, Nov 11, 2009

Storeboughtjam

I think I was half asleep when I made the above comment. I meant to write, "'they're about even," not "there's about even," and add "it" to "about [it] being harassment" and add "bullied" to "bullied into keeping their mouths shut." That's what happens when you write a comment at around 5AM.

|
|
Reply
10:18 am, Nov 11, 2009

crypto

LOL I musta been asleep also. Made perfect sense to me.

|
|
Reply
10:39 am, Nov 11, 2009

NHBill

Remember they have Halderman talking to Letterman's lawyer while he was wearing a mic. I am sure the attorney understood the difference between a business transaction and blackmail. I find it implausible that Halderman did not incriminate himself on tape in the multiple meetings before his arrest.

|
|
Reply
11:02 am, Nov 11, 2009

aspiemom

The fact that the Letterman contacted the police and his attorney wore a wire shows that he did not feel like this was a business proposition. Extortion is the act of obtaining money or property through coercion or other force. If Letterman didn't feel coerced or otherwise threatened, why would he have contacted the police in the first place?

|
|
Reply
12:28 pm, Nov 11, 2009

Granite

Halderman is a moron. A more successful blackmail attempt would be to just let Dave know he had some evidence that he was going to expose and let Letterman offer him a bribe.

Halderman has written a mental screenplay in which he is innocent.

|
|
Reply
2:17 pm, Nov 11, 2009

crypto

For osea65, your earlier post: I should hope not. This is not the first time you have attacked me for an opinion. I don't mind any disagreement but personal attacks??? You shouldn't do that. In the first place I can tell from your post that you're not intelligent enough to express a good argument. Further it's evident that you are an emotional cripple who attempts to stand taller somehow by cutting other people. I'll just bet that you are the neighborhood bully who yells at the kids who happen by. At any rate I expect a reply to this so to show that I am patient and an understanding type of person I promise to allow your wrath without further comment.

|
|
Reply
10:08 pm, Nov 11, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Letterman Suspect's Novel Defense

by Lloyd Grove

Info
RSS
Lloyd Grove
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |