Blogs and Stories
Reliving Mumbai's 9/11
Arko Datta / Reuters
A chilling HBO documentary revisits the three days of trauma Mumbai endured last year—the bloodshed that left 170 dead, the quiet voices of the seemingly unstoppable terrorists. Tunku Varadarajan looks back on the attacks.
As two heavily armed terrorists barged through the front doors of the five-star Oberoi Trident hotel in the Indian city of Mumbai, their cell phone rang. “Are you there?” a voice asked. On learning that the men were, indeed, at the appointed place, the same voice said, in a tone so soothing it could have been that of a doctor coddling a terminal patient: “You’re very close to heaven, brother.”
A year ago, 10 young jihadist men—brainwashed to the core of what passed for their souls—set out from training camps in neighboring Pakistan in search of a murderous place in heaven, the path to which ran through Mumbai. Members of Lashkar-e-Taiba, or the Righteous Army, their goal—messianic and mesmerizing—was to sow as much havoc in a city of 15 million as it was possible for 10 men to do. This was Mumbai’s own 9/11; and yet, unlike the assault on New York City and Washington, in which the killers perished in the first minutes of their meticulous dastardliness, Mumbai’s trauma lasted three whole days, with the terrorists at large, seemingly unstoppable, shooting people at close quarters, breaking down doors, slitting throats, hurling grenades, taking and killing hostages…and making phone calls.
We hear the phone ring as we watch, and it is as if it is ringing in our own living room. “When this is over,” Brother Wasi says, “there will be much more fear in the world.”
Terror in Mumbai, which airs Thursday at 8 p.m. Eastern on HBO, stands out most chillingly for one reason: It offers viewers almost 20 minutes of recordings of phone conversations between the terrorists in Mumbai and their controller in Pakistan, a man called “Brother Wasi.” These were recordings made in real time (is there any other sort of time, one wonders, when terrorists seize a city?) by Indian intelligence, and they reveal not the banality of evil but its quiet, unhurried self-satisfaction.
We hear the phone ring as we watch, and it is as if it is ringing in our own living room. “When this is over,” Brother Wasi says, “there will be much more fear in the world.” Another ring, another conversation, this time between Wasi and the bastards who have taken hold of the Taj Mahal Hotel, Mumbai’s—nay, Asia’s—finest hostelry. “Pile up the carpets and mattresses from the room you’ve opened,” Brother Wasi instructs. “Douse them with alcohol and set them alight. Get a couple of floors burning.”
Each time Wasi calls his terrorists in Mumbai, however heated the moment, there is a punctilious, chilling adherence to Muslim norms of intercourse. The phone rings; the gunman answers: “Assalam-o-alaikum.” And Wasi says, cool as an Islamist cucumber: “Walaikumsalam.” Everyday Muslim courtesies must be followed, even as infidels are cut down.
This is not a documentary for the young to watch, or even for those adults who crumble easily. How to process the telephone conversation between Wasi and the gunman holed up in Mumbai’s Chabad House, where a few American Jews are held hostage? Wasi says: “As I told you, every person you kill where you are”—referring to the Jewish building—“is worth 50 of the ones killed elsewhere.” Later, as Indian army commandos close in on the building, Wasi, watching the scene on TV in Pakistan, fears that the last surviving gunman there will be taken alive. So he orders him to shoot the last two Jewish hostages forthwith: “Yes, sit them up and shoot them in the back of the head.” The gunman, now weak with hunger and thirst, obliges. We hear a shot. Wasi does, too—he is on the line. What about the second shot, he asks. “I got them both,” he is told, by the gunman.
The terrorists killed 170 people; nine of the 10 terrorists were killed, and one—Ajmal Amir Kasab—was captured alive. Imagine the consternation when he turned out to be a brainwashed tool, a Pakistani peasant with no clear thoughts of his own, a man who was taught that, on being martyred, his body would emanate a sweet scent and his face would begin to glow. After Kasab’s colleagues were killed, the Mumbai police took him to the morgue to see their bodies. “We broke him psychologically,” a senior policeman says. In the morgue, Kasab saw no glowing faces, and detected no sweet scent; all he saw were the mangled, hideous, unheavenly corpses of his fellow terrorists. He knew, then, that “he had been taken for a ride.” In such primitive belief rests the fate of the innocent.







Lisarae
And this is why I believe our mission in the Middle East can not be achieved being fought, as is! This is not conventional War fare. Our soldiers are living their lives in prison for not following the rules? There are no rules. This is kill or be killed war fare, PERIOD!
saaddaas
I'm a moderate Muslim. I have a BBA in Finance from an respected university. I own my own business with my family and employ or help anyone in need, regardless of age,gender,creed, etc. I have spent a lot of time in the United states and abroad. I am 22 years old and I am not a terrorist.
Actually I hate terrorists as much as the next guy, more so because multiple friends and family members have been either killed, maimed, injured, or hurt in others ways because of terrorism. It's easy to say America is the greatest nation in the world but most who say this haven't been outside of the country for prolonged periods of time, I have and I know America is better than everywhere else, it is great and it has given me everything I am today. This said, I have been also subjected to discrimination and other forms of prejudice (from polite to plain violence). Bigotry, ignorance and hypocrisy can be found here. Most people talk about Islamic terrorism but what about Domestic Terrorism (Virginia Tech, Columbine, or the shootings in Florida the day after the Fort Hood massacre)?
To me Jesus (pbuh) and Mohammed (pbuh) profess the same things but in different ways. To people not familiar to Mohammed (pbuh) I recommened reading his Last Sermon to the Muslims, it will explain what Islam is essentially.
As to terrorism in India: India and Pakistan have a complex love-hate relationship. The people are basically the same but propaganda and external elements combined with unstable internal factions keep creating distractions for the people. I know this personally since I have spent at least 5 years apiece in both countries. I have friends that are Indian (Hindu and Muslim and Sikh!) and we get along fine. Individuals here then get along great its people as a whole that create distractions. Some do it for a gain of some sort and others have their own vendettas. We need to look at terrorism from all aspects. India had one bombing that became its 9/11, Pakistan has one everyday (i.e Peshwar, Islamabad, Lahore in the last few weeks), what do we call them? Believe me Pakistanis are as tired as terrorism as anyone else but for the most part neither the US forces or the Pakistani government have been able to do anything. Its like that proverb "you can't beat stupid" and thats what these people are, but you can't blame them. They have no jobs, no future prospects of having one and the only way of providing for their family is with the retirement by death benefits funded by a shiek who is himself attached to a dialysis machine in a cave some where. Do you see the ridiculousness of this all?
Sorry, but I don't have any solutions either.
Peace
KemCho
Welcome to TDB, Mr. Varadarajan. Hope you give some sanity to Tina's liberal mouthpiece. Blaming Infidels (Non-Muslims) will not solve this problem until moderate Muslim leaders speak up. I wonder if there are any left? How about rich kingdoms, what have they done to for their citizens education, women rights?
studentoflaw
moderate muslims have been denouncing these types of acts for years, and with increasing frequency. you just apparently prefer not to notice so that you can continue painting all muslims with a broad, terrorist brush.
altlic
There are undoubtedly complex reasons for the war between elements of Islam and the West. Moderate Muslims may be failing to abate the resurgence of radical Islam because the teachings of the Islamic faith are readily interpreted as commanding it's adherents to violently overthrow the infidels. Mohammad can be seen as the leader of a violent revolution.
I am not a scholar, but to compare Mohammad to Jesus: it would be as if Jesus told his followers to literally take up the sword and go to war against his enemies - and be merciless!
In other words, the actions of Al Qaeda, etc. may be 'righteous', and the West is mistaken in thinking of them as deviants.
(Watch "Islam: What the West Needs to Know" It's propaganda, but it makes some good points.)
Johnnorth
Good forthright contribution of Mr.V. . I'm sick of the political correctness about those Muslim radicals who did to Mumbai what they had done , on a larger scale, to New York- let's call them for what they are: ignorant maniacs. As for Beast being a liberal mouthpiece, I hadn't noticed anything except an open door for vigorous writing.
sunman
Tunku----this is one proud infidel who is sick and tired of the apologists who blame the victims rather than the suicidal jihadists. Your article is a breath of fresh air, your 'balancing act' is calling what it really is--Misogyny and barbarism in guise of holy war, complete with perpetual orgy in afterlife. Are all youth around the world suffering from unemployment and frustration turning to terrorism -or is it the privilege of those who follow the religion of peace? The intercepted phone calls between the terrorists and their handlers in Pakistan give us a unique insight of the mindset of these "people". Do you think the Indian police should have read Kasab, the captured terrorist, Miranda rights after he was seen by more than 500 people hurling grenades and firing indiscriminately at women and children waiting for the train? Sure, you should encourage moderate Muslims---but as far as the one who are looking for 72 willing women (for a change) ---there can only be one solution.
Shaemus
Mumbai was NOT India's 9/11. I'd highly recommend reading Arundhati Roy's take rather than Mr. Varadarajan who has so skewed this topic to paranoia that it's not even intelligent dialogue.
Read her piece in the Guardian.
cmwweber
I was in Mumbai during the terrorist attacks. Muslims were slaughtered alongside Jews, Hindus, Christians, Sikhs, and others too. To their great credit, the non-Muslims of Mumbai did not exact reprisals against Muslims. And for their part, Muslims in the city spoke out firmly and strongly against terrorism, refused to bury the deceased terrorists in their graveyards, and swiftly extended their sympathies to the Jewish community for the loss of life at Nariman House. (The Muslim and Jewish communities there have long-standing ties). Sanity has not always reined in such an exemplary fashion in the city, but it did this time. It's a worthy example to follow.
stever
Here is the best eyewitness account of the whole crisis:
http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/four-days-of-terror-in-mumbai-january-09
Fareed Zakaria really is a silly self regarding fellow - Tunku is too kind to him
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.