Blogs and Stories
The CIA's Secret Grief
Greg Mathieson / Landov
When agency officers die in the field, their identities and missions often remain shrouded in mystery. 60 Minutes’ Howard L. Rosenberg—who with correspondent Lara Logan recently reported on on the CIA’s operations in Afghanistan—on what's ahead for the families of the 7 employees killed last week.
Death in the shadow world of spies and covert operators has the same finality as any other, but with an odd exception. The grieving families left behind mourn in grim darkness, their loved ones’ sacrifice still hidden beneath the cover of “diplomatic service” or “assistance efforts.”
Symbols of their faceless and, for some, nameless sacrifice will be added to the CIA’s Memorial Wall, etched into the white marble of the old headquarters’ north lobby, which already bears stars paying tribute to 90 other employees who died in service. Beside the wall is an accompanying "Book of Honor.” In it are the names of 55 of the fallen officers. The identities of the rest remain classified, and are represented in the book only by a gold star followed by a blank space.
I thought of that sad truth last week, when news broke of the suicide bombing at Forward Operating Base Chapman near Khost, Afghanistan. The small outpost is hard up against the border region along the Afghan/Pakistan border and a hub of CIA counterinsurgency, intelligence collection, and Predator drone targeting activity. Seven U.S. CIA employees and one Jordanian intelligence officer died.
Asked about the deaths last week, legendary former CIA officer Henry Crumpton answered simply, “I knew them.”
“We sleep soundly in our beds,” Winston Churchill supposedly said in paraphrasing a letter from George Orwell to Rudyard Kipling, “because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." The sentiment remains apt as the U.S. and its allies battle against a stateless enemy. But the characterization falls short in describing many of those on the front lines of the 21st century, and especially those who died at Forward Operating Base Chapman.
The victims there included the unidentified chief of the post at FOB Chapman, a mother of three young children, as well as two contract employees of Xe (formerly known as Blackwater), and four CIA employees whose families have released their names: Harold E. Brown Jr. of Massachusetts, 37; Scott Michael Roberson of Ohio, 39, a former U.S. Navy Seal; and Jeremy Wise of Arkansas, 35. Brown left behind his college-sweetheart wife and three children. Roberson was a security officer new to the agency, whose wife is due to give birth to their first child next month. Wise, who is survived by a wife and young son, was memorialized in a Facebook posting.
Another slain CIA officer was Elizabeth Hanson, 31, an Illinois native and a 2001 graduate of Colby College. A family friend posted notice of her death to friends on Facebook, describing Hanson as "effervescent" and "vibrant."
I first saw the somber CIA Memorial Wall and book at the side of Henry “Hank” Crumpton, a legendary former CIA officer. Hank’s almost-mythic reputation has been chronicled in bits and pieces—though usually pseudonymously. He was simply called "Henry" by the 9/11 Commission Report and in Bob Woodward's Bush at War, and "Hank" in others. His full name is Henry A. Crumpton, a wiry Georgian who spent the greatest part of his adult life hidden in the covert world of espionage and counterterrorism in Africa and South Asia.
Henry Crumpton tells 60 Minutes how he thinks the U.S. should deal with terrorists and insurgents hiding in Pakistan. Full episode here.
Bucking the tight-lipped conventions of the spy trade, Crumpton agreed to sit for a series of lengthy interviews with 60 Minutes for a segment that aired Dec. 27. Correspondent Lara Logan and I traveled to Afghanistan with Crumpton, who conceived and executed the daring strategy that ousted the Taliban and al Qaeda from the country in the months after 9/11, with just a handful of CIA officers and military special operations units allied with thousands of Afghan tribal warriors.
His goal in taking 60 Minutes to Afghanistan, Crumpton said, was to try and explain the complex and deadly threat the U.S. faces there. "Wherever al Qaeda or its affiliates establish safe haven," he warned, "it is a threat to the United States.” Crumpton said he believes part of the solution is to create an "expeditionary" State Department that projects "soft power" in a four-to-one ratio with "hard" or military power once territory is secured. By soft power, he means building infrastructure and providing health care and economic development.








DakLak
They played a dangerous game and lost because they let their guard down.
Tough, but that's war - phony or not.
Mick-BNE11
"Their failures are known, but their successes are not known." Heard it somewhere...fighting terrorism is not a joke..
opedanderson
They knew the risks and god bless them for taking them but can you expect to wage war and not take casualties.
I grieve for them and their families but the CIA has done many bad things to many people and you cannot expect to do that forever without taking hits.
Btw, just today we hear of a drone killing 12 people in pakistan. While I am sure some, most of them even, were the bad guys and had it coming to them, we all know that there was certainly some "collateral damage" on some innocents. Who wouldn't want to avenge that? How can we criticize that?
Mick-BNE11
That's why you need human intelligence and targeted approach, even thought, it is very dangerous and difficult.
External
One details that surprises me: Why were there 2 Xe contractors with the CIA team?
opedanderson
A contractor is someone who fixes your roof. These guys are mercenaries. And mercenaries are necessary because the military cannot find enough "volunteers".
sre6536
People like you encourge and give aide to these people that want to kill all of us, including you. Wake up and get off the Kool aide.
genx65
All give some. Some give all. God bless each and everyone of them.
amapola101
To all the families and the CIA community my,deepest felt sympathy and thank you to all of you. War is ugly espionage is uglier.It needs to be used be for necessities,only when we need to attack or survive. We have no buss among these terrorist.,in Afghan and nowhere near them.But our CIA memebers and soldiers are decent ,humane, fighters.Doing their jobs,their orders.They are not cowards,and people who explode themselves, As long as the religion conciders this a blessing there is a sick problem. Our soldiers do not behead others,and do not hide among children,and women.Something terrible,went wrong.here, he earned the trust of americans. We do not think like inhuman animals.Like terrorist.this is a big loss.My deepest,heartfelt sorrow to all & this community.,
felipe
"people who explode themselves..."
did it ever occur to you that they have to use what they have? If A/Q had Predator style drones, they probably would use them.
Let me put it this way i'm 5'7", 150lbs. If I get fight with Mike Tyson I am picking up anything I can get my hands on. How can you blame them for doing the same?
Not everybody has the means to keep their hands nice and clean by killing the enemy from a computer terminal.
External
Felipe
You forgot to add: from a computer terminal while still living in the homefront culture, with the wife and kids , either on the west coast of the US or Langley and using the technology for the front line trigger pullers
atrueamerican
Any one else with me think that maybe Felipe should go live in the mountains of Afgahnistan with his terrorist buddies? Seriously dude, it doesn't matter if they were spies, soldiers, or contractors what matters is that they were AMERICAN something obvilously you are not.
MichaelMoore
Henry Crumpton is right on the mark. This specific war needs to be run like a business. Use the right tools that are most effective, and once an area has been secured, keep it that way with conventional forces. Using our insurgents, along with private contractors is the most effective, cost saving way to accomplish things. Maiming and slaughtering members of our armed forces is NOT cost effective. Look at the problems we are having with the VA at this moment.
Please remember - every nation on the face of the earth has in intelligence agency. Ours happens to be reasonably effective.
AacB27
Maybe I shouldn't be shocked by the comments above, but I am. They are almost sympathetic to the deaths of enemy combatants. While I don't like the loss of civilian life, it is a zero sum game--us or them. That's why we are fighting a war --the stakes are THAT high. Why are we resigned to thinking we should have retaliation coming? Maybe we are too far removed from the front lines to understand that if we were not fighting the enemy on their soil, and it were the other way around, WE would be the ones getting shot at, bombed, etc. Be glad that you are not being shot up, be glad that people are willing to risk it all for you so the war won't be in our backyards with our kids. When did we stop being on our own side?
To the families who lost their loved ones, it is the most unselfish love they had for their country and apparently the most thankless.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.