U.S. News

More U.S. News

America's 20 Highest Earning Cities

by Richard Florida Info

Richard Florida
 
  • Share

Wondering where you earn the highest incomes? Richard Florida and his team have put together the definitive list—from D.C. to Fairbanks.

According to a new Regional Income Earnings Index developed by the Martin Prosperity Institute, Greater Washington, D.C. is the nation's metropolitan region with the highest income. The index measures income trends across all 342 of America’s metro regions.

View our list of the 20 Highest Earning Cities in America

HP Main - Affluent Cities

San Jose (in California's Silicon Valley) and Stamford, Connecticut, tie for second place. San Francisco and Boston round out the top five. Surprisingly, Greater New York ranks 16th on the MPI Affluence Index, behind Seattle, Boulder, Minneapolis-St. Paul, and Greater Baltimore. Two Alaska regions score in the top 20—Anchorage in seventh place and Fairbanks in 19th. Massachusetts and Minnesota each have two regions in the top 20 as well.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

High-income regions tend to have populations that are highly educated and skilled—what economists refer to as higher levels of human capital. Regions with more knowledge-based, professional, and creative jobs have higher incomes on average, as do regions with high concentrations of high-tech industries.

Many of these high-income metros also have high costs of living. Housing costs in Washington, San Francisco, Boston, Silicon Valley, Greater New York, Boulder, and Honolulu are among the highest in the nation; their housing cost-to-income ratios are dauntingly steep. Still, incomes are high enough that most of the people and families in these places have more money left over, even after paying for housing and other essentials, than those in most lower-earning areas, according to our research. Other high-income regions, like Minneapolis-St. Paul have a much lower cost of living.

The gap separating the regions with the highest and lowest incomes is substantial. With a median household income of more than $85,000, and median individual income and per capita income levels in excess of $40,000, Greater Washington's income levels are more than double those of America's lowest income metros. The flip side of this growing income inequality is a deepening economic geography of wealth and class.

This gap is only likely to worsen as our economy continues its inexorable transformation from a manufacturing-based industrial system to an idea-driven post-industrial one and as highly skilled people, high-tech industries, and high-paying jobs continue to concentrate in some regions and not others. This is an issue of pressing national concern; new and innovative public-policy strategies are badly needed.

The MPI Regional Income Earnings Index is based on three equally weighted measures of income: median household income, median income, and per capita income. The data are from the U.S. Census Bureau for the year 2008.

Richard Florida is director of the University of Toronto’s Martin Prosperity Institute and author of The Great Reset, published by Harper Collins.

With Charlotta Mellander conducted the statistical analysis.

Patrick Adler provided research assistance.

Get a head start with the Morning Scoop email. It's your Cheat Sheet with must reads from across the Web. Get it.

For inquiries, please contact The Daily Beast at editorial@thedailybeast.com.


July 14, 2010 | 2:15am
  • Share
Comments ()

hockeydog

The Martin Prosperity Institute???

Are their numbers credible? For example they reference San Francisco as being home to 110 of the Forbes top 100.

|
|
Reply
8:39 am, Jul 14, 2010

This user is no longer registered.

|
|
Reply
|
9:57 am, Jul 14, 2010

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
12:51 pm, Aug 3, 2010

Don_Liston

Cities in Alaska are the support areas for a state that is twice as large as Texas with a population of just over three quarters of a million people. In the years after the "discovery" of oil on the North Slope, the legislators began a program to keep the money from natural resources in funds that would yield interest long after the resources were depleted.
Two main ideas prevail, first Alaska will never have a large population while most people seek heat and abhor cold. Second: most people come to Alaska to earn better pay than they can elsewhere and often get ahead of the game for the first time in their lives. The high incomes are the result of all employers having to pay enough to entice people to live in a cold climate. These factors are not found in most other states.
Our "high cost of living" just reflects an economic reality.

|
|
Reply
12:22 pm, Jul 14, 2010

Baddchild

Not the brightest bulb in the reporting world are ya.... Hartford Mayor Eddie Perez(D) a rising star????? Last month he resigned after being found guilty on 5 of 6 counts of corruption. As a journalist you would have heard about this if he had an (R) after his name but since your cohorts do their best to cover up Democratic coruption by notreporting it and you end up looking stupid. Go figure.

|
|
Reply
12:52 pm, Jul 14, 2010

Aslanleon

I recall when I was living in a small town in Maine as a pastor and my daughter had a high paying job with an insurance company and lived in New York. Their family income was three times ours. I lived in a 2500 square foot house with a garden, an orchard, and a pleasant view of the Kennebec River. I owned two cars, a sailboat, and a motorcycle. She and her husband lived in a 600 square foot apartment with a view of Madison Square Garden and owned some nice furniture.

Somehow, I never thought it was a good strategy to improve my living standard to change places with them.

|
|
Reply
1:18 pm, Jul 14, 2010

Aslanleon

Well, I'm out to launch. Time and tide wait for no one. If the Humboldt Squid don't get me, I'll be back at sundown.

|
|
Reply
1:37 pm, Jul 14, 2010

Brian Crouch

Worries me a bit that a place with no manufacturing output, no large productive economy, is the place with the highest incomes. Is this related to the recession throughout the rest of the productive private economy? Most Washington DC workforce is in government, govt. support, non-profits, or tourism...

|
|
Reply
9:15 pm, Jul 14, 2010

matucker

WHY CAN'T WE ALL GET ALONG
As for Mexico why can't we adopt this country and make them part ot us and use all the security and military resources protecting the borders around Mexico to wipe out all the drugs comming into the US from Mexico. It is a win win situation and it would be great to vacation anywhere in Mexico. The Hispansic community would get good salaries in their own town and we could all work together and move business from here to there and vicesa versa I think it would be a great stimulus and let the President of Mexico still be the Governor of his State. Hey we adoppted HAWAII RIGHT???????

|
|
Reply
|
3:26 pm, Jul 15, 2010

VictoryMusicInc

This Would Definitely Stimulate The Economy,And That's Not Even Thinking About The Natural Resources And Cheap Labor-The Smartest Thing I Ever Heard Till This Day.
If You Run For President I Will Vote For You!.


As for Mexico why can't we adopt this country and make them part ot us and use all the security and military resources protecting the borders around Mexico to wipe out all the drugs comming into the US from Mexico. It is a win win situation and it would be great to vacation anywhere in Mexico. The Hispansic community would get good salaries in their own town and we could all work together and move business from here to there and vicesa versa I think it would be a great stimulus and let the President of Mexico still be the Governor of his State. Hey we adoppted HAWAII RIGHT???????

|
|
Reply
5:52 am, Aug 3, 2010

Rj Nieto

I was about to believe this until I tried to visit the MARTIN PROSPERITY site and my antivirus prompted me NOT TO.

|
|
Reply
9:04 am, Jul 27, 2010
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

YOUR FRIENDS