Newsmax Appears to Distort Legal Expert’s Comments After CNN Interview
According to Mediaite, it turns out that Norm Eisen wasn’t saying what the right-wing network made viewers believe he was.
Newsmax omitted vital context while airing a CNN legal analyst’s comments Tuesday, in effect distorting his words to make viewers believe he said something he didn’t.
As noted by Mediaite, Carl Higbie Frontline played a brief clip of Norm Eisen talking Monday on CNN International’s Connect the World about how the Supreme Court heard arguments surrounding social media companies’ abilities to moderate content they deem objectionable. Florida and Texas are seeking to curtail them, claiming conservatives are being discriminated against.
Newsmax, however, clipped Eisen’s remarks, instead beginning in the middle of a sentence: “Social media companies can’t discriminate against conservatives. And no matter how crazy a conservative message may be, it’s simply not allowed to discriminate against them or anyone…But is there a middle ground where they have to give an equal platform? That’s what these cases are about,” he said.
Host Carl Higbie then reacted: “That’s kind of my point here, is like, look, this is a liberal legal analyst on CNN saying that they can’t do that.”
ADVERTISEMENT
However, that’s not the case at all.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Eisen’s full comments on Connect the World show that he was summarizing what the lawyers for Florida and Texas are pushing for.
“This case that has made it now to argument at the Supreme Court is about two statutes—one passed in the state of Texas, and one law in the state of Florida—that essentially say social media companies can’t discriminate against conservatives, and no matter how crazy your conservative message may be, it’s simply not allowed to discriminate against them or anyone,” Eisen said.
Social media platforms need to be able to moderate dangerous content
— Norm Eisen (norm.eisen on Threads) (@NormEisen) February 26, 2024
But laws in FL & TX argue that they have no say in who says what—is there a middle ground?
I discussed the landmark case SCOTUS is hearing today @cnni w @EleniGiokos pic.twitter.com/2r6hdVIeI7
What’s more is that Eisen, in the very next breath, calls that argument an “extreme view of the law,” citing terroristic threats or “insane health advice” on a social media platform. Newsmax omitted that portion of his comments from its broadcast, instead jumping ahead.
“So, it can’t be the case that these social media companies have no ability to make these choices in what they do and do not put up,” Eisen went on. “But those are the questions maybe the Supreme Court will find in the extreme cases, the social media companies can act. But is there a middle ground where they have to give an equal platform? That’s what these cases are about.”
A representative for Newsmax did not respond to a request for comment. The Daily Beast also contacted Eisen, but he did not respond in time for publication.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
