Poll Question: Has Obama Gone Too Far in His Criticisms of the Supreme Court?—David Frum

President Obama made headlines this week for suggesting that the Supreme Court overturning his healthcare bill's individual mandate would be "an unprecedented, extraordinary step" of judicial activism.
The Washington Examiner reported that the President's press secretary was clarifying those comments after a broad spectrum of conservatives lambasted them.
"What the president did was make an unremarkable observation about 80 years of [judicial] history," White House spokesman Jay Carney said. "That's the opposite of intimidation."
However Salon pointed out that, for all of the Republican talk of "intimidation," the President really had no power to influence the justices:
ADVERTISEMENT
Of course, the Republican talking point is that the president is attempting to bully the Court into ruling the way he wants. (Because if they strike down the law, he’ll … yell at them during the State of the Union again? No one seriously predicts an arrest warrant for Chief Justice Roberts here.)
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Did the President overstep his bounds by criticizing the Court or were his statements "unremarkable?" Has Obama gone too far in his criticisms of the Supreme Court? Vote now on Facebook!
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
