Trump Handed Another Loss as Judge Dismisses His ‘Big Lie’ CNN Lawsuit
The former president’s claim that CNN likened him to Adolf Hitler by referring to “the Big Lie” has officially flopped.

Reuters/Marco Bello
Donald Trump’s already-shaky defamation lawsuit against CNN officially flopped Friday, with the federal judge he appointed dismissing the case despite his pleas that the network had associated him with Adolf Hitler.
The lawsuit centered around CNN’s coverage of Trump after his failed 2020 bid for re-election, where the network repeatedly used the term “the Big Lie” to refer to Trump’s claims the election was stolen.
Trump asserted the phrase likened him to Hitler because it’s been used to describe lies told by the Nazis to justify atrocities in the Holocaust. Trump claimed the phrase defamed him and suggested to viewers he’d be “Hitler-like” in a future political position.
Judge Raag Singhal disagreed, however. In a motion to dismiss seen by The Daily Beast, he wrote that Trump’s claims were a “stacking of inferences that cannot support a finding of falsehood.” In short, the claims against CNN didn’t amount to defamation under federal law.
ADVERTISEMENT
“CNN’s use of the phrase ‘the Big Lie’ in connection with Trump’s election challenges does not give rise to a plausible inference that Trump advocates the persecution and genocide of Jews or any other group of people,” Singhal wrote. “No reasonable viewer could (or should) plausibly make that reference.”
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Trump was demanding $475 million in the suit, which was filed in the Southern District of Florida—the jurisdiction that covers Mar-a-Lago, his Palm Beach estate.
The former president had pointed to five instances where “the Big Lie” was used to describe his unfounded election claims—some stated live on air, others in opinion pieces published on CNN’s website. The suit said CNN refused to retract the phrases when asked.
Singhal made clear he wasn’t a fan of CNN using the phrase, saying it was “odious and repugnant” to use it or other potential references to Hitler and the Holocaust in news stories.
Despite this, Singhal acknowledged, “bad rhetoric is not defamation when it does not include false statements of fact.” And, as has been proven in numerous recounts and audits, Trump’s claims about the 2020 election were indeed lies.
As of Saturday morning, Trump had made no acknowledgment of his loss in court.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
