Obama’s Moment to Call Us to a Greater Collective Commitment
To get to “we,” Obama’s speech needs to avoid “I” and “they,” writes Mark McKinnon.
People walk on the National Mall in front of the Washington Monument on Sunday as D.C. prepares for President Obama’s second inauguration. (Mario Tama/Getty)
Here’s what I don’t want to hear in President Obama’s inaugural address:
The word “I.” A recap of his first term. How hard things have been. No straw men. No references to “they.” As in, “They said we couldn’t, or shouldn’t take on ... [fill in your favorite agenda item].” No blaming Republicans for obstructionism. No whining. No excuses. No long speech.
To borrow a signature phrase, let me be clear: This day is not about him. It’s about us. Our nation. Our future. Where do we go from here? What is the right path forward? How do we come together?
We have been given so much. Yet so much is left to be done. But we are Americans. And today that is what we celebrate.
Democracy is but an experiment in the long history of the world. And ours, rarer still: a representative republic, a country owned by the people. One people. An idea enshrined in our founding documents and echoed years later by Abraham Lincoln in the Gettysburg address. Ours is a government of the people, by the people, for the people. An ideal sanctified by the blood of many who came before us and by those forgotten who fight in our name still.
Here’s what I do want to hear:
The word “we.” A call to a greater collective commitment. A recognition of the sacrifices to come. A signal of willingness to do the unpopular, to take on his political base. A surprise or two. Humility. Faith. Gratitude. And keep it short.
To borrow a signature phrase, let me be clear: This day is not about him. It’s about us.
How great a legacy to leave: To call together an anxious nation. To calm the divide and ask brothers to lay down their arms. To inspire them to a greater cause—to fight not against each other, but alongside each other for something far greater than ourselves.
This day, this country, this future—it is ours. Will he answer the call? And will we?
Obama Has 'No Problem' With NSA Activity
President Obama tried to dispel concerns over NSA spying on 'Charlie Rose' Monday, saying 'if you are a U.S. person, the NSA cannot listen to your telephone calls, and the NSA cannot target your emails... and have not.' So what's the big deal, right? Right?
The Whistleblower
How’d He Get the Data?
Laura Colarusso on how Edward Snowden, who wasn’t directly employed by the government, got top-secret intel.
Surveillance
Behold the NSA’s Dark Star
Bush III
How Obama Embraced NSA Spying
Dialed In
Phone Records Shared With U.K.
Big Brother?
Behind the NSA Spying Program
SCOTUS
The Supreme Court's Big Month
Three Mondays in June
Every week this month, the Supreme Court will hand down rulings. Josh Dzieza on what’s at stake.
Easy Fix
The Reality of Illegal Immigration
States' Rights
The Other Voting Case
Resign Now, Holder
Pentagon papers lawyer James Goodale has seen Holder’s actions before—in Richard Nixon.







Comments