Blogs and Stories

Sandra McElwaine

The History of Michelle's Arms

Plus: Check out Fashion Beast, for more news on the latest runway shows, hot designers, and trends emerging from the tents

Michelle Obama's arms may be the talk of the town, but she actually owes the look to Jackie, Dolley and-as if her husband needed another Lincoln tie, Mary Todd. By Sandra McElwaine. VIEW OUR GALLERY.

Simply everyone is talking about it (or them) everywhere I go. Whether it’s a high-powered dinner, lunch with a close friend, a book club or a cocktail party: you can’t escape the subject—Michelle Obama’s unrelenting sleeveless look, and namely, her gorgeous, toned arms. In the midst of a conversation about the thorny issues of the day someone will mention those limbs. But so far as I can tell, what all the very opinionated people have neglected to mention, is that Michelle is hardly the first first lady to bare her arms. In fact, one of the first ladies most notorious for doing so was—dare I even say it—Mary Todd Lincoln.

Click Image To View Gallery

Article - McElwaine Michelle Arms

Now I agree: Michelle is tight and taut and delightfully wields the power of glamour. But enough already! Mrs. Lincoln too was known for her round, well-proportioned arms and could, on occasion, stun her husband by the depth of her décolletage. Michelle has simply turned toned arms into a bold, new fashion statement. Anatomical discussions around the proverbial watercooler used to revolve around legs or boobs or butts or toes, or even a serious wardrobe malfunction à la Janet Jackson. Not anymore. Not since the high-gloss first lady started flaunting those glistening ab-fab Obama-arms, the body part du jour.

While other first ladies were not necessarily known for baring arms—with the exception of Jackie O., who often wore the same type of sleeveless, jewel-neck dresses as Michelle does—they all made their distinct fashion statements. Nancy Reagan was a passionate fashionista in her borrowed finery from Adolfo and Galanos. Her wardrobe was genteel and lady-like, although she definitely raised eyebrows when attending a high-powered dinner in white satin toreador pants. Rosalyn Carter was frugal and simple. Her inaugural gown was off the rack in Plains, Georgia—and it was the same one she wore to her husband’s inauguration as governor of Georgia. (People joke it was so dreary the Smithsonian, which displays all the first ladies’ inaugural gowns, did not want to accept it.)

Then there was Dolley Madison, who dazzled the capital with bold colors, turbans, even ostrich feathers; and Frances Folsom Cleveland, who became mistress of the White House when she was only 21, and infuriated the Women’s Christian Temperance Union when she wore gowns that bared her shoulders. (They petitioned her to stop because it they said it was “an evil influence on other young American girls.” She never responded, commented, or changed her sexy style.) As for Hillary Clinton, what’s to say except that she made pantsuits acceptable for both day and night. Bless her for that!

Frances Folsom Cleveland infuriated the Women’s Christian Temperance Union when she wore gowns that bared her shoulders. They petitioned her to stop because it was “an evil influence on other young American girls.”

But back to Michelle and her finely toned arms. There she is on the cover of Vogue in a sleeveless crimson Jason Wu sheath dress. Then the cover of People, same style, this time a frothy pink. At the Alfalfa dinner, she was bare-armed in a sumptuous crushed raspberry dress, and for her official portrait she chose stunning black which once again revealed the firmest triceps, biceps, and deltoids in town. Even on the coldest nights of the year—OK, she’s from Chicago and she has a limo—she feels compelled to don a sleeveless frock and flash those lanky, flab-free arms.

Maybe what has captured public attention and caused all the brouhaha is not just Michelle’s choice to bare arms, but her obvious devotion to physical fitness. Betty Ford had the body of a dancer, which she once was, lithe and graceful. But she rarely revealed her torso. Once I spent the better part of a week at the White House doing an “Upstairs Downstairs” story for Vogue, and remember Mrs. Ford showing me her large mirrored closet. It contained a raft of pretty chiffon gowns, but there was certainly nothing outré about them. Michelle pumps iron and works out with a personal trainer for 90 minutes, three times a week, sometimes as early as 5:30 am—with her husband. Betty and Nancy and Jackie certainly didn’t do that.

In all seriousness, and with all due respect to her, someone should tell Michelle to mix up her wardrobe and cover up from time to time. I’m beginning to think she has an Arnold Schwarzenegger complex. Mary Todd Lincoln was a major shopaholic, addicted to French fashion. In one extremely bizarre indulgence, she purchased 400 pairs of gloves over a period of four months. Gloves might be an answer for Michelle, too. She could show up on her next magazine cover buff, sculpted, and wearing those same elegant, long white kid ones. Above the elbow, of course. I’m not sure about the warmth factor, but think what she could do for the glove industry!

Sandra McElwaine is a Washington-based journalist. She has been a reporter for the Washington Star, the Baltimore Sun, a correspondent for CNN and People and Washington editor of Vogue and Cosmopolitan. She writes for The Washington Post, Time and Forbes.


Back to Top
March 4, 2009 | 6:03am
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
6:37 am, Mar 4, 2009

smdunne

Michelle is fabulous.

|
|
Reply
7:43 am, Mar 4, 2009

fk4711

Leave Michelle alone. She is fabulous and I hope media leave her be herself.

|
|
Reply
8:04 am, Mar 4, 2009

Bettie

Thank goodness, somebody has said what I have been thinking for the past month. Michelle is risking becoming known as a shopaholic,, not good in the present economy.

She is overshadowing her husband when Jack Cafferty gets a crush on her. And as Kingbarry said above, her bare arms detract from a massive bottom. Some advise Michelle, stay out of the news for a week or so.

|
|
Reply
9:54 am, Mar 4, 2009

AtomicLaura

her arms are buff so she can help her man raise those taxes

|
|
Reply
10:08 am, Mar 4, 2009

watersedge

Great arms, but what about that belly? There were bets going on during the inauguration that she was expecting, maybe even twins. But no news of that. That 90 minute work out needs to be more concentrated on the belly and less on the arms.

|
|
Reply
10:25 am, Mar 4, 2009

MERMO11

Kingbarry,
when I read your comment I couldn't help but picture you on your 1970s-ish couch eating a bag of potato chips and scratching your junk. In other words "your white shirt can't cover up your red neck." Very distasteful, and horribly worded. now to the topic... Michelle is fine, of course she is going to get a bunch of publicity! Her husband is the first black president of the USA! I know in the past there have been some dreadfully dressed first ladies on both Republican as well as Democrat's terms. Before we stone Michelle in the streets, lets not forget how much Laura Bush loves Oscar De Larenta. It's ok! part of their job as first lady is to look good!

|
|
Reply
11:02 am, Mar 4, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--MrRepublican
|
|
Reply
11:03 am, Mar 4, 2009

judgeinmillvalley

I am shocked that you would screen but then accept Kingbarryofdc's racist comments that do nothing except lower the level of this discussion and the Huffington Post.

If you have something intelligent to say,Kingbarryofdc, aside from discussing the First Lady's backside and your idea of what blacks really want--as if you would know but evidently think about to some degree-- then don't hesitate. We'll give you another chance to show your intelligence and your American spirit.

Otherwise, don't sully this website with your "free speech." In definition, free speech never gives anyone the right to cry fire in a crowded theater when there is no fire.

|
|
Reply
11:39 am, Mar 4, 2009

mcclue

sandra mcelwaine, journalist: let's try to keep standards high. You meant "taut", right? Not "taught"?

|
|
Reply
11:44 am, Mar 4, 2009

dcfilm

Great arms or not -- it was inappropriate to show them during her husband's speech. Her bare arms look is becoming a tic that is overshadowing her and could end up defining a person who has much more to offer the universe than muscle tone.

|
|
Reply
11:56 am, Mar 4, 2009

LitaMarieH

MrRepublican, did you catch the video of Anne Coulter (it's still on the video cheat sheet) talking about how she was dissapointed that the expanse of "hot babes" at CPAC weren't the ones put on camera? You think liberals only care about looking good on camera? Cindy McCain always looked fabulous, and Sarah Palin got tons of coverage about her wardrobe. So don't say that all of the "who looks good" hype is liberal-based.

|
|
Reply
12:44 pm, Mar 4, 2009

joymars

She's being provocative and sexy. That's fine. She's being fashionable and has many designers to choose from and fashion gurus to pow-wow with. Her choices are deliberate.

But she needs to remember that fashion fulfills many expectations. One of them is to fascinate. Repetition does not fascinate. Finding a signature style is the sign of a mature creative woman. Walking that fine line between personal signature and boring repetition is the trick to pull off.

I liked the aubergine dress she wore for the speech. It is odd that she was the only person in that huge room on that cold night who was sleeveless. But it isn't a fashion mistake per se.

What I'm not too happy with is the official portrait. It isn't merely sleeveless. The dress's cut is closer to a "halter top." This is a silhouette that has always been considered "baring" and is associated with formal gowns and summer wear.

This dress is indeed a gown, and since the rest of it is cropped off in the picture, it looks like an odd sort of day dress. She wants to telegraph sexiness, strength, youth, independent style. I'd say, go for it Michelle, but remember to fascinate too.

Jackie knew how to be young, stylish and to maintain a mysterious allure. Maybe the later is not Michelle's style. She's a working woman. Let's see how long being a fashion-plate can last for her. After a while she just might want to turn this sort of attention off.

|
|
Reply
1:02 pm, Mar 4, 2009

Mary50

I continue to be perplexed by the media obsession with the First Lady. I still remember some of the horrible things she said during the campaign, and every time I listen to her speak today, I keep trying to see what all the fuss is about, and I just don't get it. I don't even get what is spectacular about her arms and I don't think she's all that glamorous. But then again, I didn't get the obsession with Jackie O.'s arms/glamour either.

By the way, agree that kingbarry's comments are disgusting. For some reason every article about a woman on this site is followed by disgusting comments from some pervert. The article on Meghan McCain was even worse.

|
|
Reply
1:23 pm, Mar 4, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--MrRepublican
|
|
Reply
1:39 pm, Mar 4, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

The History of Michelle's Arms

by Sandra McElwaine

Info
RSS
Sandra McElwaine
Emails
|
print
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |