Blogs and Stories

Max  Blumenthal

Palin's New Disaster

BS Top - Blumenthal Palin Ross 174 Rick Bowmer / AP Photo The governor is reeling after nominating for attorney general a man who allegedly defended the right of men to rape their wives. Now, Max Blumenthal reports, she may dump him to save herself.

While priming her political machine for a likely 2012 presidential primary run, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has fomented a scandal that threatens to further erode her reputation in the Last Frontier. In March, Palin nominated Wayne Anthony Ross for attorney general. Ross, a colorful far-right lawyer and longtime Palin ally who sports his initials, W.A.R., on his Hummer’s vanity plates, was once considered a shoo-in for confirmation. However, his nomination was thrown into grave peril when his opponents presented evidence that he called homosexuals “degenerates,” leveled invective against an African-American student offended by a statue of a Klansman, vowed to undermine the sovereignty of Native American tribes, and allegedly defended men who rape their wives. According to two sources close to the confirmation hearings, Palin may ask Ross to withdraw before his appointment comes to a vote.

According to Burton, who detailed the allegations for me, Ross allegedly declared during a speech before a 1991 gathering of the “father’s rights” group Dads Against Discrimination, “If a guy can’t rape his wife, who’s he gonna rape?”

Palin’s hopes for a swift confirmation process were dashed April 10 when Leah Burton, a veteran lobbyist on children’s issues and domestic violence, submitted a letter to the Alaska State Judiciary Committee claiming that Ross publicly defended spousal rape. According to Burton, who detailed the allegations for me, Ross allegedly declared during a speech before a 1991 gathering of the “father’s rights” group Dads Against Discrimination, “If a guy can’t rape his wife, who’s he gonna rape?” (In a subsequent letter, Ross denied the remark and claimed, “I don’t talk like that!”)

Burton said Ross’s statement was consistent with his overarching attitude toward women’s issues. She claimed that he once said during a debate on the Equal Rights Amendment, “If a woman would keep her mouth shut, there wouldn’t be an issue with domestic violence.” Burton also maintained she has been in touch with “a number” of domestic-violence victims who witnessed Ross make “horrible” statements, but are too intimidated to speak out. “Alaska is a very small state and it’s terrifying for these victims to come forward because they’re afraid of retribution,” Burton told me.

Since Burton’s testimony, her father, former Alaska Public Safety Commissioner Richard Burton, wrote a letter of his own demanding to Ross that he withdraw his nomination. “You sir, speak and act like the kind of bully I met many times when responding to domestic-violence calls, some of the most dangerous situations police officers are often in,” Burton wrote. Ross reacted with characteristic fury to the Burtons’ broadsides, barking to reporters that if “anybody said that to me, we'd have a little confrontation because that's a bunch of crap.” At the same time, a grassroots group raising support for Palin's presidential bid called Conservatives4Palin attacked Leah Burton as an anti-Christian "fringe nutcase."

But as pro-Palin forces attempted to push back against Ross’s critics, dozens of op-eds Ross authored during the 1980s and 1990s surfaced as key exhibits in the case against his confirmation. Among them is a 1993 piece entitled, “KKK ‘art’ project gets ‘A’ for courage,” in which Ross defended a local college student who had offended an African-American classmate by creating a statue of a Klansman with a cross in one hand and a flag in the other. “It might have been fun to see [the African-American student] try to remove the display,” Ross wrote. “Then she could have been arrested and her future as a student of the university could have been resolved through the university disciplinary proceedings.”

Back to Top
April 13, 2009 | 10:14am
Facebook
|
Twitter
|
Digg
|
|
Emails
|
print
Comments ()

ElLamer

good piece. I hope Palin fades into oblivion politically.

|
|
Reply
|
11:00 am, Apr 13, 2009

kris52339

Oh, no, please not that. I live for Palin du Jour. My dream come true is that Karl Rove's Republican party fractures into little bitty parts and that Palin is on Fox News every day preaching to her little bitty part.

|
|
Reply
|
11:01 am, Apr 14, 2009

Ritarita

I'm down
With that
kris.
I'd pay to watch.

|
10:08 am, Apr 15, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
12:22 am, Apr 16, 2009

mbreau

Agreed.

|
|
Reply
11:36 am, Apr 14, 2009

BeeradG

I hope she never goes away. She is the absolute surest way for the democrats to stay in control.

|
|
Reply
|
1:18 pm, Apr 14, 2009

ElLamer

The same people that sponsor tools like Palin will start spreading their money to the dems too. I would like to see the GOP get its act together and for even a few third parties to emerge. I think we need to clean house of all corrupt and idiot politicians, no matter what political affiliation.

|
5:06 pm, Apr 14, 2009

jackee

A quick bit of research about this Ms. Burton demonstrates that she's a nutjob. That side of the story has been neglected by Mr. Blumenthal. Poor one-sided story.

|
|
Reply
|
11:16 am, Apr 13, 2009

janet1003mn

Interesting. You Google Leah Burton, crib the keyword, NUTJOB, from the first entry from the -- wait for it -- conservatives4palin.com site, and call Mr. Blumenthal's article one-sided. He never purported to be writing about Leah Burton. This is, in fact, and editorial, and Mr. Blumenthal is under no obligation to be "fair and balanced." The article is, in fact, about Mr. W.A.R.

If you've got some facts from credible sources about Leah Burton, please site them so the rest of us might be enlightened.

P.S. sites in the tank for Palin don't count as credible. Dig harder.

|
|
Reply
7:53 pm, Apr 13, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
|
11:35 pm, Apr 13, 2009

LoriAnn

the way I look at it if men like this (WAR) and female hypocrits would keep their mouths shut, women like me wouldnt have to claw and beg for reproductive and basic human rights. Palin was chosen strickly for her looks and on a faux personna... no one bothered to dig a little into the muck and they thought no one else would either!!

|
3:46 pm, Apr 16, 2009

Slim45

This guy represents the core of the Republican party. Palin is not necessarily ashamed of her association him. Just revisit the Presidential campaign. She sounded just like this character.

|
|
Reply
11:35 am, Apr 13, 2009

KateTheGreat

Ugh, it terrifies me to think about this woman and her ilk in any positions of authority...can you imagine the kind of cabinet she'd choose? Eeeeeekkk!

|
|
Reply
|
12:10 pm, Apr 13, 2009

AndreainNY

This is exactly the response all this press about Palin is supposed to achieve.

Scare people with Palin. Then Obama's spending won't look so bad in comparison.

|
|
Reply
|
10:10 pm, Apr 13, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
11:40 pm, Apr 13, 2009

anonniemuss

This is exactly the sort of paranoid and missing-the-point-completely delusional nonsense I would expect from a Palin supporter. You seem tohave this idea that her values and her choices can't possibly be newsworthy in their own right, and that the media is trying to make a story out of nothing. What happened to your mind that you cannot see that this woman is an extremist in so many ways? And that the fact that she scares people on her own is why she is in the media? She has extremist contempt for other women and for every aspect of womens' rights; she is married to an extremist who belonged to an organization calling for Alaska to secede from the U.S.; she has lied about every aspect of her life, right down to the mundane question of which newspapers she reads ("all of them"!) . . . I could go on and on but the fact is that despite all this, she *still* intends to go on to have a political career, and you think that media ought to let her go about grasping for one and not ever mention what values are and what sort of policies she supports? Also, it's not as if Obama's spending is going to disappear from the media if they choose to cover this as well. There is room for more than one story each day, in case you haven't noticed.

|
9:16 am, Apr 14, 2009

mbreau

I don't think that one has to like EITHER Palin OR Obama - His spending should be closely watched - but Palin is really ... well. too much.

|
11:38 am, Apr 14, 2009

KimPhil

Your guys ran the economy into the ditch and you're complaining about the tow-truck. Palin is scary all by herself.

|
11:39 am, Apr 14, 2009

Joanne38

We all will be wishing we had Sarah Palin over Obama before this year is over. I would rather have her kind of cabinet than what Obama has come up with any day. They couldn't be worse than the crooks Obama has put in place to damage this country. Do you liberal nuts not see what is going on around you. Banks have gone under because of what Obama, Franks, Dodds, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, and the rest have done. The unions who thought these Democrats were going to save them are getting their vote now laughed at. They can now expect lower pay, less benefits, and no retirements. Everything is going up, more and higher taxes are here already, jobs are shutting down left and right, and gas will now skyrocket to enormous proportions. Everyone will be wishing they hadn't fallen for Obama and his con game before it is over.

|
|
Reply
|
10:13 am, Apr 14, 2009

misha1000

You mean like invading a country because they were stockpiling weapons, had a nuclear bomb program, and were involved with 9/11?

How many are coming back from Iraq missing eyes, limbs, third degree burns, and psychiatric cases - all for Bush and Cheney's lies? I have news for you: we are in Iraq because of oil and Halliburton. Idi Amin was 100x worse. Ford did not send in the marines because there wasn't any oil.

The financial crisis started when Bush was in office. Gas hit record prices when Bush was in office. The higher oil went, the wealthier the Bush family got. Read a little more, and listen to wingnut radio less.

Bush and Cheney are the ones running a con game. And I detest Palin. I detest all evangelicals. You show me an evangelical, and I'll show you an ignorant bigot.

|
10:52 am, Apr 14, 2009

snapdragon

"banks have gone under because of what Obama...and the rest have done"

I hope you understand this has NOTHING to do with who is in the whitehouse, the same recession would be here if Palin was in Obamas place. Linking the financial crisis to someone who just got into office is absurd. This thing was YEARS in the making. Get your facts straight. Go listen to NPR's Planet Money Podcast to understand why we are in this mess. Then come back and try to blame it on the administration.

|
10:54 am, Apr 14, 2009

ElLamer

Ok what taxes have already gone up? can you prove that? My taxes and everyone I knows taxes are going down in future but nothing has changed yet.

Of the 13 banks that have gone under to date which one was Obamas fault in your opinion? What brings you to beleave that the problems were not inherited?

What have Obama, Franks, Dodds, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, and the rest done exactly, proveably, stuff that actually happened?

Things going on around us only include real things (as opposed to things going on exclusively in our minds).

Give me something to research and I will do it, I can't research allogations with no substance.

|
10:56 am, Apr 14, 2009

Feddupwichu

Joanne dear,

I've read a few of your posts and you remind me of many grandparents who have moved to Florida, or Arizona or elsewhere to retirement communities. Many of these communities become targets for right-wing propaganda through daily papers and such. Since your posts read like the baseless, lying right-wing propaganda that is passed around these communities, I thought I should help you by telling you that you have been taken advantage of, lied to and now they've got you passing on their lies! Be careful Joanne, next they'll be suggesting medications you don't need, selling you things over the phone, and having you send money to Nigeria!!

We're all concerned for you Joanne38!! Escape!!

Sometimes Joanne, I know this might be shocking, they will write things to exploit racism with words like socialsm, communism, European and worse. They'll say they are "real Americans", "patriots" or "conservatives" so you'll believe they are good people. If they're good people, why would they lie to you??? But they have Joanne, they really have!!!!!

|
11:09 am, Apr 14, 2009

rhiannonet

you can't be serious? how can you blame obama for a situation that was created before he and the democrats came into power?

|
1:14 pm, Apr 14, 2009

american3

Sarah Palin is extremely stupid, she never seems to say the right think. Has no knownledge of anything political or economical, how she became Governor of Alaska is mind-bogaling. The people of Alaska cannot wait to get rid of her. She is making the Democrats look wonderful, they love her. Joanne38 I'm sure agree's with Sarah , that the fundermental's to the ecomony were good and that the weapon's of mass distruction are visible from Sarah's window. With Joe the plumber at one window and Sarah and Mccain on the other windows, the liberal nuts need not worry. Saved at Last

|
4:54 pm, Apr 14, 2009

bobzaguy

"Banks have gone under because of what Obama, Franks, Dodds, Pelosi, Reid, Schumer, and the rest have done."

Seems to me that the banks went under before the November elections and Dubya and his little Paulson boychic dumped 7 hundred billion buckaroos in their pockets without so much as an oversight group to watch the spending. Paulson gave $10 billion to his Goldman Sachs company and then AIG sent another $12 billion their way as well. Party on with the Republicans, it's not their money.

|
1:28 pm, Apr 15, 2009

LoriAnn

only because of the men who have surrounded her in her career... she could be easily molded and used to suit their purposes and she just ate it up cause money was involved.....there is a word for that.....political prostitution!!

|
|
Reply
3:48 pm, Apr 16, 2009

VenusMuse

Just another attempt to smear Palin.

Let's not forget the unethical members of Obama camp, most of which somehow, don't have to be accountable to pay taxes, interest and penalties.

You just can't make this stuff up!

|
|
Reply
|
12:13 pm, Apr 13, 2009

republikant

If you can't make this stuff up, then why are you doing so?

But you are totally right with your arguments of moral equivalency, advocating spousal rape, defending the kkk, and denigrating homosexuals = not paying the correct amount of taxes on a work car.

|
|
Reply
1:07 pm, Apr 13, 2009

reecharded

Well both cases raise the same question: Are they qualified for the post they're being considered?

Geitner and some of the others with unpaid taxes ultimately did pay their taxes along with applicable penalties, but did that make them unqualified for the Cabinet? Most people agree it does not.

However, I see it hard to defend someone who defended the KKK and spewed ignorant speech about spousal rape and homosexuals. He supports the right to form anti-government militias??? THAT sure makes him unqualified.

|
|
Reply
3:23 pm, Apr 13, 2009

ElLamer

I assume this http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheat-sheet/item/palins-tax-problem/palintolog y/ is just a smear on Palin as well *g* I wonder if she will pay her taxes interest and penalties *g*

|
|
Reply
10:59 am, Apr 14, 2009

yweston

VenusMuse
Get a grip!! Palin just paid $17,000 in back taxes and she had to pay Alaska back for expenses she claimed while staying in her home. She also owes $500,000 in legal fees for TrooperGate and she set up a fund to help pay her fees. She signed a six figure book deal, but wants supporters to pay her legal fees.
Recently her ex-to-be-son in law's mother was arrested for dealing drugs and her husbands sister was arrested for burglary with a small child in "tow". And.....you want to talk about Obama. Please!!!

|
|
Reply
|
1:41 pm, Apr 14, 2009

Emmorie

AMEN! Palin is not ready for "prime" time. Yes, she is a governor of a state; popoulation 600,000. What is that, one-fifth the size of Chicago? She lost alot of women with the claim no abortion even if her child was raped. If Republicans want such a small government, why do they feel the need to tell us what to do with our bodies?

|
10:20 am, Apr 15, 2009

kennethetucker

no... it's NOT just another attempt to smear Palin, it's an accurate reporting of the record of W.A.R., placed in context to his nomination as AK AG.

facts are facts, history is history, the record is the record and, of course to kool aid drinking loons such as yourself, we KNOW reading (must less comprehending) isn't your 'thing' so... i guess we're just gonna have to agree to disagree here, and we'll see you 'wild-eyed' pistol wavers' at the polls in '12.

|
|
Reply
10:18 pm, Apr 14, 2009

Spasticula

I'm so grateful that after 30 years of incorrigible conservative idiocy that their boundless foolishness is finally coming home to roost. The last 3 months of GOP stupidity couldn't come at a better time. In what should be a rebuilding period, every witless instinct in their arsenal pushes them deeper in the toilet. Michael Steele, Jindal, tea-bagging, Sarah, Joe... don't change a thing GOP! The nation has finally come to its senses & I'm loving it.

|
|
Reply
|
12:17 pm, Apr 13, 2009

LitaMarieH

I know!! I hope Rush, Palin and all these crazies only gain publicity. The nation is in stitches watching the far-right throw tantrum after tantrum, and it only drives them farther into their political black hole. It's sad that the republican party is becoming less and less respected as a legit alternate way of viewing things...but they really don't seem to mind, for the most part.

Couldn't agree with you more, Spasticula!

|
|
Reply
4:19 pm, Apr 13, 2009

SteveStephens

one, of course, must remember the mission statement of Karl Rove and George Bush and the Repubs.propagated during their party meeting and assemblies during the last eight years. It wasn't , to help the middle class , or improve our education system. the mission statement of the Republican Party, their main goal of the last eight years was to consolidate power for generations to come, and they acheived that.........only they did it for the Democrats.

|
|
Reply
1:10 am, Apr 14, 2009

KimPhil

It would be completely comical if I didn't live in a state surrounded by people who think she's right. But, keep 'em comin' Sarah...maybe the number of nutjobs who agree with you will get smaller.

|
|
Reply
11:43 am, Apr 14, 2009

zeroyear27

Can anything go right for her? She is relentless after seeking the presidency in 2012 after her thoughtless answers to nearly every question (and you can't forget the gaffes, of course) of every major interview. But it will be funny to see her in the headlines in 2012 again!

|
|
Reply
|
12:23 pm, Apr 13, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
11:45 pm, Apr 13, 2009

SteveStephens

I simply cannot wait.

|
|
Reply
1:11 am, Apr 14, 2009

Feddupwichu

When baffoons politically succeed (including being on a Presidential ticket), we tell the rest of the world that we don't know how to function as a democracy. How could someone so horrible get so far?

Democracy is dangerous when a country does not invest in and value education. If we do not improve our education system, we won't be talking about race in politics, but ignorant in politics. As soon as the stupid people outnumber us, every state will have Sarah Palins and WARs in office.

Then say it's funny.

|
|
Reply
10:31 am, Apr 14, 2009

This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.

|
|
Reply
12:34 am, Apr 16, 2009

cluesearch

I'm sorry, were we supposed to be surprised by this pick? Another glaring example yet again, why we must thank John McCain for picking Ole Sarah as his running mate--he sealed his reckless opportunism at the feet of her very sexy Manolo Blahnicks. Proof also that Sarah is as crazy as all of her appointees.

|
|
Reply
12:27 pm, Apr 13, 2009

pricklypear

Max, the muckraker.

Neh, it's a livin'.

|
|
Reply
|
12:33 pm, Apr 13, 2009

This user is no longer registered.

n--Y--wanting
|
|
Reply
8:38 pm, Apr 13, 2009

Hawnzz

This author has a very decided political slant. (I always take that into account.) I read both sets of the political spectrum, regardless.

However, Mr. Ross in a way reminds me of the Bill Clinton sex scandals. Here is why... I can understand that a woman could want to get her 15 minutes of fame and use a famous figure to do it. But when these sex scandals start happening on a 3 month basis... it's like come ON! Someone weld his zipper shut.

However, there is too much evidence that the views of Mr. Ross are too warped for any public service. In fact they are at odds with many of the principles the Republic was founded. I hope this becomes evident and that he is not appointed.

There are so many Republicans I've seen, heck... watch This Week... on ABC with George Stephanophoulos on any given Sunday morning, that are better suited to high political office. Palin is way out of her league and is not (yes I'm going to say it) smart enough to handle the job. Every time I've seen her speak I just cringe. I can't handle another 8 years like the last. I'm tired of the Republicans scrounging the bottom of their talent pool when they have so many/better options.

|
|
Reply
|
12:38 pm, Apr 13, 2009

missbike

I agree, but- so what if Bill fooled around? Americans are so naive thinking high powered pols wouldn't do that! The rest of the world considers peoples private lives private, and so have a huge pool of actual talent to draw from. Here we absolutely have to have Jesus Christ himself, but with a perfect wife and 2.4 kids and a record unblemished by anything. And then we howl when they're human. That Edwards fellow is wasted talent because we want our government officials to act like few of us do. I doubt his wife cared about the mistress- by 50 we often find it a relief.

The rest of the world doesn't care about peoples private lives, but can they do the job well? Maybe the Rebuplicans could find an intelligent, honest leader with no allusions to dictatorship if we didn't get hysterical about some chickie he slept with five years ago. You want Jindal? I think not! Or this crazy idiot from the wilds of Alaska?

Although even France wouldn't put up with Mr W.A.R. What a psycho!

|
|
Reply
7:54 am, Apr 14, 2009

Redhead5050

Absolute slime...Palin is such a sleaze. Her ideas are repugnant to all thinking Americans as are her choices in representatives. This will leave little to doubt as to why she will never lead in any large way.

|
|
Reply
12:44 pm, Apr 13, 2009

Ritarita



God
I hope
Sarah Palin runs
In 2012

She can
Bring
Thunderdome
Down to
The lower
48.

|
|
Reply
12:52 pm, Apr 13, 2009

BlakewilliamsNYC

@VenusMuse

Sure the Obama camp has had tax issues - but its seems like an unlikely intelligent statement made by you when comparing someone that targets gays, and apparently claims its ok to rape your wife.

How does that make sense to you? I love conservative rebuttals because they are always the same. Obama's people didn't pay taxes. He's a muslim. This country is turning to socialism (and so what. I lived in canada for 5 years - free health care, oh damn).

Shut up. He won. We'll be better off.

|
|
Reply
|
1:05 pm, Apr 13, 2009

ElLamer

the funniest thing is that Palin also has tax problems

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheat-sheet/item/palins-tax-problem/palinto logy/

mega lol

|
|
Reply
11:00 am, Apr 14, 2009

socialworklady

What do you know - Palin pals around with racist, sexist scum balls. Go figure :)

|
|
Reply
1:36 pm, Apr 13, 2009

amerigo

Calling a person who works on behalf of victims of domestic violence and on children's issues (a voiceless multitude) a "fringe nutcase" hardly shows the objectivity and concern a future attorney general of Alaska should have, especially when AK rates one of the highest in the nation for domestic violence.

Palin has made another poor choice, in my opinion.

The state legislature is scheduled to make a decision on Ross' appointment April 16.



|
|
Reply
1:40 pm, Apr 13, 2009
Leave a comment

Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.

View Comments

Palin's New Disaster

by Max Blumenthal

Info
RSS
Max  Blumenthal
Emails
|
print
Single Page
|
text
-
+
Facebook
 | 
Twitter
 | 
Digg
 |