Blogs and Stories
Former Iran Hostage: This Isn't a Revolution
AP Photo
Blindfolded, bound hands, one from the sixty hostages held at the American Embassy, here, is shown to the crowd by Iranian students, on Nov. 8, 1979 in Tehran, Iran. Students stormed the embassy Sunday, Nov. 4, taking staff hostage and asking for the deportation of the Shah of Iran from the United States.
Moorhead Kennedy was taken hostage in Iran in 1979 and watched the government crumble. He tells The Daily Beast’s Benjamin Sarlin about why regime change is unlikely this time around.
Plus, read more insight on Iran's election from other Daily Beast writers.
Are we witnessing the second Iranian revolution? One American diplomat who was taken hostage during the last revolution tells The Daily Beast he thinks the Ahmadinejad government will hold firm.
Images of thousands of young Iranians demonstrating in support of opposition leader Mir Hossein Mousavi have drawn comparisons to the protests that eventually unseated the shah in January 1979 and put the current theocratic government in place. Some observers, like The Huffington Post's Sam Stein, have gone so far as to suggest that the current movement could overthrow the Islamic government in similar fashion, and columnists like The New York Times' Roger Cohen have described the country as "close to the brink."
“It’s very counterproductive to interfere in someone else’s election,” Moorhead Kennedy Jr. said. “I think the best thing the U.S. can do is shut up.”
Moorhead Kennedy Jr. has a different take. Kennedy was the acting head of the United States Embassy's economic section when it was overrun by student protesters in 1979, setting off a 444-day standoff as the U.S. sought to secure their release. In an exclusive interview, he told The Daily Beast that the government appears far stronger in its position than it did 30 years ago, when the shah was unable to prevent protesters from putting in place a provisional revolutionary government that, in turn, was too weak to prevent hardliners from taking over the country.
"The difference is when we were taken over as hostages, the provisional government had completely lost control, it was anarchy," Kennedy said. "At this point, although there was a strong reaction on the part of the Mousavi crowd to the reelection of the president, it seems the government has things under control. It looks to me from my reading that it will stay that way."
Kennedy has spent the last three decades since his release advocating increased understanding between the Middle East and America in order to diffuse tensions between the two regions. He said that while the government may have tampered with the election, it was unlikely that it could have done so on a scale large enough to deny victory to Mousavi, who Kennedy said lacked sufficient support outside of Tehran to win under any circumstances.
"I think there's a growing opposition, it sounds like, in Tehran among the better educated people, but throughout the country it looks like [Mahmoud] Ahmadinejad has things pretty well the way he wants it," Kennedy said.
The best U.S. response to the election crisis, according to Kennedy, is to stay removed from the conflict until the dust settles and then attempt to negotiate with whichever regime emerges. He praised Joe Biden's reaction to the protesters Sunday on NBC's Meet the Press, in which the vice president cast doubt on the election results but shied away from a more pronounced condemnation.
"It's very counterproductive to interfere in someone else's election," Kennedy said. "I think the best thing the U.S. can do is shut up."
While he doubts that Iran can be stopped from eventually producing nuclear weapons, he hopes that shrewd, quiet, diplomacy could help secure their cooperation in bolstering the fledgling Iraqi and Afghani governments and perhaps persuade the government to back off from its rigid anti-Semitic and anti-Israel stance.
Benjamin Sarlin is a reporter for The Daily Beast. He previously covered New York City politics for The New York Sun and has worked for talkingpointsmemo.com.










Make no mistake about it. This time around, there will be a real revolution regardless of how strong the enemy of the true Iranian people ( The regime itself ) may be. It won't be too long now before the mullahs regime is toppled .
i disagree. the iranians are demonstrating against a figurehead. they're not rising against the Supreme Leader. it's somewhat ridiculous that they're upset to learn they don't live in a democracy -- they never were! the Shah just goes by a different name, now.
How absolutely correct is Mr. Kennedy's take on the present situation in Iran. About the only commonality between the "Iranian hostage" Iran and the present one is that of civil unrest. But the root causes of each period of unrest are very different.
And though his detractors will disagree with this indelicately-put statement, Barack Obama knows when to shut the f*ck up. Prudent silence can accomplish as much, or more, than foolish chest thumping. Unless the U.S. is fully prepared to put their poor, over-extended military in yet another abyss of conflict, there is ABSOLUTELY nothing to be gained by opining/ chest-beating/ lecturing about democracy/revolution/human rights in the wake of Iranian elections. Such is the "realpolitik" default position we have to take after 8 years' worth of a rogue "cowboy" President who mired us fighting on two fronts--with no end in sight.
Thank you, Mr. Kennedy.
I know Americans wouldn't like it if a jingoistic cowboy clown cheerleader was elected President and the Russian, Chinese, French, German, Brazilian, Mexican and Canadian press was urging Americans to the streets to protest the election results.
A certain segment of Americans would love it.
This user is no longer registered.
Sorry, but the nuke threat is directed at the people of Iran and nobody else. Israel is well prepared to defend itself.
Very insightful. It is what it is in Iran and it didn't matter who was elected. Mousavi may have tuned down the childish rhetoric, but the country is run by the Khamenei and things won't be changing soon.
i doubt that the votes were counted at all in the Iranian election, but the US has not even had an embassy in Iran for 30 years, and we have no real influence there over anything that is happening. We Americans are not even allowed to visit there on tourist visas, which is the law in the United States.
Therefore, we should keep out of it, take care of our problems at home, and let the Iranians work out their own destiny. We have no choice anyway.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.
Please log in to leave comments.