Blogs and Stories
The Wrong Case
AP Photo
If Obama is going to wade into the national dialogue on race and criminal justice, he should forget about Skip Gates.
Read other takes on Gates' arrest from Daily Beast writers.
Hurray! Henry Louis Gates, a black Harvard professor, intends to have a beer this week with Sgt. James Crowley, the white police officer who arrested him. As racially fraught conflicts go, happier endings are rare. The Cellar is one Cambridge, Massachusetts. bar where a professor and a police officer might meet for drinks on neutral territory: "You will not find a better $10 burger and fries," Yelp.com notes.
Six months into his tenure, President Obama offered his most prominent statement on race and criminal justice on behalf of a wealthy Ivy League buddy.
Too bad these newsmakers plan to hoist suds at the White House instead. In an impromptu press conference last week, President Obama publicized the invite, noting that "some say" he shouldn't comment on local matters, but that race and controversial policing are "part of my portfolio."
To be fair, it's been a century since Theodore Roosevelt dubbed the presidency a "bully pulpit." Oval Office occupants routinely speak on matters beyond their strict constitutional purview. What vexes is that a leader bound to address racial profiling, "stupid" arrests, and a flawed criminal justice system chose a case so undeserving of presidential comment. Presume that Prof. Gates was unjustly taken into custody. Is anyone in America better protected against wrongful prosecution than a tenured Harvard professor of any color?
"You have no idea who you're messing with," Gates reportedly said before being cuffed. He understood what it means to be Ivy in America. His inconsequential arrest provoked breathless national coverage, dominating several news cycles. Though no charges were filed, the White House press corps queried the president!
Thus six months into his tenure, President Obama offered his most prominent statement on race and criminal justice on behalf of a wealthy Ivy League buddy. Were that all, the president might have avoided burnishing his reputation for elitism. Last week, I defended him against that charge, noting that he was asked about the Gates incident. Notably "stupid" is his deliberately prolonging the controversy—beyond even a second press conference—for a round of beers and several more news cycles.
President Obama deems this "a teachable moment." In fact, Glenn Loury is correct when he notes that "the contretemps shed no relevant light on the plight of the millions of black men on society’s margins who bear the brunt of police scrutiny." Innocents among them remain jailed and without any prominent advocate in American politics. How politically conservative is a president who defends only esteemed, nationally known professors? Change on this issue requires advocacy in cases where misconduct by police or prosecutors gravely wrongs those without power.
There are literally hundreds of cases where innocent, disproportionally black prisoners would benefit from a presidential mention, never mind two press conferences and a happy hour. Admittedly, most would prove more politically fraught than defending an elderly Ivory Tower star: wrongly arrest and release a black man who happens to be a Harvard professor and the national press corps writes searching pieces on race in America; wrongly imprison for years on end a black man who happens to be working class and without celebrity, and the national press corps continues to mostly ignore a criminal justice system that routinely convicts innocent people.







menckenlite
A rational account of events, though there are better choices of bars in Cambridge. Friedersdorf omits the fact that Gates is a multi millionaire like Obama and the black Harvard lawyer Governor of MA who joined the proud black lesbian single mother Mayor of Cambridge who said she will make this "go away." The charge was filed but was dropped by the weak-kneed DA due to pressure from the spineless politicians and the academics. Gates exploits police abuses of poor blacks and poor whites like many upper class multi millionaire black professors at Harvard. Obama, Friedersdorf and the MA politicians remain silent about 19 homicides of white women and white men by FBI informants in Boston. A trial for damages by relatives of the murdered is in progress but you'd hardly know that from the mindless journalists in the USA. The same suspects are silent regarding a Boston FBI frame-up of four white men for murder. Two died in prison and two were released after 30 years. The US AG appeals the $101 million award in that case. Is their race a reason why their abuses were ignored? This is where I depart from the race mongers. Abuse of power does not know any color. Only journalists and professors do. Moreover when Gov. Palin spoke about a state trooper who threatened her family, journalists attacked her. But when Obama, the MA Governor and the Cambridge Mayor abused their power for their "friend" this is no problem? That is racial bias too. But ignored by the limousine liberals.
Autopilot
Mencken you're not. And "lite" is right.
egbauer
Two main comments here:
(1) Perfect at the expense of the good anyone? It is simply not sound to argue against addressing one wrongdoing because another, greater wrongdoing deserves the attention. You are certainly right; but it's an impractical, wrongheaded way to look at the world, since all it ever accomplishes is to belittle or shut down worthy efforts.
(2) The thing that really amazes me about this story is that even once all the facts were on the table, people have continued to glom onto the race issue when we have, clear as day, a town-and-gown issue. Boston as a whole (Cambridge being a part of the larger problem) is hugely divided; with ~50% of the population working in academia, the intellectual-vs.-working-man rivalry is unprecedented in its scale. There is very little mixing between the intellectual and anti-intellectual population, and a lot of mutual resentment and misunderstanding.
If there is a problem here involving elitism - and anti-elitism - try addressing it thoughtfully. It's the main event, and it deserves the attention.
chiaboy
he didn't wade into this issue. the media asked him about it.
the later decision he did make were a result of the dust up, but be honest. he didn't make a choice to take this issue on. it was asked in a Q/A session.
the real complaint (which you have seeds of something important in your piece) should be why does the media care so little unless it's a IV educated famous dude?
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.