Blogs and Stories
How to Live Forever
Bad news for the gleeful: Research suggests cheery people die younger. As the world’s oldest man is laid to rest today, Casey Schwartz on which personality types actually live longest.
Henry Allingham’s explanation for his amazing longevity was "cigarettes, whisky and wild, wild women.” Which doesn’t mean you should run out and buy a fifth of Jack Daniel’s just yet.
The 113-year-old World War I vet, believed to be the world’s oldest man, died on July 18 and will be buried today in Brighton, England. His obituaries describe the incredible sweep of his life: he breathed the air of three centuries, outlived his wife by 40 years, and flew on “motorized kites” made of linen and wire in battle against the German army.
The optimist’s worldview might capsize him in the face of life’s more difficult moments—optimists just don’t account for the usual grim possibilities.
Whenever someone lives as long as Allingham did, others are eager to learn his secret. Was it Allingham’s apparent freewheeling lifestyle that helped propel him to 113? It doesn’t appear so. According to researchers, it was probably the less adventurous side of his personality. Either that, or dumb luck.
Nowadays, the word personality has a more or less official definition in scientific circles, and researchers are fairly certain that particular personality traits can be directly linked to longevity. Psychologists use what is known as the “Big 5,” a paradigm designed to encapsulate any individual personality by ranking it on five different dimensions: agreeableness, openness, extroversion, conscientiousness and neuroticism. In theory, everyone falls somewhere on the spectrum of each of these traits.
Slowly but surely, there is a consensus emerging among researchers that two of these traits are consistently linked to how long we live. The first is conscientiousness, which entails a disposition to be diligent, organized, and responsible. The trait is measured according to the way in which a person responds to such statements as “I am exacting in my work,” or “I like order.”
In 1993, Howard Friedman, a professor of psychology at the University of California, took over an enormous longitudinal study called the Terman Life Cycle Study that consisted of approximately 1,000 subjects. Psychologists first assessed the personalities of these subjects in the 1920s. Then, some 60 years later, Friedman started tracking the surviving members of the group to figure out which “types” were still going strong.
Translating the results of the old personality tests into contemporary categories, he found that a disproportionate number of conscientious subjects were still alive in the 1980s. These findings make perfect sense—people who are more diligent and exacting in their daily lives can be expected to avoid certain pitfalls. Still, the findings were the first to establish a link between a stable childhood personality trait and survival decades into the future.
Somewhat less obvious were findings concerning the relationship between neuroticism and longevity. Neuroticism, in the context of these studies, is defined as a tendency to experience negative emotions, from anger to fear to run-of-the-mill anxiety.







ThinkAgain
Expect the best but be prepared for the worst.
UnderTheHedgeWeGo
What is the meaning "Dr. Friedman's-who was working in California, of all places"? Did we here in the "Golden State" leave our collective zippers down? Is there something you haven't been telling us?
JohnnyAces
I'm screwed.
crngndmhm
Expect the worst hope for the best
deegeezee
interesting article.
but casey, get a new headshot that doesn't look like a facebook party pic after you cropped out your ex.
exploora
I guess preparing for an early grave makes you too busy to die.
Artist50
Lord, I don't want to live too long! I come from a long line of crazy old women. They live into their 90's and they lose their minds. I can feel mine slipping already.
TREESKE
I'm glad not to be the only one to feel this way!
TREESKE
Also, you made my day. Gave me a good laugh!
namedujour
Oh God, me too. Furthermore, my mother once said to me, "Never get old." Watching her hitting that cab driver with her cane, it seemed like good advice.
This comment has been removed by The Daily Beast's editors.
mredder4
So I can look forward to more years of miserable life? That's almost enough to make me want to be cheerful out of self-spite.
kcaldaba
The trouble with being an optimist is that you're never pleasantly surprised.
shoabear
Good article.
I agree with deegeezee though about the head shot. It doesn't look appropriate. I wasn't gonna say anything but it was the first thing I noticed. It def looks like a facebook party shot or somethin. Where's your cosmo?
Bandersnatch
I find it interesting that Friedman's explanation of why cheerful people die younger is somewhat critical of the cheerful- they are "illusory optimists" who think they can avoid life's harsh realities, and thus do not foresee problems or fall apart altogether when those realities present themselves. There's an inherent value judgment here that isn't being addressed- the notion that it is better or even more admirable to live a long, unhappy life than a shorter, cheerier one, and that if cheerful people die younger, it must be because they are making some kind of mistake.
This assumption ignores the underlying matter that regardless of when cheerful people die, they presumably lead happier lives than the neurotics who outlive them. Perhaps the question shouldn't be what cheerful people are doing wrong that's making them die younger, but rather what neurotic people are doing wrong that is making them lead long, unhappy lives rather than slightly shorter, much happier ones.
The point about smoking and drink at the end of the article is particularly illustrative. Friedman characterizes such vices among the cheerful as evidence of "illusory optimism." But why does he assume that cheerful people believe they will avoid the consequences of smoking and drinking? Perhaps they simply accept of the risks, and prefer whatever benefit they get from smoking and drinking to the benefit they would get from avoiding such activities. I don't get why this behavior is being characterized as a product of self deception rather than rational decision making, when either interpretation is equally supportable.
Heck, maybe cheery people don't live as long because they just don't fear death as much as neurotic people. Given that we all die anyway, I don't see why we should value necessarily longevity over quality of life. Which is probably why I'm a cheerful smoker and drinker, and totally alright with checking out a bit earlier than some neurotic hypochondriac who clings to life at all costs without ever doing much to make it particularly worth living.
Thank you.
As a first time user, your comment has been submitted for review. It can take anywhere from a few hours to a day or two for your comment to be reviewed, depending on the time of week and the volume of comments we receive.