1. UH-OH

    Santorum Favors Profiling Muslims

    WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 22:  Republican presidential candidates (L-R) Rick Santorum, Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), Texas Gov. Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN), and Jon Huntsman are introduced prior to a debate at Constitution Hall November 22, 2011 in Washington, DC. The debate, hosted by CNN and in partnership with the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute, was expected to focus primarily on national security, foreign policy and the economy.  (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

    Win McNamee / Getty Images

    Rick Santorum suggests "profiling" as a better security screening method than TSA patdowns, and that those who are "most likely to be committing crimes" should be screened. Yes, he says, that means Muslims. Ron Paul has a solid rebuttal: what about Timothy McVeigh? Herman Cain agrees that TSA patdowns are insufficient and outlines a plan for "targeted identification." Moderator Wolf Blitzer pushes Cain to elaborate and say whether Muslims and other "likely suspects" should be screened more often than, say, white Christians. Cain gets a little hot under the collar, calling Wolf "Blitz" and accusing him of "oversimplifying" his statement.

    Read it at The Dish