Amy Coney Barrett Basically Thinks Women Are Incubators
Balls & Strikes Editor-in-Chief Jay Willis joins Molly Jong-Fast to talk about the conservative justices and some of the wild things they’ve said about abortion rights.
Photo Illustration by The Daily Beast/Getty
Balls & Strikes Editor-in-Chief Jay Willis wants to set the record straight: the Supreme Court’s conservative makeup is nothing new. Talking to host Molly Jong-Fast on this bonus episode of The New Abnormal, Willis says the high court has been a conservative institution since the late 1960s.
“There’s sort of this popular conception of the court is fairly balanced... for decades, there was a liberal wing and a conservative wing and then a so-called swing justice,” he explains.
“It was Sandra Day O’Connor then it was Anthony Kennedy, but Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy were both Republican appointees, both conservatives. So at all times the court has leaned conservative. And then obviously since Anthony Kennedy was replaced with your good friend and mine, Brett Kavanaugh, that entire model has been out the window.”
Willis was breaking down the court’s political leanings because the future of Roe v. Wade hangs in the balance. SCOTUS heard arguments this week in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, a case that may decide if a state is entitled to block women from getting abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy. And quite frankly, pro-rights people are scared.
Did you know you can listen to The New Abnormal bonus episodes in your member dashboard or a podcast app? Click here to get set up and sign up for new episode email alerts here.
Willis explains why they have good reason to be. “It’s certainly the most conservative Supreme court since the Great Depression,” he says.
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
He notes that Roberts compared American abortion access to North Korea’s, suggesting it’s too lax, and Kavanaugh waxed poetic about other times the court had overturned it’s own precedents, apparently missing the point that those cases actually expanded people’s rights.
Amy Coney Barrett stated that she basically thinks adoption access should be enough to block women’s rights. So what do all these things have in common? Well, Willis tells Molly that these judges on the right seem to think they really are upholding justice.
“They don’t think this is like an abdication of their judicial responsibility in their movement. This is like an act of tremendous courage that they’ve been building towards for decades. And it’s like a privilege for them to be able to follow through on this promise to follow through on this movement,” he says.
Barrett’s comments on the issue, in particular, were “really flippant, really shocking and [it] does not portend well for what comes next.”
Listen to The New Abnormal on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Amazon and Stitcher.
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.