CrosswordNewsletters
DAILY BEAST
ALL
  • Cheat Sheet
  • Politics
  • Crime
  • Entertainment
  • Media
  • Innovation
  • Opinion
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Scouted
  • Travel
CHEAT SHEET
    POLITICS
    • Fever Dreams
    • Biden World
    • Elections
    • Opinion
    • National Security
    • Congress
    • Pay Dirt
    • The New Abnormal
    • Right Richter
    • Trumpland
    MEDIA
    • Confider
    • Daytime Talk
    • Late-Night
    • Fox News
    U.S. NEWS
    • Identities
    • Crime
    • Race
    • LGBT
    • Extremism
    • Coronavirus
    WORLD
    • Russia
    • Europe
    • China
    • Middle East
    INNOVATION
    • Science
    TRAVEL
      ENTERTAINMENT
      • TV
      • Movies
      • Music
      • Comedy
      • Sports
      • Sex
      • TDBs Obsessed
      • Awards Shows
      • The Last Laugh
      FOOD & BEVERAGE
        CULTURE
        • Power Trip
        • Fashion
        • Books
        • Royalist
        TECH
        • Disinformation
        SCOUTED
        • Face Masks
        • Clothing
        • Technology
        • Bedroom
        • Kitchen
        • Home
        • Fitness
        • The Case For
        • I'm Looking For
        • New Kids On the Block
        COUPONS
        • Adidas Promo Codes
        • DoorDash Promo Codes
        • H&M Coupons
        • Hotwire Promo Codes
        • Wine.com Discounts
        • Vitacost Coupons
        • Spanx Promo Codes
        • StubHub Promo Codes
        Products
        NewslettersPodcastsCrosswordsSubscription
        FOLLOW US
        GOT A TIP?

        SEARCH

        HOMEPAGE
        Opinion

        Here’s Why Trump’s Fighting Words Are a High Crime

        COMMON SENSE
        opinion

        Photo Illustration by Lyne Lucien/The Daily Beast/Getty

        The First Amendment does not protect months of reckless, incendiary speech that foreseeably led to violence.

        Jay Michaelson

        Updated Feb. 13, 2021 3:35AM ET / Published Feb. 13, 2021 12:09AM ET 

        “The First Amendment must be properly applied here,” impeachment defense lawyer Michael van der Veen insisted Friday morning, saying that Trump’s “fight like hell” talk on Jan. 6 was standard political rhetoric, protected by the Constitution.

        This argument is legally wrong. And the reason is a cluster of concepts that recur in criminal and civil law: foreseeability, recklessness, and negligence.

        Together, these terms stand for the common-sense principle that if you create the conditions for something to inevitably occur, you are responsible for it. If you put a bunch of oil-soaked rags next to an open flame, you are responsible for the fire that results, even if you didn’t deliberately set it. If you get drunk and drive, you are responsible for the death you caused, and will likely be charged with murder, rather than simply manslaughter. The law recognizes this all the time.

          DAILY BEAST
          • Cheat Sheet
          • Politics
          • Crime
          • Entertainment
          • Media
          • World
          • Innovation
          • U.S. News
          • Scouted
          • Travel
          • Subscription
          • Crossword
          • Newsletters
          • Podcasts
          • About
          • Contact
          • Tips
          • Jobs
          • Advertise
          • Help
          • Privacy
          • Code of Ethics & Standards
          • Diversity
          • Terms & Conditions
          • Copyright & Trademark
          • Sitemap
          • Coupons:
          • Coupons:
          • Vistaprint Coupons
          • Samsung Promo Coupons
          • Home Depot Coupons
          • Office Depot Coupons
          • eBay Coupons
          • Ashley Furniture Promo Codes
          © 2022 The Daily Beast Company LLC