Crime & Justice

SCOTUS: Patent Office Can’t Ban Trademark for FUCT Clothing Brand

SOUND IT OUT

Justices are unanimous in overturning prohibition on “immoral or scandalous” terms, in case with implications for Washington Redskins.

RTS2J3QD_cjgavn
Kevin Lamarque/REUTERS

The Supreme Court on Monday overturned a provision of a 1946 law that banned the trademarking of “immoral or scandalous” terms. At issue was the trademark application for FUCT, a popular clothing brand. In Iancu v. Brunetti, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office had refused the application, citing the 1946 law, but the court unanimously found that to be a violation of the First Amendment. The case had been closely watched because activists had challenged the trademark of the Washington Redskins football team on basis of the same law.

Read it at The U.S. Supreme Court

Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.