Conservative activist Leonard Leo told The Washington Post on Thursday that he will not comply with a subpoena from the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is investigating undisclosed travel and gifts to Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. Leo’s attorney called the subpoena from committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-IL) “unlawful and politically motivated.” Leo himself told the Post, “I am not capitulating to his lawless support of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and the left’s dark money effort to silence and cancel political opposition.” The Democrats would have to hold a full Senate vote to enforce the subpoena and are unlikely to be successful. Durbin said he sent the subpoena because Leo has refused to cooperate with the committee’s inquiry. “Mr. Leo has played a central role in the ethics crisis plaguing the Supreme Court and, unlike the other recipients of information requests in this matter, he has done nothing but stonewall the Committee,” he said. The committee approved subpoenas for Leo and Harlan Crow back in November; Crow has not been sent one.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Senate Judiciary Committee sent a subpoena Thursday to conservative judicial activist Leonard Leo as part of a months-long inquiry into undisclosed gifts to Supreme Court justices and he promptly rejected it, calling the move “politically motivated.”
“I am not capitulating to his lawless support of Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and the left’s dark money effort to silence and cancel political opposition,” Leo said of Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), the committee’s chairman, in a statement to The Washington Post.
The committee voted along party lines on Nov. 30 to subpoena Leo and Texas billionaire Harlan Crow following reports that Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito accepted — and did not disclose — free luxury travel and gifts from Crow, Leo and conservative donor Robin Arkley II.
Crow did not receive a subpoena Thursday, his spokesman Michael Zona told The Post.
In a statement to The Post, Durbin said sending a subpoena to Leo was a necessary step.
“Since July 2023, Leonard Leo has responded to the legitimate oversight requests of the Senate Judiciary Committee with a blanket refusal to cooperate,” Durbin said. “His outright defiance left the Committee with no other choice but to move forward with compulsory process. For that reason, I have issued a subpoena to Mr. Leo.”
“Mr. Leo has played a central role in the ethics crisis plaguing the Supreme Court and, unlike the other recipients of information requests in this matter, he has done nothing but stonewall the Committee. This subpoena is a direct result of Mr. Leo’s own actions and choices,” Durbin continued.
The committee did not respond when asked for comment on why only Leo received a subpoena. And when asked why so much time elapsed between the vote and Leo’s subpoena being sent, Durbin’s office declined to expand on his original statement.
ADVERTISINGSUPREME COURT ETHICSNextSenate Dems postpone vote to subpoena allies of Justices Thomas, AlitoInfluential activist Leonard Leo helped fund media campaign lionizing Clare...Justice Thomas details jet travel, property deal with billionaireWith focus on Alito trip, Senate Democrats vow action on ethics billProPublica asked about Alito’s travel. He replied in the Wall Street Journa...Justice Thomas delays disclosures after reports of travel, property saleAnalysisClarence Thomas’s image takes a hitCrow tuition payment for Thomas relative adds to outcry over court ethicsJudicial activist directed fees to Clarence Thomas’s wife, urged ‘no mentio...AnalysisBillionaire paid tuition for Justice Clarence Thomas’s grandnephew, report ...Deep divide at Supreme Court ethics hearing, despite some GOP calls for act...Despite outrage from some, Congress reluctant to act on Supreme Court ethic...Chief Justice Roberts declines to testify on Supreme Court ethicsGorsuch property sale renews calls for Supreme Court ethics reformSen. Durbin invites Roberts to testify on Supreme Court ethics amid Thomas ...Complaints about Justice Thomas’s disclosures sent to judicial committeeClarence Thomas has for years claimed income from a defunct real estate fir...Clarence Thomas has reported receiving only two gifts since 2004Veteran U.S. judge joins calls for Supreme Court ethics codePelosi says Ginni Thomas texts show need for Supreme Court ethics code
David B. Rivkin Jr., an attorney for Leo, said in a letter addressed to Durbin and dated Thursday that Leo will not comply with the committee’s “unlawful and politically motivated subpoena.”
Share this articleNo subscription required to readShare
With Leo’s refusal, Democrats would be forced to hold a Senate vote if they wanted to seek enforcement of the subpoena in court — a nearly impossible task in a narrowly split chamber with 60 votes needed to break a filibuster.
Read it at The Washington Post
