Trumpy Judge Actually Rules Against Trump in Mar-a-Lago Case
Trump’s team argued they should be able to look over classified material in his office at Mar-a-Lago—the very place where he allegedly mishandled the docs.

Jonathan Ernst/Reuters
The Trump-appointed judge overseeing the former president’s Mar-a-Lago classified docs case in Florida just ruled against his favor, requiring Donald Trump and his lawyers to review classified evidence only in a secured location. Judge Aileen Cannon’s Wednesday ruling comes after Trump’s team pushed back on the strict security protocols and claimed they should be able to look over documents at his office in his Mar-a-Lago estate. But, prosecutors said it would be wildly ironic and irresponsible for Trump to review evidence at the very place where he allegedly mishandled the same classified documents. Instead, Trump will have to access and discuss all classified information at a sensitive compartmented information facility. Cannon’s rulings typically come out swinging in Trump’s favor, including one in August in which she shut down special counsel Jack Smith’s bid to preserve “grand jury secrecy” through sealed filings. The trial is slated to begin May 2024—right in the middle of primary campaign season for Trump.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.