Megyn Kelly Attacks Julie Swetnick, Says ‘Not All Women Tell the Truth’
The NBC host declared some women lie about sexual assault while discussing the third Kavanaugh accuser. Critics detect an ulterior motive.

Mark Wilson/Getty
NBC host Megyn Kelly fired off an incendiary series of tweets Monday night in which she not only trashed Julie Swetnick’s claims of sexual misconduct by Brett Kavanaugh, but also derided Swetnick for having not made a detailed, written contemporaneous account of Kavanaugh’s alleged abuse, as she said she did when harassed by Fox News boss Roger Ailes.
The tirade immediately sparked speculation that Kelly, who has notably failed to live up to sky-high expectations at NBC, could be eyeing a move back to a more conservative home like Fox News.
Kelly began her attack by accusing defenders of Swetnick, whom she accused of having “credibility issues,” of attempting to “shame” those who embraced “due process” and questioned her account.
Due process is not misogynistic. It happens to be the bedrock of our legal system. Ms. Swetnick was just on NBC changing her story dramatically from her sworn declaration. When an accuser has credibility issues, the A. is not to shame those who recognize it. https://t.co/FpiAigEXWn
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) October 2, 2018
When Kelly was reminded that she probably wanted to be believed when she made allegations of harassment against Ailes, who she says physically assaulted her behind the locked door of his office, she used the question as a springboard to outline how flawed Swetnick’s account is.
Nonetheless, I bet it meant a lot to YOU to be believed when it was your turn to speak up against the power head who was assaulting you.
— Kim Simons (@Kimmeebabe) October 2, 2018
ADVERTISEMENT
Swetnick claimed on NBC last night that she did contact Montgomery County, Maryland, police after the alleged incident with Kavanaugh.
Sign Up for Our Beast Digest Newsletter
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Commentators were quick to express their disbelief at Kelly’s attempts to contrast her own experience with that of Kavanaugh’s accusers. Kelly used their criticism to launch into further criticism of Swetnick before outlining how masterfully she had handled her own situation.
Jeesh Ms Kelly - Just stop. You were not in high school when you were abused. You had the benefit of harassment training and HR policies to help you build evidence. Ms Ford had no immediate support for her trauma. Her testimony is credible. Kavanaugh’s testimony reeks with lies.
— Tony Steiner (@TonyOrAnthonyS) October 2, 2018
Undaunted, Kelly continued, firing off perhaps her most incendiary tweet of all, in which she fell back on the most reliable retort of those who seek to belittle sex-crime accusers; the self-evident assertion that some women falsely claim to be the victim of sex crimes.
Not every victim will have that kind of record, which is fine, but the notion that *every* woman must be believed is absurd. Just ask the 3 Duke lax players who were falsely accused of rape by a woman who virtually all of the media believed but who made the whole thing up.
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) October 2, 2018
Kelly has, to the general amazement of those who assumed she would be a voice for scrupulous fairness, spent much of the last week defending Kavanaugh and has retweeted many messages bolstering his case and rubbishing Swetnick.
Last night’s tweet storm echoes comments made last week in which she said, while discussing Swetnick, “Most women tell the truth, not all do.”
.@MichaelAvenatti Kavanaugh denies ur client’s accusations saying he d/n/even know her. Her credibility is fair game. That’s why the AP, The Oregonian, & others are looking into it. The #MeToo mvmt doesn’t shield accusers from tough Qs. Most women tell the truth, but not all do.
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) October 1, 2018
Correction: This article previously referred to Swetnick as having accused Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her. That accusation was leveled by Deborah Ramirez. The article has been updated to reflect that.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
