R. Kelly Appealing to Supreme Court to Overturn Child Sex Convictions
The disgraced singer says his 1990s crimes should be covered by the statute of limitations.

Daniel Acker/Reuters
Lawyers for the singer R. Kelly are asking the Supreme Court to quash his various child sex convictions because they say the convictions are covered by the statute of limitations, TMZ reports. The singer, who is serving a 20-year sentence for producing child sex abuse images and inducing minors to have sex, argued at his original trial that since the offenses occurred in the 1990s, it was too late to try him. Prosecutors successfully countered that a 2003 law known as the PROTECT Act meant sex offenders could be tried at any point. TMZ says his lawyers, who have already had a federal appeal rejected by a Chicago court, are arguing that since the 2003 law had not been passed at the time of his crimes, and does not include a specific retroactive clause, the statute of limitations should still apply. The outlet reports that the high court would decide in the next few months whether to hear his appeal.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.