Scientists Are Worried About U.S. Plan to Build an ‘Outdated’ $100B Nuclear Weapon: Report
The Federation of American Scientists will release a report next week alleging a lack of “serious consideration” about whether the U.S. really needs another nuclear weapon.

Thomas Watkins/Getty
The U.S. is building a $100 billion replacement nuclear missile “based on a series of flawed assumptions,” a new think-tank report set to be released next week says. Politicians from states that will benefit financially from the project and industry lobbyists have pushed hard for the project to be greenlit, according to the Guardian. “It is becoming increasingly clear that there has not been a serious consideration of what role these cold war-era weapons are supposed to play in a post-cold war security environment,” the Federation of American Scientists’ report will say. Some critics argue the U.S. should phase out its 400 Minuteman missiles given the challenges represented by the technology. The missile will replace an aging Minuteman III missile that the FAS says would be cheaper to maintain, contrary to US Air Force assessments saying it would be less expensive to build a new one.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.