Supreme Court Blocks Alabama’s Measures to Make Voting Safer During Raging Pandemic
The voting measures were struck down by a reported five to four vote.

Reuters / Rachel Wisniewski
The U.S. Supreme Court has blocked a ruling that would have eased voting restrictions in Alabama during the raging coronavirus pandemic to make voting more safe, according to Reuters. In normal times, Alabama voters must submit a photo ID when they apply for an absentee ballot, and they need that ballot to be returned with the signature of at least two witnesses or a notary. Last month, a U.S. district court judge in Birmingham ruled that voters who are 65 or older or have a disability didn’t need to submit a photo ID, and voters with medical conditions that put them at risk of COVID-19 didn’t need to have their ballots signed by a witness. However, on Thursday, the Supreme Court issued an order blocking that ruling by a reported five to four vote after an emergency application was made to the court. The case deals with Alabama’s July 14 runoff election, which was postponed from March due to the coronavirus. President Donald Trump has repeatedly raged against mail-in ballots, claiming with no evidence that they make voting fraud more likely.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.