Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Silicon Valley Billionaire’s Beach-Access Case
Vinod Khosla attempted to gate off a beach on his property in California, causing an uproar.

Mike Blake/Reuters
The Supreme Court has declined to hear a case brought by a Silicon Valley billionaire who wanted the right to gate off an access road to a beach on his property, The Los Angeles Times reports. Co-founder of Sun Microsystems, Vinod Khosla, bought a $32.5 million, 89-acre property on California’s Martin’s Beach in 2008. The previous owners had maintained a “public bathroom, parking lot, even a general store” on the beach, with visitors having to pay a small fee to enter. Khosla claimed that the beach was running at a loss, and he eventually placed a gate and security guards on Martin’s Beach Road with “Do Not Enter” signs. Various public interest groups sued Khosla for keeping the beach to himself. Khosla claimed that the case was about “private property rights” rather than public beach access. With the Supreme Court denying his appeal, Khosla now has to abide by a California law that “declares that access to the beach is a fundamental right guaranteed to everyone.” “Beaches are public in California, and the immensely wealthy must comply with the Coastal Act just like everyone else,” Joseph Cotchett, lead attorney for the Surfrider Foundation, told the Times.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.