Supreme Court Rules Minnesota Cannot Ban Political Clothing at Polls
Rules 7-2 that state violated voters’ First Amendment rights.

BRENDAN MCDERMID/ REUTERS / Reuters
The Supreme Court ruled Thursday, in a 7-2 vote, that Minnesota cannot prohibit voters from wearing political apparel to the polls. In 2010, Andy Cilek arrived at a Minnesota polling station wearing a popular Tea Party T-shirt, reading “Don’t Tread on Me,” and a button that said “Please I.D. Me.” His apparel violated contemporaneous Minnesota law, which stated that a person could not wear a “political badge, political button, or other political insignia or about the polling place” on Election Day. After an election worker told him that he would have to remove or cover the messaging before voting, Cilek sued. The court sided with Cilek, determining that although maintaining decorum in polling places was a “permissible objective,” Minnesota’s prohibition of politically motivated clothing was too broad and vague, and therefore violated Cilek’s First Amendment rights. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts stated that “if a State wishes to set its polling places apart as areas free of partisan discord, it must employ a more discernible approach than the one offered by Minnesota here.”
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.