Supreme Court to Weigh in on ‘Trump Too Small’ Trademark
The trademark battle stems stems from Marco Rubio’s infamous 2016 jab about the size of Trump’s hands.

Jim Young/Reuters
Steve Elster, a California employment lawyer and progressive political activist, has been trying to trademark the phrase “Trump too small” to put on t-shirts since 2018. On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to consider whether or not he’ll be able to do so. The phrase stemmed from a ridiculous exchange between Donald Trump and Marco Rubio in a 2016 primary debate, in which Rubio mocked Trump for having small hands. “And you know what they say about guys with small hands,” Rubio said, prompting Trump to insist “there’s no problem” there. Elster, who wants to keep the joke going, had his initial trademark claim rejected after it was determined he would need Trump’s written consent. In 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled against the trademark office, but Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar then requested the Supreme Court hear the case.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.