Texas Appeals Court Rules That Dad Can Deny His Teen Contraceptives
The new ruling reaffirms parts of the old one, but may also save the Title X program in Texas.
Photo illustration by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
A U.S. Appeals Court ruled on Tuesday that under Texas law, a father can deny birth control from his teen daughter, but may have also saved Title X services in the process.
The plaintiff, father-of-three Alexander Deanda, claimed that Title X, a program which provides funding for medical care to patients under 18, was violating a Texas law which gives parents the right to consent to their teenagers obtaining contraceptives. According to the complaint, neither Deanda nor his daughters have sought the services at Title X clinic.
The case was brought by Jonathan Mitchell the state’s former solicitor general, who was behind the state’s six week abortion ban.
Federal regulations forbid clinics in the Title X program from notifying the parents or requiring their consent. Similar challenges to Title X have been denied on the grounds that requiring this approval violates a minor’s right to privacy.
The original ruling in this case came from District Court Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk, a Trump-appointee who notoriously went rogue by halting the FDA approval of mifepristone, and has shared strong anti-abortion and conservative views. In December, he held that “the Title X program violates the constitutional right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children.”
Get the best of The Beast delivered right to your inbox
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
As a result, in January Texas’s Title X Administrator ordered that teens needed to get their parents’ permission before receiving contraceptives at a federally-funded clinic. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services sought review for this case.
The new ruling affirms Deanda’s standing, but walks back Judge Kacsmaryk’s claim about Title X, instead arguing that the two laws “reinforce each other.”
“A grantee can comply with both,” the ruling said. “Moreover, Title X’s goal (encouraging family participation in teens’ receiving family planning services) and is not undermined by Texas’s goal (empowering parents to consent to their teen’s receiving contraceptives).”
This ruling may help to preserve the existence of Title X in the state of Texas.
See more of our coverage in your search results.
Got a tip? Send it to The Daily Beast here.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.