Trump Is Four Times a Loser as Judge Blocks ‘Big Law’ Attack
Another judge has shielded big law firms from the MAGA figurehead’s punitive executive orders.

Anadolu/via Getty Images
A judge has slapped down President Donald Trump’s punitive executive orders targeting law firms for a fourth time.
District Court Judge Loren AliKhan, appointed by former President Joe Biden, ruled that Trump’s order targeting law firm Susman Godfrey “violates the US Constitution and must be permanently enjoined,” Business Insider reported.
“In the ensuing months, every court to have considered a challenge to one of these orders has found grave constitutional violations and permanently enjoined enforcement of the order in full,” AliKhan wrote in the Friday ruling, adding, “Today, this court follows suit.”
AliKhan is the fourth judge to rule against Trump after the MAGA president unleashed a flurry of executive orders in February and March directed at large law firms such Paul Weiss, Perkins Coie, and Covington & Burling, among others, alleging they weaponized the judicial system against him.

President Donald Trump signed the suicide prevention line into law in 2020, but his 2025 attack on “gender ideology” has changed things.
Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images
In a raft of executive orders, the president called for reviews of each firm’s government contracts, the cancellation of security clearances for some employees, and blocking some firm members from entering federal buildings, including courthouses—damaging their ability to conduct business.
ADVERTISEMENT
In a statement, Susman Godfrey called the court’s ruling “a resounding victory for the rule of law and the right of every American to be represented by legal counsel without fear of retaliation.”
Sign Up for The Swamp Newsletter
By clicking “SUBSCRIBE” you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
The Trump administration hit back in a statement.
“The decision to grant any individual access to this nation’s secrets is a sensitive judgment call entrusted to the president,” White House Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields said to Business Insider. “Weighing these factors and implementing such decisions are core executive powers, and reviewing the president’s clearance decisions falls well outside the judiciary’s authority.”

A mobile billboard slams law firms that made a deal with Trump, calling on Big Law to “stop bending the knee.”
Brian Stukes/Getty Images for Demand Justice
Whereas many firms chose to challenge Trump’s executive orders, others such as Cadwalader; Simpson Thacher; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; Kirkland & Ellis; Skadden; A&O Shearman; and Latham & Watkins have capitulated to Trump’s demands with billions of dollars of pro-bono work offered at Trump’s discretion, among other settlement terms, Bloomberg reported.
Former Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, also saw his firm, Willkie Farr & Gallagher, make a deal with Trump, even though he reportedly lobbied against it, The New York Times reported.

Doug Emhoff’s firm, Willkie Farr & Gallagher, reportedly made a deal with Trump against his wishes.
MANDEL NGAN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
However, those deals have not been without consequence. The Wall Street Journal reported that at least 11 major companies, including Oracle, Morgan Stanley, Microsoft, and McDonald’s, have shifted their legal work away from firms that have struck deals with the Trump administration.
Register below to read this article for free or subscribe
to unlock unlimited access to The Daily Beast.
Monthly
$1
First month then $5.99/month
Annual
$35
First year then $59.99/year
Premium
$79
First year then $119.99/year
*Substack access provided by the next business day, using your subscription email. Choosing the Premium plan constitutes your permission to share your subscription email with Substack and your agreement to Substack’s Privacy Policy.
Already have an account? Sign In
Looks like you already have a subscription!
You're all set!
Thanks for subscribing.
